Hi Aidan,
- Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Cliff Jansen (Interop Systems Inc)
v-clj...@microsoft.com wrote:
My impression has been that WCF is purely an RPC abstraction. Does
it
offer traditional messaging semantics as well?
Yes. For
Oh and one more point of clarity:
Both ART and WCF are proprietary technologies albeit WCF being the defacto new
std on .NET.
ART is very niche and becoming less relevant.
William
- William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Aidan,
- Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote:
by changing a configuration file, in the same way a Java
application can switch JMS providers without code changes.
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: Aidan Skinner [mailto:aidan.skin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid .NET
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote:
We have (to the best of my knowledge) no requriements spec for either
implementation, functional or non-functional.
I think the basic requirement for a client is to allow a user to
I'm interested.
Jonathan
Marnie McCormack wrote:
All,
We are currently in a somewhat interesting situation wrt to .NET clients in
Qpid. I thought it might be helpful to get together the group of interested
parties to agree the best way forward for the existing clients, and also to
do some
I would be very interested to join the conference call. Thanks.
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: Marnie McCormack [mailto:marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:53 AM
To: qpid-...@apache.org
Subject: Qpid .NET Strategy - Interested ?
All,
We are currently
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
http://www.mono-project.com/SystemMessaging (there was also an attempt
to implement it on top of our 0-8 client but that
Robert Greig wrote:
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
http://www.mono-project.com/SystemMessaging (there was also an attempt
to implement it on top of our
+1 re WCF. WCF makes it much easier.
- Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org:
I think System.Messaging is probably more relevant to .Net, this is
the route that Mono has gone down with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ:
http://www.mono-project.com/SystemMessaging
10 matches
Mail list logo
