Re: [DISCUSS] Report an error when seeking a multi-topics consumer that subscribes no topics

Il giorno mer 29 mag 2024 alle ore 11:10 Baodi Shi ha scritto: > +1 > > > Thanks, > Baodi Shi > > > On May 29, 2024 at 14:50:12, Yunze Xu wrote: > > > Hi community, > > > > Recently I found the behavior of seeking a multi-topics consumer is > > intuitive. If there are no internal consumers, the

Regerssion in EntryFilter loading in Pulsar 3.x

Hello, I have found this regression related to EntryFilters https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22767 The problem has been introduced in 3.0.0. Can you please review the patch ? It must be committed to all of the active branches from 3.0 onwards Best regards Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] PIP-351: Additional options for Pulsar-Test client to support KeyStore based TLS

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Ven 17 Mag 2024, 03:54 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > > BTW, a PIP requires 3 binding votes. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Shasank Sekhar Pandey 于2024年5月17日 > 周五03:21写道： > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to start a voting thread for PIP-351: [improve][pip] >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-347: add role field in consumer's stat

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 14 mag 2024 alle ore 11:31 太上玄元道君 ha scritto: > +1 nonbinding > > Thanks, > Tao Jiuming > > thetumbled 于2024年5月14日 周二17:26写道： > > > Hi, Pulsar Community. > > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-347: add role field in > > consumer's stat. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Jetty 12 since Jetty 9.4.x has reached end-of-line in June 2022

+1 to the upgrade The only problem is for any broker plugin that registers a Servlet, so we cannot cherry-pick this change to preview release lines Enrico Il giorno mer 8 mag 2024 alle ore 22:05 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Targeting 3.4.x/4.0.x for Jetty 12 upgrade. > Here's the WIP: >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 8 mag 2024 alle ore 12:51 Zike Yang ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:22 PM Yubiao Feng > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks > > Yubiao Feng > > > > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 11:27 AM Hang Chen wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

gt; review > > for a lng time, I'm very appreciate it that if you can help review > > > > 4. There are t many flags in pulsar(~500), I think we should be > > cautious when introducing new FLAGs > > > > Thanks, > > Tao Jiuming > > > > Enr

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-349: Add systemCursorNames ignore list for TTL check

ames should be always handled automatically Enrico > > Penghui > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:51 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Overall I support this idea, but the name 'systemCursorsNames' is not > good > > and we should not make it configurable

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-349: Add systemCursorNames ignore list for TTL check

Overall I support this idea, but the name 'systemCursorsNames' is not good and we should not make it configurable. First, we have to make a call to the TTL thing, otherwise we will end up in using that for other stuff, and not only TTL. Second, we shouldn't make this configurable. Those cursors

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

esults, like overwhelmed systems Enrico > > Enrico Olivelli 于2024年5月5日 周日02:41写道： > > > Overall I think it is a good idea. > > > > What about adding a flag to enable this behavior? > > > > In case there are problems with the offloader the topic won't be able to

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

Overall I think it is a good idea. What about adding a flag to enable this behavior? In case there are problems with the offloader the topic won't be able to load. Enrico Il Sab 4 Mag 2024, 17:12 Hang Chen ha scritto: > Hi guys, > I pushed a new proposal to improve the tiered storage

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 3.3.0 release

+1 Thanks for driving the release. FYI On the BookKeeper side there are some fixes about metrics, maybe we could ask for a new 4.17.1 release Enrico Il giorno dom 28 apr 2024 alle ore 21:04 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks for driving the release. > > Penghui > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024

Re: [VOTE] PIP-327 Support force topic loading for unrecoverable errors

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mar 16 Apr 2024, 19:08 Rajan Dhabalia ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to start voting thread for PIP-327 which also addresses issue > # https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/21751 > > PIP design PR: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21752 >

Re: (Apache committer criteria) [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika

he Pulsar community > > > would be a good starting point. One clear indication of a problem is > the > > > number of open pull requests we have in apache/pulsar; currently, there > > > are 320 open pull requests. > > > > If you want to revie

Re: [VOTE] PIP-343: Use picocli instead of jcommander

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 6 mar 2024 alle ore 16:04 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > > Hello, > > A new proposal to improve the CLI user experience. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22181 > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ydg1q064cd11pxwz693frtk4by74q32f > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-324: Alpine Docker images

