[GitHub] qpid-proton-j issue #12: PROTON-1690 JMH Benchmarks for baseline performance...

2017-12-05 Thread franz1981
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton-j/pull/12 @gemmellr @tabish121 I've used the [JMH visualizer](http://jmh.morethan.io/) to compare the performances of Symbols before/after the last improvements from @tabish121 and that's what I've

[GitHub] qpid-proton-j issue #12: PROTON-1690 JMH Benchmarks for baseline performance...

2017-12-05 Thread franz1981
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton-j/pull/12 Thanks @gemmellr I've tried to fix the PR using your good advices :+1: And I ask your and @tabish121 help to check if the content of each benchmark respect somehow what kind of baseline

[GitHub] qpid-proton-j issue #12: PROTON-1690 JMH Benchmarks for baseline performance...

2017-11-24 Thread gemmellr
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton-j/pull/12 Hi Franz Thanks for the PR. I have some feedback for changes that would be good and/or necessary. The JMH dependencies are not ALv2 compatible and so I think we should make

[GitHub] qpid-proton-j issue #12: PROTON-1690 JMH Benchmarks for baseline performance...

2017-11-18 Thread franz1981
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton-j/pull/12 @gemmellr @tabish121 Guys, let me know if it seems reasonable (in form and content) and do not hesitate to propose other benchmarks too: I've added the first that I've found looking to some