[jira] Created: (QPID-2613) message data is not commited to the persistent store on 0-8/0-9 codepath

message data is not commited to the persistent store on 0-8/0-9 codepath Key: QPID-2613 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2613 Project: Qpid Issue Type:

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2613) message data is not commited to the persistent store on 0-8/0-9 codepath

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-2613: - Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) message data is not commited to the persistent store

Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-2539) Update ACL file syntax to be clearer and add extra operations

On 17 May 2010 17:43, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote: part I am confused about in the thread is the following: Why introduce additional opperations to the ACL file format when they can already be covered with what is already in the format? I can see why we need to add (vhost,

[jira] Created: (QPID-2615) JMX Management Console fails to connect to 0.5 and below brokers if run in a Java5 VM

JMX Management Console fails to connect to 0.5 and below brokers if run in a Java5 VM - Key: QPID-2615 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2615 Project:

[jira] Created: (QPID-2614) QueueConfiguration requires to configurations to be provided on construction

QueueConfiguration requires to configurations to be provided on construction Key: QPID-2614 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2614 Project: Qpid

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2586) Give Client 0-10 close semantics not detach

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Ritchie updated QPID-2586: - Component/s: Java Client Give Client 0-10 close semantics not detach

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2586) Give Client 0-10 close semantics not detach

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868613#action_12868613 ] Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-2586: -- The correct thing to do would be to make the

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-2612) Recent DLL qpidtypes breaks the build on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim reassigned QPID-2612: Assignee: Gordon Sim Recent DLL qpidtypes breaks the build on Windows

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2589) Add a .NET binding to QPID Messaging API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868631#action_12868631 ] Gordon Sim commented on QPID-2589: -- A better pattern for high performance WCF would be to

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2586) Give Client 0-10 close semantics not detach

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868636#action_12868636 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2586: Rafi did have a fix for this, but didn't

Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-2539) Update ACL file syntax to be clearer and add extra operations

On 05/18/2010 07:13 AM, Andrew Kennedy wrote: On 17 May 2010 17:43, Carl Trieloffcctriel...@redhat.com wrote: part I am confused about in the thread is the following: Why introduce additional opperations to the ACL file format when they can already be covered with what is already in the

Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-2539) Update ACL file syntax to be clearer and add extra operations

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Andrew Kennedy andrewinternatio...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 May 2010 17:43, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote: part I am confused about in the thread is the following: Why introduce additional opperations to the ACL file format when they can already be

Re: [.net]: some debate please

I'll confess that I'm fairly uncomfortable with any other new .Net API, especially since the current situation is that we have no client which can interop across both brokers with all the other clients successfully (with the Java Broker 0-10 code not yet complete/prod ready). I'd rather been

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2559) When a subscription is created, message credits should only be set if the dispatcher is not null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Ritchie updated QPID-2559: - Attachment: QPID-2559.test Hi Rajith, The AMQConnectionTest is still failing. Not sure if you

Re: [.net]: some debate please

On 05/18/2010 10:37 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: I'll confess that I'm fairly uncomfortable with any other new .Net API, especially since the current situation is that we have no client which can interop across both brokers with all the other clients successfully (with the Java Broker 0-10 code

Re: [.net]: some debate please

On 05/18/2010 10:37 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: Another key point is that if we're going to produce 'bindings' we need to get much better at backwards compatibility on Qpid. We have existing C++ clients stranded on an old Qpid build as a result of some of our previous decisions, along with C#

Re: Re-factoring shell/batch scripts in bin directory

Hi Rajika, Thanks for your email. There are docs for these scripts on the wiki: http://qpid.apache.org/qpid-java-run-scripts.html Please do *not* change any of the broker script names as we have production apps for whom this would be a major pita ! A readme would be a great idea, hopefully

Re: [.net]: some debate please

What client are you talking about here Carl ? Marnie On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.comwrote: On 05/18/2010 10:37 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: Another key point is that if we're going to produce 'bindings' we need to get much better at backwards

Re: [.net]: some debate please

There are a host of inflight JIRAs for the Broker 0-10 work - but its not a short list. Its top priority for me. Marnie On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.comwrote: On 05/18/2010 10:37 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: I'll confess that I'm fairly uncomfortable with

Re: Re-factoring shell/batch scripts in bin directory

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Marnie McCormack marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Rajika, hi, Thanks for your email. There are docs for these scripts on the wiki: http://qpid.apache.org/qpid-java-run-scripts.html Please do *not* change any of the broker script names as we