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 02:55 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:54 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > -Lari > > > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 23:48, Matteo Merli > wrote: > > > > > > Opening the vote thread

Re: (Apache committer criteria) [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika

contributions are blocked, please start a new thread with this problem. This is a community, it is not a product managed by one single company. Best regards Enrico Olivelli Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 06:27 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > I will not enter into debating the long list of grievances here, thoug

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire pulsar-all Docker image and spin-off Python Functions runtime

+1 Great idea Enrico Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 08:23 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > +1 > > This is a good idea, and then we must provide a document on building the > own connector image and python functions runtime image. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Matteo Merli 于2024年3月6日周三 07:04写道： > > > The docker image

Re: Staging release artifacts fail when file size exceeds 429MB, ASF Infra ticket created to increase limit by about 100MB

Il Mar 5 Mar 2024, 14:33 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > The size had increased from 428MiB to 434MiB. I had mixed the units > MiB/1048576B and MB/100B. We found an explanation to the increase. > byte-buddy-1.14.12.jar adds 4MiB to the release and the remaining 2MiB > comes from upgraded jars. >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Kiryl Valkovich

Congratulations! Enrico Il Mar 5 Mar 2024, 17:03 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > Congrats! You are definitely a great addition to Pulsar committers! > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 4:58 AM Zixuan Liu wrote: > > > Congrats! > > > > Lari Hotari 于2024年2月27日周二 14:14写道： > > > > > Congrats, Kiryl! > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-342: Support OpenTelemetry metrics in Pulsar client

I support the initiative Lgtm Thanks Enrico Enrico Il Dom 3 Mar 2024, 04:09 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > PIP PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22178 > > WIP of proposed implementation: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22179 > > > > # PIP 342: Support

A jclouds VOTE us running, heads up!

against that RC. I personally don't have time, but I hope that someone could help there Thanks Enrico Olivelli

Re: [DISCUSS] Do not create partitioned metadata when calling pulsarClient.getPartitionsForTopic(topicName)

Il Gio 29 Feb 2024, 08:46 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 for the motivation > > We should not create partitioned topics when calling > `pulsarClient.getPartitionsForTopic` > > The tricky part is the broker doesn't know if the partition metadata > getting request is from create produce/consumer or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar Helm Chart 3.3.0 based on 3.3.0-candidate-1

+1 (binding) Verified checksums and signatures Installed on minikube and run a few smoke tests from the "toolset" pod Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno mar 27 feb 2024 alle ore 00:45 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > - Deploy pulsar cluster on local docker-desktop(with

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate CLI parser from jcommander to picocli

a preliminary idea to replace jcommander, and I will > > write a PIP later. > > > > Thanks, > > Zixuan > > > > > > Enrico Olivelli 于2024年2月23日周五 22:59写道： > > > > > Il Ven 23 Feb 2024, 04:34 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > > > > > > > Tha

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate CLI parser from jcommander to picocli

Il Ven 23 Feb 2024, 04:34 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > Thanks for the feedback! > > > Please take into account Pulsar Shell extensions > > This is a tricky issue, I noticed that it depends on jcommander here, Can you please share some pointers ? IIRC the shell extensions shouldn't need

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate CLI parser from jcommander to picocli

+1 Please take into account Pulsar Shell extensions Enrico Il Mer 21 Feb 2024, 11:21 Girish Sharma ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > It has been a pain trying to figure out what's the exact sub-param name > given that some of them are 20+ characters long. > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 3:47 PM

Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal to Replace Pulsar's Homegrown Configuration Framework with Gestalt Config

Lari, Il Mer 21 Feb 2024, 10:27 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to bring up an issue with Pulsar's containers, specifically > regarding the method of overriding configurations. For instance, the > Apache Pulsar Helm chart employs "bin/apply-config-from-env.py >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika

Congratulations! Enrico Il Mar 20 Feb 2024, 18:08 Kiryl Valkovich ha scritto: > Congratulations, Asaf! > > From: Lari Hotari > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5:50 PM > To: dev@pulsar.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika > > The Apache

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.3 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) Validated checksum and signature All tests passed on Ubuntu, JDK1 Thanks for running the release Enrico Il giorno ven 16 feb 2024 alle ore 19:01 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > Validated source artifacts > - checked sha512 checksum > - checked signature > > Validated

Re: HI - Introducing myself to the community, exploring/adopting Pulsar!

