On 11/11/2010 12:45 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
On 11/11/2010 09:34 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 11/10/2010 01:03 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
In my mind the ideal is that when creating a dist, the full source for all
possible modules are included regardless of whether the deps for those are
available at
On 11/10/2010 07:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
There was a similar issue noted for 0.6
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2316) but as no one replied when
I asked people to look at it I just ended up nudging it out to 0.9 and
ensuring I had the relevant dependencies installed for RC1. It
On 11/10/2010 01:03 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
In my mind the ideal is that when creating a dist, the full source for
all possible modules are included regardless of whether the deps for
those are available at the time of creation. That way you ease the
burden of getting the system setup for
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com wrote:
Is there a new recommended version of the c++ persistent
store module for 0.8?
Which OS?
CentOS 5.5.
This FAQ should be updated when 0.8 is released:
On 11/10/2010 11:20 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
build it on a platform with deps install. that seems less error prone.
Actually I think that ensuring the distribution is 'complete'
regardless of the existence of dependencies on the platform it was
built is less error prone.
The question in my
On 11/10/2010 05:41 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 11/10/2010 11:20 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
build it on a platform with deps install. that seems less error prone.
Actually I think that ensuring the distribution is 'complete'
regardless of the existence of dependencies on the platform it was
built
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 18:03 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
...
In my mind the ideal is that when creating a dist, the full source for
all possible modules are included regardless of whether the deps for
those are available at the time of creation. That way you ease the
burden of getting the
-Original Message-
From: Craig Forbes [mailto:cfor...@qualys.com]
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Steve Huston
shus...@riverace.com wrote:
Is there a new recommended version of the c++ persistent
store module
for 0.8?
Which OS?
CentOS 5.5.
Not sure... Carl? Kim?
due to missing cluster artefacts (was Re: 0.8 RC1
available for download)
On 11/10/2010 05:41 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 11/10/2010 11:20 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
build it on a platform with deps install. that seems less error
prone.
Actually I think that ensuring the distribution
to
turn it on will figure the rest out (if only due to the comment in the
config file saying so...).
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: 10 November 2010 12:23
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: java broker startup issue (was Re: 0.8 RC1 available
Eastern
Subject: 0.8 RC1 available for download
Hi all,
0.8 RC1 can be found for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.8/RC1/
Output from running RAT across the 'full release' archive can be found
at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.8/0.8rc1_rat_output.txt
about it at some point.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: 10 November 2010 14:32
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: 0.8 RC1 available for download
On 11/08/2010 08:47 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
0.8 RC1 can be found for download at:
http
RC's.
Regards,
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Rolke [mailto:cro...@redhat.com]
Sent: 10 November 2010 21:54
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: 0.8 RC1 available for download
Qpid .NET Messaging binding seems OK.
It is not called out specially. It's buried in qpid-cpp-0.8
Hi all,
0.8 RC1 can be found for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.8/RC1/
Output from running RAT across the 'full release' archive can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.8/0.8rc1_rat_output.txt
*Please* take the time to download and try out this release
14 matches
Mail list logo
