Hello
I tested the Java components of RC1 today and encountered no issues.
Specifically I used qpid-java-0.12-rc1.tar.gz and
qpid-jmx-management-console-0.12-macosx.zip, ran up the broker, and
performed various tests using Drain/Spout whilst observing the console.
No issues encountered. Used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13068220#comment-13068220
]
Francesco Emmi commented on QPID-3366:
--
Hi,
I' ve just seen that the big frame is
FileUtils improvements
--
Key: QPID-3367
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3367
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java Common
Reporter: Keith Wall
Assignee:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13068300#comment-13068300
]
Kim van der Riet commented on QPID-3304:
Further note on reproducing this error
On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Folks,
Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to incorporate the feedback
provided during the last week. And I have tried to limit the proposed feature
set a bit more.
Opinions welcome, thanks -
-K
# Message Groups
## Status
Draft
Alan - thanks for the input, replies inline
-K
- Original Message -
On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Folks,
Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to incorporate the
feedback provided during the last week. And I have tried to limit
the proposed feature
On 07/20/2011 11:57 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Alan - thanks for the input, replies inline
-K
- Original Message -
On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Folks,
Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to incorporate the
feedback provided during the last week. And I have
On 07/20/2011 04:57 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
- Original Message -
On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
For #2:
The key for the header that contains the group identifier would be
provided to
the broker via configuration.
A fixed name like 'qpid.group' seems less likely to confuse.
Responses inline:
-K
- Original Message -
On 07/20/2011 11:57 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Alan - thanks for the input, replies inline
-K
- Original Message -
On 07/01/2011 07:04 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Folks,
Here's a second draft of the proposal. I've tried to
I noticed cpp/src/tests/store.py which is only used in the Cmake build. I assume
it's testing the windows store.
Is this a generic enough test that we could run it against the RH store as well?
We could take a similar approach as cluster_tests.py which has store-specific tests.
Keith, it helps a great deal. Thank you for taking a look.
Justin
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Keith Wall wrote:
Hello
I tested the Java components of RC1 today and encountered no issues.
Specifically I used qpid-java-0.12-rc1.tar.gz and
qpid-jmx-management-console-0.12-macosx.zip, ran up the
The WCF client builds and runs fine also. This also required building
and using C++ broker and client components too (on Windows).
Cliff
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings, everyone. Today I produced RC1 from revision 1146605:
Check for dirty session after failover during commit() not in the correct place
---
Key: QPID-3368
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3368
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siddhesh Poyarekar updated QPID-3368:
-
Attachment: TxFailover.java
Test program to reproduce the issue.
Check for dirty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siddhesh Poyarekar updated QPID-3368:
-
Attachment: qpid-java-check-failover.patch
The patch. Changes in this patch:
* Created
15 matches
Mail list logo