Welcome Enrico Il giorno mer 7 feb 2024 alle ore 11:30 Julien Jakubowski ha scritto: > > Hi Austin, > > Welcome to the Pulsar community! > I’m excited to see how you’ll integrate Pulsar into your work at ChartBoost. > Contributions, whether through documentation, sharing success stories, or >

Re: [DISCUSS] Deletion of Current Ledger upon Rollover

Xiangying Il giorno mar 6 feb 2024 alle ore 13:01 Xiangying Meng ha scritto: > > Dear Community, > > I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to discuss a modification > to the behavior of deleting the current ledger. As you may know, in Pulsar, > the current ledger cannot be deleted

Re: [VOTE] PIP-335: Oxia metadata support

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 6 feb 2024 alle ore 11:36 houxiaoyu ha scritto: > > +1 nonbinding > > Thanks, > Xiaoyu Hou > > 太上玄元道君 于2024年2月6日周二 15:59写道： > > > > +1 nonbinding > > > > Matteo Merli 于2024年2月6日 周二04:40写道： > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22009 > > > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 3.2.0 released

Congrats ! this is a great milestone Thank you for driving the release Enrico Il giorno lun 5 feb 2024 alle ore 13:52 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 3.2.0. > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-335: Oxia metadata support

Sounds good Enrico Il giorno gio 1 feb 2024 alle ore 07:18 Apurva Telang ha scritto: > > +1 > > Best Regards, > Apurva Telang > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 8:00 PM 太上玄元道君 wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Matteo Merli 于2024年2月1日 周四07:58写道： > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22009 > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.2 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) - verified checksums - run all tests, on JDK 11 Thanks for putting up the release Enrico Il giorno lun 15 gen 2024 alle ore 13:08 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > - verified source package checksum and signature. > - verified binary `./scripts/validate_staging_repo.sh

Re: [VOTE] PIP-325: Add command to abort transaction

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 8 Gen 2024, 03:55 ruihongzhou ha scritto: > Hi community, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-325: Add command to abort > transaction. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21731 > > Releted PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21630 > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-326: Create a BOM to ease dependency management

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno ven 22 dic 2023 alle ore 02:46 Apurva Telang ha scritto: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:30 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:24 PM Nicolò Boschi > > wrote: > > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 3.1.2 Candidate 2

+1 (binding) Built from sources Run some smoke tests with Pulsar standalone Verified checksums and signatures (I had to import KEYS, there was a new key) Enrico Il giorno mer 13 dic 2023 alle ore 09:42 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > - Checked the signatures > - Built from source >

Re: [DISCUSS] Strategy for pushing the latest tag to Pulsar docker images

The first option is better, as it allows people to try out the latest features and hopefully it is more stable. On the other side we should not encourage people to use 'latest' in production as because it is by design unpredictable. Let's day that you have a system that had been running for a

Re: [VOTE] PIP-313 Support force unsubscribe using consumer api

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 11 dic 2023 alle ore 12:56 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:18 PM Apurva Telang > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 6:12 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 11 Dic 2023, 08:38 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 3:34 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm starting the vote for PIP-320 (1st sub-PIP of PIP-264) > > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21635

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar Python clieng 3.4.0

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 4 dic 2023 alle ore 08:31 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python client 3.4.0. > > It's over three months since the release of 3.3.0, and there are 46 new > commits: >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

Il giorno mer 29 nov 2023 alle ore 12:01 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:18 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Asaf, > > > > > > > > Il Mar 28 Nov 2023, 19:14 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > > > > Hi, > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Apache Pulsar Office Hour Meetings

d all of the commuters can > > volunteer to run this meeting. > > >> > > >> When? > > >> > > >> We need to talk about a suitable time range. It’s better to cover > > different time zones. EMEA, APAC, etc. > > >> > > >&

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

Asaf, Il Mar 28 Nov 2023, 19:14 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > Hi, > > This is the first sub-PIP for parent PIP-264 > ("Enhanced OTel-based metric > system"). > > This PIPs goal is to introduce OpenTelemetry into Apache Pulsar. When this > PIP is

