Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
Github user ChugR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/19#issuecomment-148835284
How do we manage these credentials internally? Or when viewed through the
management interface?
Will 'qdmanage query' show the credentials in plain text
Github user ChugR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/21#issuecomment-149681423
I tried this new branch and I think it's better for tests (*.py) all to end
up in the /tests folder.
At first the test failed. The problem was that the *.pyc
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/97
DISPATCH-468: Use computed x.509 cert display-name as authenticated id
Add a DisplayName service interface to be called from C code.
During connection establishment use the translated
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/106#discussion_r81838905
--- Diff: include/qpid/dispatch/server.h ---
@@ -418,6 +418,22 @@ typedef struct qd_server_config_t {
uint32_t max_frame_size
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/106#discussion_r81838943
--- Diff: include/qpid/dispatch/server.h ---
@@ -418,6 +418,22 @@ typedef struct qd_server_config_t {
uint32_t max_frame_size
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/106
DISPATCH-451: Configurable settings for session capacity and max sessions
This patch allows listener and connector settings for session capacity and
for max sessions.
It does _not_
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/155
Remove unreachable code.
Early in this function the field is limited to indicate something in the
Properties section.
`assert(QD_FIELD_MESSAGE_ID <= field &
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/159
This patch adds a competing statistic for one that already exists. Going
forward it would require a completely redundant set and every statistic would
be counted twice. That's not desirable
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/175
DISPATCH-759: Move freeing message and iterator out of core thread
Some of delivery deletion requires core context and that part stays.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/171
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/173
DISPATCH-760: Message annotation handling improvements
This PR replaces existing annotation handling with a more efficient
version. It is fully compatible with 0.8.x.
It contains the same
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/177#discussion_r129308722
--- Diff: src/message.c ---
@@ -999,11 +1014,84 @@ void qd_message_set_ingress_annotation(qd_message_t
*in_msg, qd_composed_field_t
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/177#discussion_r129318215
--- Diff: src/message_private.h ---
@@ -107,11 +106,21 @@ typedef struct {
qd_parsed_field_t *ma_pf_to_override;
qd_parsed_field_t
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/177#discussion_r129306967
--- Diff: src/buffer.c ---
@@ -83,7 +85,26 @@ size_t qd_buffer_size(qd_buffer_t *buf)
void qd_buffer_insert(qd_buffer_t *buf, size_t len
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/177#discussion_r129305989
--- Diff: src/message.c ---
@@ -846,6 +853,8 @@ qd_message_t *qd_message()
}
ZERO(msg->content);
+msg->c
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/177#discussion_r129307766
--- Diff: src/message.c ---
@@ -999,11 +1014,84 @@ void qd_message_set_ingress_annotation(qd_message_t
*in_msg, qd_composed_field_t
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/177#discussion_r129306348
--- Diff: include/qpid/dispatch/message.h ---
@@ -296,6 +296,61 @@ qd_parsed_field_t *qd_message_get_trace
(qd_message_t *msg);
*/
int
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/171
DISPATCH-760: Message annotation handling improvements
This PR replaces existing annotation handling with a more efficient
version. It is fully compatible with 0.8.x.
A comparison
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/168
The straight new V2 method offers about a 35% message rate improvement over
the existing method that shipped in 0.8.x. However, the new way of doing the
original method offers a 25% improvement
Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/168
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/168
Well spotted. That's a mistake from a failed merge conflict. Will fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/168
crolke dev annotations - work in progress PR for review
**DO NOT COMMIT THIS PULL REQUEST** It is for review only.
This work adds a new annotation scheme for inter-router annotations
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/194
DISPATCH-825: Fix interlocking between message send and receive
Don't allow a buffer on the message buffer chain that might be removed.
Use a content-based pending buffer instead.
Don't
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/196
DISPATCH-807: Message handling requires flow control to limit memory
consumption
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ChugR
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/194#discussion_r138710888
--- Diff: src/message.c ---
@@ -1109,95 +1146,97 @@ qd_message_t *qd_message_receive(pn_delivery_t
*delivery
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/196
Merged through another branch
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/196
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/205
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/208
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/208
Dispatch 829 3
This adds to Ganesh's changes in PR #206
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ChugR/qpid-dispatch DISPATCH-829-3
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/205
Dispatch 829 - reference only, do not pull this code
Test setup:
* Proton master branch as of today.
* Dispatch conf:
# Router to run qpid-interop-test
router
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/211#discussion_r145424345
--- Diff: src/message_private.h ---
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ typedef struct {
bool receive_complete; // true
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/304
Dispatch 990 Use patterns for policy vhost hostnames
This adds all the code (schema, management, run time) and supporting self
tests and old style doc.