Re: Re-factoring shell/batch scripts in bin directory

Hi Rajika, I definitely don't have a strong view on version numbering but Qpid has been in prod across a host of applications for years now. Qpid has real users transitting business critical data all round the world. Marnie On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com

Re: [.net]: some debate please

I want one WCF client that works with both brokers and interops with clients in all languages. I want only one. I want to avoid the confusion of having more than one, and I want to avoid putting effort into more than one I want the WCF client to use the new addressing scheme. Am I wanting

Re: Re-factoring shell/batch scripts in bin directory

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Marnie McCormack marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Rajika, hi, I definitely don't have a strong view on version numbering but Qpid has been in prod across a host of applications for years now. Qpid has real users transitting business critical

RE: [.net]: some debate please

Hi Jonathan, I want one WCF client that works with both brokers and interops with clients in all languages. I want only one. I want to avoid the confusion of having more than one, and I want to avoid putting effort into more than one I want the WCF client to use the new addressing

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2559) When a subscription is created, message credits should only be set if the dispatcher is not null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868696#action_12868696 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2559: Hi Martin, I am a little confused about

Re: [.net]: some debate please

On 05/18/2010 11:39 AM, Steve Huston wrote: Hi Jonathan, I want one WCF client that works with both brokers and interops with clients in all languages. I want only one. I want to avoid the confusion of having more than one, and I want to avoid putting effort into more than one

Re: [.net]: some debate please

On 05/18/2010 10:49 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: What client are you talking about here Carl ? C++ and Python have been done. Some list discussion has happened on Java. Ruby needs to be updated to Python style which missed 0.6, I believe that is not a big job. I understand that the

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2559) When a subscription is created, message credits should only be set if the dispatcher is not null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868707#action_12868707 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2559: Minor correction. The current

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2612) Recent DLL qpidtypes breaks the build on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chuck Rolke updated QPID-2612: -- Attachment: Messaging_dll.patch Patch to sort out the DLL import/export settings for the new

Re: [.net]: some debate please

Why would a user chose to use this binding instead of the WCF client - I guess thats the key question ? If I understand the previous posts in this thread, the answer is that people who are comfortable with WCF paradigms will use WCF, and people who like to think a little closer to AMQP on the

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2612) Recent DLL qpidtypes breaks the build on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chuck Rolke updated QPID-2612: -- Attachment: messaging_dll2.patch Resend. Corrects DLL import/export settings for new qpidmessaging DLL.

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2559) When a subscription is created, message credits should only be set if the dispatcher is not null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868770#action_12868770 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2559: Martin, I checked in a fix for

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2559) When a subscription is created, message credits should only be set if the dispatcher is not null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868781#action_12868781 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2559: -- Hi Martin, I am a little confused about your

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2612) Recent DLL qpidtypes breaks the build on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868789#action_12868789 ] Chuck Rolke commented on QPID-2612: --- Update 945778 fixes the build. This issue can be

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2559) When a subscription is created, message credits should only be set if the dispatcher is not null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868791#action_12868791 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2559: I was as blind as a bat there. I completely

Re: Added WCF, Security, Reliability, etc. to Programming in Apache Qpid

On 05/18/2010 04:55 PM, Jonathan Robie wrote: I've made a lot of changes to Programming in Apache Qpid - feedback would be great! The WCF section, of course, was written by Cliff Jansen - I should have been more careful when writing that email ... Jonathan

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2559) When a subscription is created, message credits should only be set if the dispatcher is not null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868834#action_12868834 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2559: I think I need to investigate why the

RE: Added WCF, Security, Reliability, etc. to Programming in Apache Qpid

Hi Jonathan, I've made a lot of changes to Programming in Apache Qpid - feedback would be great! Until we have the new web pages set up, I'm keeping built versions here: http://people.apache.org/~jonathan/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid.pdf

[jira] Closed: (QPID-2309) Windows installer doesn't set up Start menu items for Broker or Qpid docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Huston closed QPID-2309. -- Fix Version/s: 0.6 Resolution: Fixed The cmake install mechanism was ditched prior to qpid 0.6

Destination based flow control and it's affect on session level heuristics

In the JMS client we use the prefetch value in determining two important heuristics in addition to using it for flow control. 1. We use the prefetch value to determine the batch size for message acks. Ex. if ack mode is auto-ack or dups-ok-ack and if unackedCount = prefetch/2 then we flush

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2515) Need to be able to set flow control in Java on a per destination level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1286#action_1286 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2515: Added support for this at rev 945945 in