Re: Pulsar Community Meeting minutes 2023/11/23

Thanks Lari for sharing Enrico Il Ven 24 Nov 2023, 11:03 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Pulsar Community Meeting minutes 2023/11/23 > > Notice: Draft minutes pending review - please suggest any corrections or > additions by replying to this email thread. > > - Attendees: >- Girish Sharma >

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Apache Pulsar Office Hour Meetings

Hello, this sounds like a good idea. It is not clear to me who is going to run these meetings (also when and how) Can you please share some more context ? Maybe I missed something (both here or on private@) Thanks Enrico Il giorno lun 20 nov 2023 alle ore 16:36 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > Hi

Re: [VOTE] PIP-317: Add `bookkeeperDeleted` field to show whether a ledger is deleted from the Bookie while using tiered storage

+1 It will be important to add tests about rolling back to the previous version of Pulsar and/or clusters with mixed versions of the brokers (during rolling upgrades). The old version should not complain about the new field added. Maybe you can add a note in the PIP Enrico Il Mer 15 Nov 2023,

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.0 Candidate 2

+1 (binding) - run all the tests (on JDK17, M1 laptop) - verified checksums and signatures thanks for putting up the release Enrico Il giorno mer 15 nov 2023 alle ore 10:17 Christophe Bornet ha scritto: > > This is release candidate 2 for the Reactive Java client for Apache > Pulsar, version

Re: [DISSCUSS] Don't retain null-key messages during topic compaction

This is a good point. Is it worth to make it configurable per topic and per namespace? Even if this behavior is kind if a side effect or bug, maybe some applications rely on it. Flags that change the behavior per cluster are hard to adopt in nig cluster with many tenants. We should always take

Re: Reporting and tooling to detect thread leaks in Pulsar tests

Il Lun 30 Ott 2023, 06:39 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Hi Asaf, > > Yes, the visibility aspect is already solved by using warnings in the > summary view. Please check the example > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/runs/6680066364?pr=21450 . > > Job summaries could also be used, but they

Re: [DISCUSS] Auto release Nuget artifacts for DotPulsar

How do we handle the VOTE? Enrico Il Lun 30 Ott 2023, 08:06 Zike Yang ha scritto: > Hi, David > > Thanks for initializing this discussion. > I'm +1 for making the auto-release process for the DotPulsar. I have > left some comments in the PR. > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Java 21 for development and Pulsar server component runtime

I support the idea of moving to JDK21, as far as we continue to support JDK8 for the clients Thanks for bringing up this topic Enrico Il giorno mer 18 ott 2023 alle ore 13:37 mattison chao ha scritto: > > Thanks for your answer. > > > > We have the PIP, but that doesn't answer the question

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.4.0 Candidate 1

My command was wrong, you have to use "--verify" and not "-verify" (with one dash). +1 (binding) - Built from sources - Run the tests - Verified checksums and signatures Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno mer 4 ott 2023 alle ore 11:42 Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.4.0 Candidate 1

I am not able to validate the signature: gpg -verify pulsar-client-reactive-0.4.0-src.tar.gz.asc gpg: enabled compatibility flags: gpg: ify: skipped: No public key gpg: pulsar-client-reactive-0.4.0-src.tar.gz.asc: encryption failed: No public key Enrico Il giorno mar 3 ott 2023 alle ore 13:55

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 3.1.1

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 25 set 2023 alle ore 05:08 Yubiao Feng ha scritto: > > +1 > > Thanks > Yubiao Feng > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar 3.1.1. > > > > It's over one month since the release of 3.1.0 and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 3.0.2

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 25 set 2023 alle ore 05:05 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > +1 > > BR, > Zike Yang > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:58 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Please use the correct name of the project - Apache Pulsar. > > > > Thanks, > > Dave > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Sep

Re: [VOTE] PIP-297: Support terminating Function & Connector with the fatal exception

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 4 set 2023 alle ore 12:32 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > Hi, all > > Since there are no other concerns in the discussion, I'm delighted to > start the voting process for the PIP-297. > > Here is the link to the PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21079 > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-297: Support raising exceptions using Function & Connector context

Zike, Il giorno lun 28 ago 2023 alle ore 11:53 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > Hi, all > > I opened a new PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21079 > > This PIP is to improve the current function exception handler. It will > be applied to both Pulsar Function and Pulsar IO Connector. > > Please

Re: [Discuss] Release Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0

+1 Enrico Il Mar 15 Ago 2023, 14:04 Zike Yang ha scritto: > +1 > > BR, > Zike Yang > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:19 PM Baodi Shi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0. > > > > It has been over 2 months since the last release (3.2.0).

