Hi Justin,
I've run some tests against the Java Broker 0-16 RC3 and encountered no issues.
Details of tests run:
used java Drain/Spout examples to publish/receive messages to/from
Java Broker. monitored queues using Java Broker Management Console.
No issues found.
Kind Regards,
Alex
On 05/08/2012 10:03 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:52:32AM -0500, Steve Huston wrote:
What kind of fd is this? Linux?
Yes. There's a class named Prong that creates a one-way pipe for sending
a notification to the Ruby thread to wake it up. The pipe is created
using the
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:33:58AM -0400, Alan Conway wrote:
On 05/08/2012 10:03 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:52:32AM -0500, Steve Huston wrote:
What kind of fd is this? Linux?
Yes. There's a class named Prong that creates a one-way pipe for sending
a notification
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271399#comment-13271399
]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-3979:
---
In general the change looks good. I have one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271401#comment-13271401
]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-3980:
---
Change looks good to me
Last value
Weston M. Price created QPID-3990:
-
Summary: Multiple XAResources isSameRM behavior
Key: QPID-3990
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3990
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Weston M. Price created QPID-3991:
-
Summary: QpidMessageHandler should be selective in tearing down
and re-establishing Connection/Sessions on AMQException
Key: QPID-3991
URL:
Hi,
I wanted to understand where we stand on the release AMQP 1.0 vs. the current
broker implementation based on version 0-10 of the AMPQ standard. Are all
implementations proceeding to the 1.0 AMQP release standard and where can I
find out what the schedules are? I would like to use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271617#comment-13271617
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3990:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271620#comment-13271620
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3990:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271625#comment-13271625
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3990:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271720#comment-13271720
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-3984:
---
Reviewed by me. Approved for 0.16.
Hi Nitin,
Some work has begun on AMQP 1.0 for the C++ side but I'm not aware of any
planned date for when it may be available for wider use.
As far as I know, the intent of the qpid::messaging client API is that it
will enable one to move to the AMQP 1.0 standard without (or with minimal)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271770#comment-13271770
]
Alan Conway commented on QPID-3984:
---
Merged to 0.16 branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Conway resolved QPID-3984.
---
Resolution: Fixed
HA tests fail in distribution
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-3936:
-
Attachment: 0001-QPID-3936-producer-participant-can-be-interrupt-mess.patch
Patch: Producer participant
On 2012-04-06 11:06:40, Rob Godfrey wrote:
Agree with all of Robbie's comments, and added a few more of my own...
The work in general looks good, but a) we really need testing on this as it
has caused us so many issues in the past and b) we need to do the work to
integrate this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13271871#comment-13271871
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401:
-
bq. On
Hi. I've now produced 0.16-rc4 at the following location:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc4/
It has just one change beyond RC3, r1336378, which disables the HA tests
if required test tools are not in the environment (Thanks, Alan).
There was one other issue with RC3 that Cajus
Hi Justin,
I think it would be good to prepare the final artifacts (some seem
like they could just be renamed, but others indicate RC4 in their
content) so we can test them before we vote, and signing them would
also allow the maven artifacts to be deployed to a staging repo and
tested in advance
20 matches
Mail list logo
