Re: Calling all MessageStore implementors

2010-10-05 Thread Alan Conway
On 10/04/2010 04:37 PM, Steve Huston wrote: Hi Alan, I am planning to refactor the cluster code to use the MessageStore interaface (a cluster stores a message by replicating it.) Ok. This will entail some changes to MessageStore. I know of one implementation at

Qpid 0.8 Release - Documentation

2010-10-05 Thread Marnie McCormack
Hi All, So we're starting the countdown towards release. I wonder what we need to do on the docs front and if it's integrated into the release/dist tools ? Are other people's docs for 0.8 already in svn as part of the existing 0.7 docbook ? I've got a couple of docs to put into the docbook, but

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-2720) Qpid broker can not run inside an OSGi container

2010-10-05 Thread Andrew Kennedy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Kennedy reassigned QPID-2720: Assignee: Andrew Kennedy (was: Danushka Menikkumbura) Qpid broker can not run inside an

QPID-2893: Changes to MessageStore interface to support new cluster design.

2010-10-05 Thread Alan Conway
I've outlined the changes I think I'll need to make to MessageStore in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2893, lets use that JIRA for discussion. - Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project:

[jira] Created: (QPID-2893) Changes to MessageStore interface to support new cluster design.

2010-10-05 Thread Alan Conway (JIRA)
Changes to MessageStore interface to support new cluster design. Key: QPID-2893 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2893 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement

Re: Qpid 0.8 Release - Documentation

2010-10-05 Thread Jonathan Robie
On 10/05/2010 10:04 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: Hi All, So we're starting the countdown towards release. I wonder what we need to do on the docs front and if it's integrated into the release/dist tools ? Are other people's docs for 0.8 already in svn as part of the existing 0.7 docbook ? We

patch: Don't access after delete in RdmaServer.cpp

2010-10-05 Thread Aaron Fabbri
Just noticed this when reading the Rdma transport unit test code: Index: RdmaServer.cpp === --- RdmaServer.cpp (revision 1004875) +++ RdmaServer.cpp (working copy) @@ -118,18 +118,18 @@ ConRec* cr =

Re: patch: Don't access after delete in RdmaServer.cpp

2010-10-05 Thread Aaron Fabbri
Actually, use this patch.. it fixes an additional use-after-free. Index: RdmaServer.cpp === --- RdmaServer.cpp (revision 1004875) +++ RdmaServer.cpp (working copy) @@ -118,18 +118,18 @@ ConRec* cr =