Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Thanks both David and Taylor for the support. I think too that it would be good to have few mentors continuing being involved in the project. Once the "contributing" PR is merged and the website is updated (we're waiting on Jenkins to come back up at this point), then I will start the VOTE thread

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

For the record, I’m supportive of graduation for Pulsar at this point. I think the branding debacle and the maturity model self-assessment has forced some good introspection on the part of the PPMC in terms of what’s expected of them as a TLP, and I think they are ready. I would like to see a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

+1 from me as well. Regards, Dave > On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > +1from me. Nice work. > > -Taylor > >> On Aug 30, 2018, at 5:32 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: >> >> Dave, >> >> I have reworded a bit the "becoming committer" section by adding this >> paragraph: >> >>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

+1from me. Nice work. -Taylor > On Aug 30, 2018, at 5:32 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > Dave, > > I have reworded a bit the "becoming committer" section by adding this > paragraph: > > > Every new committer has to be proposed by a current committer and then > privately discussed and

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Dave, I have reworded a bit the "becoming committer" section by adding this paragraph: Every new committer has to be proposed by a current committer and then privately discussed and voted in by the members of the Pulsar PMC. For details about this process and for candidate requirements

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Hi - Here is a good description of MERIT - http://www.apache.org/foundation/governance/pmcs.html#merit Regards, Dave > On Aug 29, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > The explanation should be more carefully

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Hi - The explanation should be more carefully worded. Contributors do not self nominate themselves. The PMC will notice contributors who have proven themselves. A discussion follows on private@ to avoid any embarrassment. Assuming that the VOTE passes if it is for PMC then a NOTICE is given to

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 5:50 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > This is very detailed and looks good with one important omission. > > How does one go on from being a contributor to committer / PMC status? > There should be a description about that. > > Please discuss! > That is a very good point. I have

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Short answers inline after a very quick review. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 28, 2018, at 5:35 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 5:04 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> The contributing guide is a 404 on the website and I don’t see it on the >> menus. (Is it

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 5:04 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > The contributing guide is a 404 on the website and I don’t see it on the > menus. (Is it translated? I thought I saw an initial commit for it > yesterday. The PR is still not merged. Waiting for some flaky tests on CI to let it go

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Hi - The contributing guide is a 404 on the website and I don’t see it on the menus. (Is it translated? I thought I saw an initial commit for it yesterday.) The descriptions on the team page are a little off - Members are both Committers and PPMC members. Please make that distinct. (In the ASF

RE: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Great work! +1 Nozomi 差出人: Matteo Merli 送信日時: 2018年8月28日 15:43:24 宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org 件名: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment I have started a draft of the maturity model assessment. You can find it on the wiki: https://github.com

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

Great work, Matteo! +1; #shipit - Sijie On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:43 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > I have started a draft of the maturity model assessment. > > You can find it on the wiki: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/wiki/Apache-Maturity-Model-Assessment-for-Pulsar > > Please

[DISCUSSION] Pulsar maturity model assessment

I have started a draft of the maturity model assessment. You can find it on the wiki: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/wiki/Apache-Maturity-Model-Assessment-for-Pulsar Please review it and provide feedback. Once there is agreement on this document, I think we should then do a vote to