All,
We are currently in a somewhat interesting situation wrt to .NET clients in
Qpid. I thought it might be helpful to get together the group of interested
parties to agree the best way forward for the existing clients, and also to
do some retrospective/forward looking requirements capture to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12661949#action_12661949
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-976:
-
Ted, thats an excellent patch! I hadn't realised the
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote:
We have (to the best of my knowledge) no requriements spec for either
implementation, functional or non-functional.
I think the basic requirement for a client is to allow a user to
I have a requirement for a feature to replicate queue state between
(clustered) brokers on a primary and DR site that I'm hoping to
implement over the next couple of weeks.
Attached is some notes through which I've been trying to formulate my
thoughts. If anyone else has any other thoughts,
All,
Just going through various JIRAs relating to MINA work on the Java side.
Can I take a quick temperature for whether we should be considering (without
opening a complex I/O thread!) upgrading MINA or whether we reckon that any
I/O work would take us away from it ?
Thanks,
Marnie
I'm interested.
Jonathan
Marnie McCormack wrote:
All,
We are currently in a somewhat interesting situation wrt to .NET clients in
Qpid. I thought it might be helpful to get together the group of interested
parties to agree the best way forward for the existing clients, and also to
do some
Just going through various JIRAs relating to MINA work on the Java side.
Can I take a quick temperature for whether we should be considering (without
opening a complex I/O thread!) upgrading MINA or whether we reckon that any
I/O work would take us away from it ?
Last time I looked it
While applying the thread abstraction patch to the MINA code, I noticed that
we also have MINA related classes copied from the Apache Directory project.
For example MultiThreadSocketConnector and ExistingSocketConnector
I believe any plan to reduce MINA coupling should takes these classes into
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
Also do we have a plan to phase out MINA in the future or do we first want
to try out their newer versions (after achieving some level of abstraction
in our IO layer) and see if there are improvements?
I think
2009/1/8 Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com:
While applying the thread abstraction patch to the MINA code, I noticed that
we also have MINA related classes copied from the Apache Directory project.
For example MultiThreadSocketConnector and ExistingSocketConnector
I believe any plan to reduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12662037#action_12662037
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-1479:
-
Looks reasonable.
Provide a thread abstraction
Here's another RC, this time (hopefully) with working windows build files:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-M4-RC7/
--Rafael
2009/1/8 Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com:
While applying the thread abstraction patch to the MINA code, I noticed that
we also have MINA related classes copied from the Apache Directory project.
For example MultiThreadSocketConnector and ExistingSocketConnector
I believe any plan to reduce
I would be very interested to join the conference call. Thanks.
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: Marnie McCormack [mailto:marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:53 AM
To: qpid-...@apache.org
Subject: Qpid .NET Strategy - Interested ?
All,
We are currently
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Martin Ritchie ritch...@apache.org wrote:
2009/1/8 Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com:
While applying the thread abstraction patch to the MINA code, I noticed
that
we also have MINA related classes copied from the Apache Directory
project.
For example
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
http://www.mono-project.com/SystemMessaging (there was also an attempt
to implement it on top of our 0-8 client but that
Robert Greig wrote:
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
http://www.mono-project.com/SystemMessaging (there was also an attempt
to implement it on top of our
+1 re WCF. WCF makes it much easier.
- Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
Hi,
I'm interested in using the python qpid client with jython. I've
gotten pretty far but I've had to make some slight modifications to
get it to run.
Basically,
1) a couple of from __future__ import generators were needed.
2) socket.SSLType is not defined so a try .. except AttributeError was
The header files for qpid/console (c++ console api) are not packaged in
make dist. I've committed a fix for this on the trunk and on the
M4-RCs branch.
-Ted
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in using the python qpid client with jython. I've
gotten pretty far but I've had to make some slight modifications to
get it to run.
Basically,
1) a couple of from __future__ import generators were needed.
2) socket.SSLType is not defined so a try ..
Ted Ross wrote:
The header files for qpid/console (c++ console api) are not packaged in
make dist. I've committed a fix for this on the trunk and on the
M4-RCs branch.
I'm about to head home now. I'll build an RC8 when I get home.
--Rafael
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
http://www.mono-project.com/SystemMessaging
Here's RC8. The only change from RC7 is the fix for the header files
that Ted mentioned:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-M4-RC8/
--Rafael
Hi All, does anybody know how to create a link to an anchor defined on the
same page?
I read the confluence notation guide but the suggested notation
[#anchorName] seems not working...it works only if you specify a page name
[pagename#ancorName] but in this way I'm creating a link to an anchor
25 matches
Mail list logo