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent code style (esp. ws/indent) and autotools

Tison, Il Mar 15 Ago 2023, 16:56 tison ha scritto: > A demostration for change set - > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20974 While I think it is great to start with Spotless for little projects or when you start from scratch, appling a patch that changes 3.000+ files will make it very

Re: [VOTE] PIP 289: Secure Pulsar Connector Configuration

+1 (binding) Thanks Enrico Il Gio 10 Ago 2023, 18:46 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > - Michael > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:43 AM Michael Marshall > wrote: > > > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > This is the vote thread for PIP 289: > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 3.1.0 released

Congratulations! Enrico Il Lun 14 Ago 2023, 11:16 guo jiwei ha scritto: > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 3.1.0. > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics,

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept pulsar-admin-go as part of the Apache Pulsar project

+1 (binding) (Late on the train) Enrico Il Gio 10 Ago 2023, 05:39 tison ha scritto: > Hi, > > The vote for "Accept pulsar-admin-go as part of the Apache Pulsar project" > has PASSED and closed now. > > The result is as follows: > > 4 +1 binding Votes > - Yunze Xu > - tison > - mattisonchao >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-268: Add support of topic stats/stats-internal using

I support this proposal. I can't understand if this is still a VOTE thread. If it is a VOTE thread then this is my +1 (binding) Sorry for late reply Enrico Il Gio 3 Ago 2023, 21:43 Rajan Dhabalia ha scritto: > Hi Penghui. > > I think I tried to answer most of the questions and have enough

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for donating pulsar-admin-go to the Apache Pulsar project

+1 Thanks Enrico Il giorno lun 31 lug 2023 alle ore 17:59 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > > This is a good idea for the Pulsar community. > > > The first one is hosting code in three repos: pulsar-admin-go, > pulsar-client-go, pulsar-auth-go. Then factor out the shared auth logics > into

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 3.1.0 release

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 31 lug 2023 alle ore 04:35 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > The next two weeks will be code freeze time, and I will release rc on > August 11 if everything goes well > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:17 AM guo jiwei wrote: > > > I have cut the 3.1

Re: [DISCUSS] Make the API compatibility guarantee clear

Yunze, I agree overall with the proposal, I added some comments inline below Enrico Il giorno ven 14 lug 2023 alle ore 13:25 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > > Good suggestion. We can try that. > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 7:03 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > > Makes sense. We should use

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 3.0.1

Il giorno ven 14 lug 2023 alle ore 13:22 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > > -1 (binding) > > Many public interfaces are modified. I second Yunze -1 (binding) from myself as well Enrico > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20666 >

Re: [DISCUSS] Cherry-pick PR-16059 to 2.10 to prevent infinite unloading

+1 Enrico Il Dom 2 Lug 2023, 06:19 Hang Chen ha scritto: > +1 for cherry-picking it to branch-2.10. We have a flag to control > whether to enable or disable it. > > `removeMostServicingBrokersForNamespace ` is introduced by [1] to > solve the problem that when all bundles in a particular

Re: [VOTE] PIP-279: Reformat property in generateResponseWithEntry

+1 binding Thank you Enrico Il giorno mer 28 giu 2023 alle ore 08:57 Haiting Jiang ha scritto: > > +1 binding > > Thanks, > Haiting > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:17 AM houxiaoyu wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Xiaoyu Hou > > > > steven lu 于2023年6月28日周三 09:40写道： > > > > > Hi,

Re: Pulsar doesn't support cgroup v2 which became the default in Kubernetes v1.25+ (AKS v1.25, GKE v1.26, EKS v1.26)

Il giorno mar 27 giu 2023 alle ore 12:58 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > > I take my words back about branch-2.9 . It's also using Java 11 at runtime, > so it should be possible to apply https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20659 > to branch-2.9 too so that we get cgroup v2 support for Pulsar 2.9.x.

Re: Can we archive https://github.com/apache/pulsar-release?

