Re: 0.12 release update - RC1 is out

2011-07-20 Thread Keith Wall
Hello I tested the Java components of RC1 today and encountered no issues. Specifically I used qpid-java-0.12-rc1.tar.gz and qpid-jmx-management-console-0.12-macosx.zip, ran up the broker, and performed various tests using Drain/Spout whilst observing the console. No issues encountered. Used

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3366) qpid get stuck under heavy load

2011-07-20 Thread Francesco Emmi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13068220#comment-13068220 ] Francesco Emmi commented on QPID-3366: -- Hi, I' ve just seen that the big frame is

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3367) FileUtils improvements

2011-07-20 Thread Keith Wall (JIRA)
FileUtils improvements -- Key: QPID-3367 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3367 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Common Reporter: Keith Wall Assignee:

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3304) Tagged federation messages in a transaction can cause subsequent dequeue to fail

2011-07-20 Thread Kim van der Riet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13068300#comment-13068300 ] Kim van der Riet commented on QPID-3304: Further note on reproducing this error

Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

2011-07-20 Thread Alan Conway
On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Folks, Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to incorporate the feedback provided during the last week. And I have tried to limit the proposed feature set a bit more. Opinions welcome, thanks - -K # Message Groups ## Status Draft

Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

2011-07-20 Thread Ken Giusti
Alan - thanks for the input, replies inline -K - Original Message - On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Folks, Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to incorporate the feedback provided during the last week. And I have tried to limit the proposed feature

Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

2011-07-20 Thread Alan Conway
On 07/20/2011 11:57 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Alan - thanks for the input, replies inline -K - Original Message - On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Folks, Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to incorporate the feedback provided during the last week. And I have

Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

2011-07-20 Thread Gordon Sim
On 07/20/2011 04:57 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: - Original Message - On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: For #2: The key for the header that contains the group identifier would be provided to the broker via configuration. A fixed name like 'qpid.group' seems less likely to confuse.

Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

2011-07-20 Thread Ken Giusti
Responses inline: -K - Original Message - On 07/20/2011 11:57 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Alan - thanks for the input, replies inline -K - Original Message - On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Folks, Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to

Running store.py tests on the RH msgstore

2011-07-20 Thread Alan Conway
I noticed cpp/src/tests/store.py which is only used in the Cmake build. I assume it's testing the windows store. Is this a generic enough test that we could run it against the RH store as well? We could take a similar approach as cluster_tests.py which has store-specific tests.

Re: 0.12 release update - RC1 is out

2011-07-20 Thread jross
Keith, it helps a great deal. Thank you for taking a look. Justin On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Keith Wall wrote: Hello I tested the Java components of RC1 today and encountered no issues. Specifically I used qpid-java-0.12-rc1.tar.gz and qpid-jmx-management-console-0.12-macosx.zip, ran up the

Re: 0.12 release update - RC1 is out

2011-07-20 Thread Cliff Jansen
The WCF client builds and runs fine also. This also required building and using C++ broker and client components too (on Windows). Cliff On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, everyone.  Today I produced RC1 from revision 1146605:  

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3368) Check for dirty session after failover during commit() not in the correct place

2011-07-20 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar (JIRA)
Check for dirty session after failover during commit() not in the correct place --- Key: QPID-3368 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3368 Project: Qpid

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3368) Check for dirty session after failover during commit() not in the correct place

2011-07-20 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddhesh Poyarekar updated QPID-3368: - Attachment: TxFailover.java Test program to reproduce the issue. Check for dirty

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3368) Check for dirty session after failover during commit() not in the correct place

2011-07-20 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddhesh Poyarekar updated QPID-3368: - Attachment: qpid-java-check-failover.patch The patch. Changes in this patch: * Created