Re: Can I get

2012-05-23 Thread Gordon Sim
On 05/22/2012 07:02 PM, Nitin Shah wrote: Hi, I have just downloaded the 0.16 version of the C++ broker and client code. I wanted to run some performance numbers. I see that on the Qpid apache web pages there is mention of the perftest one can run. However, can someone point me to the tests and

qpid::amqp_0_10::Connection::encode() produces zero-length frames

2012-05-23 Thread Florian Weimer
Hi, the Qpid broker invokes encode() with a buffer size of 65536 bytes. If a frame of 65536 bytes is about to be sent, there is room for it in the buffer, and the first while loop is entered. But the underlying codec cannot express this frame size on the wire, it writes a 16-bit zero

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4014) System test ConflationQueueTest.testParallelProductionAndConsumption failed

2012-05-23 Thread Philip Harvey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281584#comment-13281584 ] Philip Harvey commented on QPID-4014: - I've just seen this problem occur again. I

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4014) System test ConflationQueueTest.testParallelProductionAndConsumption failed

2012-05-23 Thread Philip Harvey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Harvey updated QPID-4014: Attachment:

Re: qpid::amqp_0_10::Connection::encode() produces zero-length frames

2012-05-23 Thread Gordon Sim
On 05/23/2012 02:10 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: Hi, the Qpid broker invokes encode() with a buffer size of 65536 bytes. If a frame of 65536 bytes is about to be sent, there is room for it in the buffer, and the first while loop is entered. But the underlying codec cannot express this frame size

[jira] [Comment Edited] (QPID-4014) System test ConflationQueueTest.testParallelProductionAndConsumption failed

2012-05-23 Thread Philip Harvey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281584#comment-13281584 ] Philip Harvey edited comment on QPID-4014 at 5/23/12 1:15 PM: --

Re: qpid::amqp_0_10::Connection::encode() produces zero-length frames

2012-05-23 Thread Florian Weimer
On 05/23/2012 03:19 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: I would have expected that such over-sized frames are fragmented. Is this actually implemented somewhere in the code? Yes, in qpid::framing::SendContent (for broker) and Thanks. This seems to apply to message.transfer contents only, and not to

Re: qpid::amqp_0_10::Connection::encode() produces zero-length frames

2012-05-23 Thread Gordon Sim
On 05/23/2012 03:11 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/23/2012 03:19 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: I would have expected that such over-sized frames are fragmented. Is this actually implemented somewhere in the code? Yes, in qpid::framing::SendContent (for broker) and Thanks. This seems to apply to

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4009) Make failover method invocation timeout configurable for 0-8/0-9/0-9-1 amqp clients

2012-05-23 Thread Alex Rudyy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Rudyy updated QPID-4009: - Attachment: 0001-QPID-4009-Make-failover-method-invocation-timeout-co.patch Attached a patch making

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-4009) Make failover method invocation timeout configurable for 0-8/0-9/0-9-1 amqp clients

2012-05-23 Thread Alex Rudyy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Rudyy reassigned QPID-4009: Assignee: Philip Harvey (was: Alex Rudyy) Phil, Could you please review the patch attached?

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4009) Make failover method invocation timeout configurable for 0-8/0-9/0-9-1 amqp clients

2012-05-23 Thread Alex Rudyy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Rudyy updated QPID-4009: - Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) Make failover method invocation timeout configurable for

Re: cmake build issues

2012-05-23 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 18:43 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote: I'm getting compile errors when trying to build using cmake. Ex. /home/rajith/workspace/git-qpid/qpid/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/client/LoadPlugins.cpp: In constructor ‘qpid::client::{anonymous}::LoadtimeInitialise::LoadtimeInitialise()’:

Re: cmake build issues

2012-05-23 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Andrew, I did the following, mkdir qpid-build cd qpid-build cmake ../qpid/qpid/cpp make Anything missing ? Rajith On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.comwrote: On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 18:43 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote: I'm getting compile errors when trying to

Re: cmake build issues

2012-05-23 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:19 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Andrew, I did the following, mkdir qpid-build cd qpid-build cmake ../qpid/qpid/cpp make Anything missing ? That should be enough. But I have sneaking suspicion that it wasn't a clean source tree. Did you run an autotools build

Re: cmake build issues

2012-05-23 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Ok that was the issue. I have run an auto tools build before. How do I clean up ? or do I have to nuke the dir and checkout again ? Rajith On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.comwrote: On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:19 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Andrew, I did the

Re: cmake build issues

2012-05-23 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:27 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Ok that was the issue. I have run an auto tools build before. How do I clean up ? or do I have to nuke the dir and checkout again ? Going nuclear is always my preferred option! git clean should do the trick (assuming you're using git)

Re: cmake build issues

2012-05-23 Thread Rajith Attapattu
I use git, so I will try git clean first :D Failing which I will remove my local copy and go from scratch. Thanks again for your help. Rajith On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.comwrote: On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:27 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Ok that was the

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-1133) Poller implementation based on the Solaris Event Completion Framework

2012-05-23 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13282124#comment-13282124 ] Andrew Stitcher commented on QPID-1133: --- We now have a poll() based Poller

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-1133) Poller implementation based on the Solaris Event Completion Framework

2012-05-23 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Stitcher resolved QPID-1133. --- Resolution: Later No pressing need to do this since we've had the poll() based Poller.