Yes we can. It was a tentative goal of creating a new workflow to build releases, especially for the pulsar-all docker image, that depends both on pulsar main repo code and on Pulsar SQL, that we wanted to remove from the base repository. Enrico Il giorno mar 27 giu 2023 alle ore 08:27 Asaf

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.10.5 release

Xiangying, Il giorno lun 26 giu 2023 alle ore 11:47 Xiangying Meng ha scritto: > > Hello, community: >It has been more than 2 months since the release of 2.10.4. During this > period, we have 64 fixes. > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.10.4...branch-2.10 >I suggest releasing

Re: [DISCUSS] About cherry-picking `Use Ubuntu 22.04 for Pulsar images (#20475)`

My understanding is that Ubuntu 20 is EOL. I agree that we should cherry-pick that change (without upgrading the Python client) to 2.10, 2.11 and also to 3.0 Enrico Il giorno lun 26 giu 2023 alle ore 11:10 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > Hello community: >For this patch Use Ubuntu 22.04 for

Re: Improving the usability of the bookie Isolation feature

Il giorno lun 26 giu 2023 alle ore 09:21 Yubiao Feng ha scritto: > > Hi Yan,Asaf > > > I want to add only one step to your plan. > > If you introduce this flag in Y.X, then in Y.(X+1), > > let's remove this flag > > and keep the "true" value as the behavior. > > I agree with Asaf +1 Enrico > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-279: Reformat property in generateResponseWithEntry

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 26 giu 2023 alle ore 07:53 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > This is a bug and we need this fix. > > > > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:23 AM steven lu wrote: > > > # Motivation > > > > reformat property,for a http

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.2 release

Jiwei, Il giorno lun 26 giu 2023 alle ore 08:09 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > Hello, community: >It has been more than 2 months since the release of 2.11.1. During this > period, we have more than 80 fixes. > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.11.1...branch-2.11 >I suggest releasing

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable Pulsar Functions runtime to support new runtimes

Lari, Il giorno mar 20 giu 2023 alle ore 09:33 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > > Dear Pulsar Community Members, > > I would like to initiate a discussion on making the Pulsar Functions > runtime "pluggable". In doing so, we can ensure that the addition of new > runtime types becomes more

Re: [VOTE] PIP-275: Introduce topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 19 giu 2023 alle ore 14:48 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > +1 (non binding) > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM 丛搏 wrote: > > > +1(binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Bo > > > > houxiaoyu 于2023年6月19日周一 14:04写道： > > > > > > Hi, community: > > > > > > This thread is to

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-264: Enhanced OTel-based metric system

t; --- > > > > OTel supports two kinds of exporter: Prometheus (HTTP) and OTLP (push). > > We'll just configure to use them. > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:35 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > > Asaf, > > > thanks for c

Re: [June 30th] Apache Pulsar Meetup Japan #5 is coming!

Great news! Thanks for sharing Enrico Il Ven 2 Giu 2023, 05:09 tison ha scritto: > Thanks for sharing this information! Looking forward to the event :D > > Best, > tison. > > > Nozomi Kurihara 于2023年6月2日周五 11:04写道： > >> Dear Pulsar Enthusiasts, >> >> We are thrilled to announce the upcoming

Re: Pulsar roadmap

Asaf, Il Dom 4 Giu 2023, 15:37 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > Hi, > > > Do we have a place we manage future Pulsar roadmap? Big ticket items, > smaller ticket ones? > I mean, I know we have GitHub issues, but that’s a forest. > I was wondering if we have created a way to display those as a roadmap,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 3.0.1

Il Lun 12 Giu 2023, 02:23 PengHui Li ha scritto: > Do we need to have https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3979 > in the 3.0.1 release? since it's a critical issue for BookKeeper. > Yes we do Enrico > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 12:07 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] which versions are EOL?

