Re: New Plug-in Architecture for the Java Broker

2010-06-30 Thread Danushka Menikkumbura
Hi Andrew, I spent fair amount of time looking at how to hookup one OSGi runtime with another but could not find anything. I am more than happy if that is possible because I am doing something that I am not intended to do. Please let me know if you think there is a better approach. Thanks, Danush

Re: New Plug-in Architecture for the Java Broker

2010-06-30 Thread Andrew Kennedy
On 30 June 2010 03:42, Danushka Menikkumbura wrote: > Devs, > > Any other idea on this?. Please provide your feedback. > > Thanks, > Danushka > > > Hi Sorin, >> >> I am not saying OSGi does not fit into the broker. Undoubtedly we should >> OSGi-fy the broker at some point. That will add modularity

Re: New Plug-in Architecture for the Java Broker

2010-06-29 Thread Danushka Menikkumbura
Devs, Any other idea on this?. Please provide your feedback. Thanks, Danushka Hi Sorin, > > I am not saying OSGi does not fit into the broker. Undoubtedly we should > OSGi-fy the broker at some point. That will add modularity, multiple version > support, hot deployment/update, etc into the brok

Re: New Plug-in Architecture for the Java Broker

2010-06-29 Thread Danushka Menikkumbura
Hi Sorin, I am not saying OSGi does not fit into the broker. Undoubtedly we should OSGi-fy the broker at some point. That will add modularity, multiple version support, hot deployment/update, etc into the broker. What I am saying is that the way OSGi is used in the current plug-in architecture doe

Re: New Plug-in Architecture for the Java Broker

2010-06-29 Thread Sorin S.
Hi Danushka, Sorry, I am not exactly following but was wondering if you could elaborate on why OSGI does not fit in qpid java broker? For example I see ActiveMQ, ServiceMix, etc are using OSGI as well (not embedded as we do). Thank you, Sorin On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Danushka Menikkumb

Re: New Plug-in Architecture for the Java Broker

2010-06-29 Thread Danushka Menikkumbura
Hi Sorin, To me the issue is not being able to use Qpid in another OSGi-fied application. Lets leave that aside for a while. Still I doubt OSGi fits in here. To me its like doing procedural programming inside OOP. There is nothing wrong with it; but why one would do that?. Thanks, Danushka On Tu

Re: New Plug-in Architecture for the Java Broker

2010-06-29 Thread Sorin S.
Hi Danushka, What benefits would have this approach versus the current OSGI mechanism (leaving aside the embedded felix)? Thank you, Sorin On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Please provide your feedback on [1]. > > [1] -  https://issues.apache.org/jir