[jira] Created: (QPID-2811) Rationalise 0-10 Transport Interface

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Rationalise 0-10 Transport Interface Key: QPID-2811 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2811 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Broker, Java Client, Java Common

[jira] Created: (QPID-2812) Update 0-10 connection configuration mechanism and properties

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Update 0-10 connection configuration mechanism and properties - Key: QPID-2812 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2812 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Created: (QPID-2813) Update current 0-10 socket connection to conform to new mechanism

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Update current 0-10 socket connection to conform to new mechanism - Key: QPID-2813 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2813 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Created: (QPID-2814) Create MINA InVM 0-10 Transport

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Create MINA InVM 0-10 Transport --- Key: QPID-2814 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2814 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Broker, Java Client Affects Versions:

[jira] Created: (QPID-2815) Make InVM broker startup protocol independent

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Make InVM broker startup protocol independent - Key: QPID-2815 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2815 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.7

[jira] Created: (QPID-2816) Create TCP based 0-10 MINA transport

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Create TCP based 0-10 MINA transport Key: QPID-2816 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2816 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.7 Reporter: Andrew

[jira] Created: (QPID-2817) Connection::close() may hang if broker is suspended

2010-08-20 Thread Gordon Sim (JIRA)
Connection::close() may hang if broker is suspended --- Key: QPID-2817 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2817 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: C++ Client

[jira] Created: (QPID-2818) Make Transport mechanisms into OSGi plugins

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Make Transport mechanisms into OSGi plugins --- Key: QPID-2818 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2818 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Broker, Java Client

[jira] Created: (QPID-2819) Add additional pluggable transport mechanisms

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
Add additional pluggable transport mechanisms - Key: QPID-2819 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2819 Project: Qpid Issue Type: New Feature Components: Java Broker, Java

Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy
Hi. I'm currently looking at the 0-10 transport layer in more detail, and want to add a (currently) MINA based VM mechanism to the existing socket based one, and eventually I envisage pluggable OSGi modules that implement Netty or Grizzly transports for both the client and the broker, using any

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2817) Connection::close() may hang if broker is suspended

2010-08-20 Thread Gordon Sim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved QPID-2817. -- Resolution: Fixed Connection::close() may hang if broker is suspended

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 08/20/2010 05:45 AM, Andrew Kennedy wrote: Hi. I'm currently looking at the 0-10 transport layer in more detail, and want to add a (currently) MINA based VM mechanism to the existing socket based one, and eventually I envisage pluggable OSGi modules that implement Netty or Grizzly transports

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Carl Trieloff
I still think it needs debate, For example, the discussion has been put forward to add in the new API model in Java between JMS and the transports. This is needed. How does that relate to this? This discussing needs to be had a bit more broadly so that all involved in the client can contribute

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Let me read through and comment on the individual JIRA's and then maybe I can post a summary of my views here. Rajith On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote: I still think it needs debate, For example, the discussion has been put forward to add in the new

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2798) C++ Messaging Client .NET binding fails to clone managed objects correctly

2010-08-20 Thread Ted Ross (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross resolved QPID-2798. Assignee: Ted Ross Fix Version/s: 0.7 Resolution: Fixed C++ Messaging Client .NET binding

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-2785) QpidTypes.pdb is not installed

2010-08-20 Thread Ted Ross (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2785: -- Assignee: Ted Ross QpidTypes.pdb is not installed --

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Robert Godfrey
On 20 August 2010 15:48, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote: I still think it needs debate, For example, the discussion has been put forward to add in the new API model in Java between JMS and the transports. This is needed. How does that relate to this? This discussing needs to be

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2785) QpidTypes.pdb is not installed

2010-08-20 Thread Ted Ross (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross resolved QPID-2785. Fix Version/s: 0.7 Resolution: Fixed QpidTypes.pdb is not installed --

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2805) The windows resource version for qmfengine dll is hard coded to an unusable value

2010-08-20 Thread Ted Ross (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross resolved QPID-2805. Fix Version/s: 0.7 Resolution: Fixed The windows resource version for qmfengine dll is hard coded

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2811) Rationalise 0-10 Transport Interface

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900716#action_12900716 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2811: Andrew, Could you please be more specific

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2813) Update current 0-10 socket connection to conform to new mechanism

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900718#action_12900718 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2813: Again, I would like to see what the new

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2818) Make Transport mechanisms into OSGi plugins

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900722#action_12900722 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2818: While I am not again making the transports

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 08/20/2010 10:15 AM, Robert Godfrey wrote: On 20 August 2010 15:48, Carl Trieloffcctriel...@redhat.com wrote: I still think it needs debate, For example, the discussion has been put forward to add in the new API model in Java between JMS and the transports. This is needed. How does

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2811) Rationalise 0-10 Transport Interface

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900726#action_12900726 ] Andrew Kennedy commented on QPID-2811: -- This is pretty much what I'm doing, actually,

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (QPID-2811) Rationalise 0-10 Transport Interface

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900726#action_12900726 ] Andrew Kennedy edited comment on QPID-2811 at 8/20/10 11:13 AM:

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2818) Make Transport mechanisms into OSGi plugins

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900725#action_12900725 ] Andrew Kennedy commented on QPID-2818: -- Not explained very well. The modules that

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu
First of all, I appreciate that there are several JIRA's opened identifying the areas that Andrew is hoping to work. I have gone through the JIRA's and made some comments. In general I am quite happy about getting the transport code sorted out. As mentioned in QPID-2811, I have made some

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2811) Rationalise 0-10 Transport Interface

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900730#action_12900730 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2811: -1 on removing the ability to load a

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2811) Rationalise 0-10 Transport Interface

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900733#action_12900733 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2811: The IoTransport class is not used in the

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy
On 20 August 2010 16:16, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see the following in any future work carried out in the area. 1. Move the additional transport code out of common module. This is a very important requirement for me as I would like to get rid of the MINA

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2807) More flexible acknowledgement

2010-08-20 Thread Gordon Sim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved QPID-2807. -- Resolution: Fixed More flexible acknowledgement - Key:

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Rafael Schloming
Robert Godfrey wrote: On 20 August 2010 15:48, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote: I still think it needs debate, For example, the discussion has been put forward to add in the new API model in Java between JMS and the transports. This is needed. How does that relate to this? This

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Andrew Kennedy andrewinternatio...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 August 2010 16:16, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see the following in any future work carried out in the area. 1. Move the additional transport code out of common module.

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Kennedy
Also, I should point out that the JIRA that mentions OSGi is purely in a 'Nice to have' category, and isn't something I expect to be working on at any time in the near future... The important part of this is consolidating and improving the transport layer. I expect that the ability to add an OSGi

Re: Updating the 0-10 Java transport layer

2010-08-20 Thread Bryan Kearney
On 08/20/2010 11:04 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote: On 08/20/2010 10:15 AM, Robert Godfrey wrote: On 20 August 2010 15:48, Carl Trieloffcctriel...@redhat.com wrote: I still think it needs debate, For example, the discussion has been put forward to add in the new API model in Java between JMS and the