This does not add anything to doc
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/305
I ran this branch OK on two systems:
* Fedora 27, Python 2.7
* Fedora 28, Python 3.6
The F27 system is my development laptop. It has python 2.6, 2.7, 3.3, 3.4,
3.4m, 3.5
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/324
Looking at it again I think all three of these need_check_* booleans are
suspect. Don't delete just the one, get rid of them all
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/311
Dispatch 1011- Policy username substition failures; Coverity issues
## Problem statement
* The defect is described in
[DISPATCH-1011](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1011
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/309
This is great. Ship it!
An addition to consider for the future: policy supports a _policyDir_
wherein all .json files are read for policy. This could be expanded to include
.conf files
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/334
This patch fixes the c_char_p in py3 and improves interfaces with some
const additions.
The patch also repairs some incorrect handling of policy's parse tree. It
looks like there were
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/132
* This seems like a great improvement overall. It's easier to find stuff
without needing the folklore to locate it.
* The presentation of the source tree gives the project a mature look
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/251
DISPATCH-920: Selftest exposing the issue
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ChugR/qpid-dispatch crolke-DISPATCH-920
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/255#discussion_r169471170
--- Diff: doc/new-book/configuration-security.adoc ---
@@ -412,3 +414,385 @@ listener {
For more information about these attributes, see
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/262
This PR adds vhost attribute 'hostname' as the name of the entity. It
deprecates vhost attribute 'id'.
Policy code warns if 'id' is used and fails if neither 'id' nor 'hostname
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/262
Crolke 918 vhost hostname
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ChugR/qpid-dispatch crolke-918-vhost-hostname
Alternatively you
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/355
DISPATCH-1098: Adjust name of unit2 executable for python3
CMake chooses between 'python' and 'python3'.
Make a similar choice for 'unit2' and 'unit2-3'.
This lets both python2
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/340
Dispatch-1055: Router fails to propagage credit on link router after drain
cycle
In this PR the "fix" is all in transfer.c.
* The router was not accounting for transfers
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/342#discussion_r202473609
--- Diff: docs/books/user-guide/configuration-security.adoc ---
@@ -417,290 +417,367 @@ For more information about these attributes, see
xref:adding
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/342#discussion_r202473464
--- Diff: docs/books/user-guide/configuration-security.adoc ---
@@ -417,290 +417,367 @@ For more information about these attributes, see
xref:adding
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/342#discussion_r202471950
--- Diff: docs/books/user-guide/configuration-security.adoc ---
@@ -417,290 +417,367 @@ For more information about these attributes, see
xref:adding
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/262#discussion_r170987746
--- Diff: console/config/schema.json ---
@@ -1273,6 +1273,10 @@
"type": "map",
"descriptio
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/271
DISPATCH-945: Prevent crash at shutdown when websocket client connected
Execute qd_http_server_free before the server is shut down so that
lws vhost and context destruction activity
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/265
+1 Ship it
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/255#discussion_r171883800
--- Diff: doc/new-book/configuration-security.adoc ---
@@ -412,3 +414,356 @@ listener {
For more information about these attributes, see
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/261#discussion_r170614842
--- Diff: tests/system_tests_autolinks.py ---
@@ -53,17 +53,18 @@ def setUpClass(cls):
#
# Create a pair of default
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/262
Close this PR and create a new one using @ganeshmurthy deprecationName
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/262
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/255#discussion_r171881914
--- Diff: doc/new-book/configuration-security.adoc ---
@@ -412,3 +414,356 @@ listener {
For more information about these attributes, see
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/262#discussion_r171073403
--- Diff: console/config/schema.json ---
@@ -1273,6 +1273,10 @@
"type": "map",
"descriptio
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/420
If I have a network of interior routers, each with some edge routers, I can
qdstat -e each OK. But if I add -r some-other-router and the other router is on
another host them qdstat fails
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/420
The problem was router INTC was running master branch code and did not have
this PR's changes. With both routers running DISPATCH-1177-1@0e4cd the command
works ok.
This PR could
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/421
Import crolke's adverbl project
Scraper is a data scraping program. It reads qpid-dispatch router log files,
categorizes and sorts the data, and produces an HTML summary.
You can merge
GitHub user ChugR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/158
PROTON-1937: Use value.type() to check for value presence or absence
This works for me on Fedroa 27 and 28
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/384
This patch clears up the too-many-links for sheaf error and improves my
router network stability. FOr this I approve the patch.
But in tests before and after this patch my throughput
Github user ChugR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/383
+1 Ship It
Looks good and works. Failing tests could never get beyond a few hundred
messages. With this patch I'm past 100 million messages
64 matches
Mail list logo
