Re: Batch import, Java

2016-09-20 Thread Pat Ferrel
They were just officially donated. Will take time to house and release though so use the old ones for now. On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Gustavo Frederico wrote: I would like to see the current SDKs as integral part of the new Apache distribution. Is that

Re: Model performance history with PredictionIO

2016-09-20 Thread Donald Szeto
Hi Vijay, This is definitely an interesting idea and would be very useful for production and debugging. In fact, if you look at the EngineInstances / EvaluationInstances classes, some foundation is already in place and it just desperately need a UI to expose it. Would it be something that you be

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Donald Szeto
Hi Andy, What if the set of artifacts are built from the source tarball, and they are an integral part of the ecosystem (e.g. PredictionIO engine developers use these artifacts to build engines)? I read from http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#stage-release-vote that we

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Andrew Purtell
The release artifact should be one signed and summed tarball. > On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > that was my thinking too, hence I have been holding off from even > downloading any of the artifacts. > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Pat Ferrel

Re: Batch import, Java

2016-09-20 Thread Gustavo Frederico
I would like to see the current SDKs as integral part of the new Apache distribution. Is that possible? Thanks Gustavo On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Which brings up the next set of issues: What do we do for Salesforce owned > SDKs? Can the SDKs be

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Suneel Marthi
that was my thinking too, hence I have been holding off from even downloading any of the artifacts. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Shouldn’t this be one tarball? > > > On Sep 18, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > Yes.

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Pat Ferrel
Shouldn’t this be one tarball? On Sep 18, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: Yes. Many of them are sources, docs, poms and signatures though. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > So all of these artifacts need to be verified

[GitHub] incubator-predictionio pull request #297: Update document

2016-09-20 Thread djKooks
GitHub user djKooks opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/297 Update document While installing from source with Postgresql, there were no default JDBC driver file, so I add guide for download and setup for this. Please give a comment if there