[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sorin Suciu updated QPID-2824:
--
Attachment: qpid-2824.patch
Use toLogString rather than toString on LogSubject(s) and add a new
Hi,
I am working to extend the operational logging framework to apply to
0-10 code path as well.
In doing so I would like to:
- modify the LogSubject toString method to read toLogString so I can
implement the interface in the 0-10 objects
- log via a generic actor as the current actor model is
Hi Sorin,
Thanks for the info.
I've had a read through of the JIRAs, I think the interface/implementation
changes look good with an eye on 1-0 introduction too.
Thanks,
Marnie
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Sorin S. ssu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working to extend the operational
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell reassigned QPID-2822:
Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
Move the documentation from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2822.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patches applied.
Move the documentation from
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone on the list can shed list on why the details
contained in the new docbook format doesn't come back on the front page of
Google search results - where the wiki previously did.
For example, information on the Qpid Java FAQ comes back from cwiki but not
from the docbook
All,
I'd like to propose a timeline for the next Qpid release - with a target of
end October.
IIRC, we usually take trunk as stable/defect fixing only for 2 weeks before
release so that would take us back to 18th Oct for the start of that period.
The work I'm closest to, 0-10 implementation on
The class o.a.q.transport.Sink is not used and can be safely removed
Key: QPID-2825
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2825
Project: Qpid
Issue Type:
Basically it just still needs finished, and only once its more
prominent on the website (the FAQ links still point to the wiki
export) will it start being favoured for search results.
Robbie
On 27 August 2010 16:16, Marnie McCormack
marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sorin Suciu updated QPID-2825:
--
Attachment: qpid-2825.patch
The class o.a.q.transport.Sink is not used and can be safely removed
Hi Tim,
The broker is language independent from a client perspective. All it knows
about from clients is the messages it receives which could be from a client
written in any language as long as it builds the messages correctly. So you
can have JMS clients sending messages through a C++
The class o.a.q.transport.Result is not used and can be safely removed
--
Key: QPID-2826
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2826
Project: Qpid
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sorin Suciu updated QPID-2826:
--
Attachment: qpid-2826.patch
The class o.a.q.transport.Result is not used and can be safely removed
Do you mean this is item specific - it seemed to me from other searches that
only the top level strings come back in the first searches and that text in
the docbook pages doesn't score highly ?
Thanks,
Marnie
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.comwrote:
I just meant that many of the docbook pages (mostly Java related) aren't
complete and we don't link to them as prominently, which won't help their
chance of being ranked similarly. We also probably aren't helping their
cause by having both possible results in the first place.
We don't link
QPID Cpp WinSDK does not contain 64-bit libraries
-
Key: QPID-2827
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2827
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Environment: Windows
cc:ing the list, as I think this may be interesting for others.
On 8/27/10 7:18 AM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:13 -0700, aafabbri wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Just curious if you observed any performance gains from your commit (below).
Chances are you haven't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2771.
--
Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
Resolution: Fixed
Patches applied.
Use plugins rather than
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:32 -0700, a fabbri wrote:
...
I've not tested, but I'd be very surprised.
IIRC, my strace of qpidd and client showed a ton of setsigprocmask()
syscalls. These are not cheap. I haven't retested with this new code
yet, but I'll be happy to see those useless (in
On 27 Aug 2010, at 16:16, Marnie McCormack wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone on the list can shed list on why the details
contained in the new docbook format doesn't come back on the front
page of
Google search results - where the wiki previously did.
For example, information on the Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12903571#action_12903571
]
Steve Huston commented on QPID-2827:
FWIW, 64-bit packages are usually separate from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chuck Rolke updated QPID-2827:
--
Attachment: x64-qwip-07.patch
Rooted at qpid\cpp this patch adds support and process for build a 64-bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12903575#action_12903575
]
Chuck Rolke commented on QPID-2827:
---
Steve, right. The procedure builds two separate .zip
Steve,
How's the Wireshark dissector working? I'm keen to use any improvements
you might make for that tool.
Regards,
-Chuck
- Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com wrote:
From: Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:07:19 PM GMT -05:00
Hi Marnie,
I'd like to propose a timeline for the next Qpid release -
with a target of end October.
IIRC, we usually take trunk as stable/defect fixing only for
2 weeks before release so that would take us back to 18th Oct
for the start of that period.
That sounds good to me.
-Steve
jmx management console can NPE when adding a queue to the navigation tree after
its MBean has just been unregistered but before the view is refreshed
Hi Chuck,
How's the Wireshark dissector working? I'm keen to use any
improvements you might make for that tool.
It's done. I'm working with the customer to work out how it gets back to
the wireshark source repository.
-Steve
- Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com wrote:
From: Steve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-2828:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
jmx management console can NPE when adding a queue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-2788:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
jmx management console can throw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell reassigned QPID-2615:
Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
JMX Management Console fails to connect to 0.5 and below brokers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12903598#action_12903598
]
Chuck Rolke commented on QPID-2827:
---
Also note that a 32-bit Windows system will skip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-2615:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
JMX Management Console fails to connect to 0.5 and
On 27 Aug 2010, at 12:28, Sorin S. wrote:
Hi,
I am working to extend the operational logging framework to apply to
0-10 code path as well.
In doing so I would like to:
- modify the LogSubject toString method to read toLogString so I can
implement the interface in the 0-10 objects
- log via a
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:32 -0700, a fabbri wrote:
...
I've not tested, but I'd be very surprised.
IIRC, my strace of qpidd and client showed a ton of setsigprocmask()
syscalls. These are not cheap. I haven't
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your mail, I really appreciate your insight. Will try and
make it work on 0-10 in the first step with the GenericActor, then
will be more than happy to implement your suggestions. If anyone has
any objections to this plan, I would be more than happy
to learn about them.
Does anyone regularly build the linux C++ stuff outside of the source tree?
That is, you're supposed to be able to run configure and make from a
build directory outside of qpid/cpp. I seem to have more build issues
this way though.
Hi,
I am sure you noticed there are dependencies on the specification, eg:
configure.ac:specdir=`pwd`/$srcdir/../specs
did you worked around this? Curious to hear what issues you encountered.
Cheers,
Sorin
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:55 AM, a fabbri ajfab...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone
37 matches
Mail list logo