Micheal, Il giorno ven 9 giu 2023 alle ore 07:54 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I recently noticed this page on our website: > https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/#supported-versions > > It shows that only 2.11 and 3.0 are active and security support. >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-275: Introduce numWorkerThreadsForPersistentTopic to deprecate numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration

I would call it numWorkersTopicOrderedExecutor and remove "persistent/non-persistent" from the name. Or alternatively we could introduce a topicOrderedExecutor for persistent topics. Unfortunately the topicOrderedExecutor is now used for many things (I also used it the wrong way when I

Re: [VOTE] PIP-273: Enable hostname verification by default

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mar 6 Giu 2023, 10:32 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:09 PM Michael Marshall > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > - Michael > > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:08 AM Michael Marshall > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > >

Re: [DISUCSS] Fix and republish the pulsar-all image for Pulsar 3.0.0

gt; > > -DskipTests \ > > > -Pdocker -Pdocker-push \ > > > -Ddocker.platforms=linux/amd64,linux/arm64 \ > > > -Ddocker.organization=snzkyang \ > > > -pl docker/pulsar,docker/pulsar-all > > > ``` > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-263: Just auto-create no-partitioned DLQ And Prevent auto-create a DLQ for a DLQ

-1 I had missed the discussion thread. Please follow up there Enrico Il giorno ven 5 mag 2023 alle ore 17:04 Yubiao Feng ha scritto: > > Hi Pulsar Community > > This thread is to start the vote for PIP 259. > > Discussion: *https://lists.apache.org/thread/tp25lom2ggztljlo76krsldo270f293j >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-263: Just auto-create no-partitioned DLQ And Prevent auto-create a DLQ for a DLQ

-1 I had missed the discussion thread. Please follow up there Enrico Il giorno mer 31 mag 2023 alle ore 09:07 Yubiao Feng ha scritto: > > Hi Pulsar Community > > This thread is to start the vote for PIP 263. > I'm starting the voting process for PIP-263. > > DISCUSS:

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-263: Just auto-create no-partitioned DLQ And Prevent auto-create a DLQ for a DLQ

Yubiao, I understand your problem: DLQ and retry topic don't play well with automatic topic creation. We are introducing wire protocol changes and also starting to add topic properties for every new topic (they come with a cost on metadata). I am not sure that adding the

Re: [DISUCSS] Fix and republish the pulsar-all image for Pulsar 3.0.0

I am really worried about the process. When we ran the VOTE and we provided the docker images, were they already broken ? In any case we cannot overwrite those images, they have been cached all over the world now. It is safer to cut a new 3.0.1 release and run a VOTE. Maybe we can remove the

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-272 Add a `StateStoreConfig` to the `WorkerConfig`

Looks good +1 Enrico Il Lun 29 Mag 2023, 04:47 Pengcheng Jiang ha scritto: > Dear Pulsar community, > > I created a pip to make pulsar functions' `StateStoreProvider` configurable > with custom configurations: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20419 > > Any feedback and suggestions are

Re: Question about Apache Foundation content policies on Pusar website

Kiryl, Il Gio 25 Mag 2023, 13:00 Kiryl Valkovich ha scritto: > Hi, > I’d like to add information about available trainings, courses, and > service providers to the Pulsar website. https://pulsar.apache.org/ > > Like what Kubernetes do at Linux Foundation: > https://kubernetes.io/training/ >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-271: Add broker health check status into prometheus metrics #20147

Vineeth, Il Mer 24 Mag 2023, 21:57 vineeth p ha scritto: > Hello, > > Broker metrics don't have anything to indicate the health of the broker (to > indicate if the broker is active). In Prometheus broker metrics which are > used for monitoring, it will be useful if metrics also show the broker

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

wards and what’s more convenient and consider >refining that. > > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Dave, > > I don't think that we are dropping the discussion on the mailing list. > > In that case I would cast a -1. > > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

Dave, I don't think that we are dropping the discussion on the mailing list. In that case I would cast a -1. Enrico Il giorno mar 16 mag 2023 alle ore 06:27 Dave Fisher ha scritto: > > -0 (binding) having discussions on the mailing list makes it much easier to > understand decisions years in

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

+1 (binding) The proposal makes sense to me. Let's try Thanks for carrying on with this initative Enrico Il giorno lun 15 mag 2023 alle ore 05:23 Max Xu ha scritto: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for driving this helpful proposal! > > Best, > Max Xu > > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 6:52 PM Asaf

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-264: Enhanced OTel-based metric system

Asaf, thanks for contributing in this area. Metrics are a fundamental feature of Pulsar. Currently I find it very awkward to maintain metrics, and also I see it as a problem to support only Prometheus. Regarding your proposal, IIRC in the past someone else proposed to support other metrics

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >