[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14706717#comment-14706717
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-6701:
Couple of points,
1. Assert was to verify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14705746#comment-14705746
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-6701:
QPID-6040 (rev 1620659) changed
Rajith Attapattu created QPID-6701:
--
Summary: [Regression btw 0.30 - 0.32] If address doesn't resolve
an exception is not thrown
Key: QPID-6701
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6701
/codec2/TypeRegistry.java
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30379/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
---
On Feb. 2, 2015, 6:38 p.m., rajith attapattu wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30379/
---
(Updated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30379/#review70071
---
On Jan. 28, 2015, 8:04 p.m., rajith attapattu wrote
proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/codec2/TransportTypesEncoder.java
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30379/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-5870:
---
Attachment: QPID-5870.part2.patch
I added a check to ensure that the subscription queue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14055304#comment-14055304
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-5870:
but I wonder what happens around e.g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14052509#comment-14052509
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-5868:
As for the session being closed, once
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14052508#comment-14052508
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-5868:
Apologies for not putting enough info
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14052523#comment-14052523
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-5870:
Again I apologize for not providing enough
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14052722#comment-14052722
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-5868:
I verified that both the transport session
Rajith Attapattu created QPID-5868:
--
Summary: Java client ignores exceptions when waiting on sync
Key: QPID-5868
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5868
Project: Qpid
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-5868:
---
Attachment: QPID-5868.patch
This patch suggests a potential fix for the issue.
Java client
Rajith Attapattu created QPID-5869:
--
Summary: Specifying an ACL file will cause a core dumps when
management is sisabled
Key: QPID-5869
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5869
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-5869:
---
Summary: Specifying an invalid ACL file will cause a core dumps when
management is sisabled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-5869.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Rajith Attapattu
Added a fix on trunk at r1607488
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-5870:
---
Attachment: QPID-5870.patch
The subscription queue is now deleted when the consumer is closed
Welcome Andrew!
Rajith
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Andrew MacBean andymacb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks very much!
Also the kind welcome messages are much appreciated. :)
-Andrew
On 3 Jun 2014 20:32, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
The Qpid PMC have voted to grant commit rights to
,
rajith attapattu
based tests.
No tests yet for passive mode.
Passive mode needs to be tested thoroughly.
The purpose of this review is to get agreement about the direction I have taken.
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated DISPATCH-16:
-
Attachment: patch_1_schema_change.diff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated DISPATCH-16:
-
Attachment: patch_5_remove_set_mask_method.diff
Improve logging for dispatch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-5491:
---
Attachment: (was: log_patch.2)
Improve logging for dispatch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-5491:
---
Attachment: log_patch.3
Reworked the patch to work on top of Ted's changes.
Improve logging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-5491:
---
Attachment: log_patch.2
The patch contains the following changes.
1. Each module registers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13874837#comment-13874837
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-5491:
Sample configuration.
logging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13874837#comment-13874837
]
Rajith Attapattu edited comment on QPID-5491 at 1/17/14 2:52 PM
/log_private.h 1559165
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17050/diff/
Testing
---
All existing tests pass.
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
Yes the older versions (pre 0-10) only works with Binding URL format.
Rajith
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/07/2013 05:51 PM, k.madnani84 wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use Qpid Java client 0.24 with RabbitMQ 3.1.5.I am getting
a
null pointer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13785382#comment-13785382
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-5204:
QPID-3838 prefixes vendor specific
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14361/#review26555
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- rajith attapattu
On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:04 p.m
On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:29 p.m., rajith attapattu wrote:
Ship It!
QpidQueueOptions.java is no longer in use.
Provided the QMF changes are verified by Fraser I don't foresee any other
issues.
- rajith
---
This is an automatically
Hey Philip,
Thanks for the analysis!
I've been closely following your work. JCarder seems like a very useful
tool.
Given that we use multiple locks, there are many ways to get into deadlock
situations which has made the current client untenable in some user
environments.
I will definitely use
Congrats and Welcome Pavel!
Rajith
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
The Qpid PMC have voted to grant commit rights to Pavel Moravec in
recognition of his long standing contributions to the project.
Welcome Pavel, and thank you for your continued support
For python, this is indeed the solution we used when a user wanted the Java
client to recognize a python string sent in a map or an application
property.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 01:15 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at
Sorry, there wasn't JIRA for this.
I should have created one.
The patch I mentioned was attached to an internal Bugzilla .
Rajith
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.comwrote:
This also seems like a change which should have a JIRA reference,
particularly if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-3838.
Resolution: Fixed
A fix has been made on trunk and also ported to 0.24
[X] Yes, replace the existing site with the proposed site
Rajith
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Justin Ross jr...@apache.org
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 1:35:14 PM
Subject: [VOTE]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4922:
---
Attachment: QPID-4922.patch
Marks that close has been called and then executes it after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4922:
---
Attachment: (was: QPID-4922.patch)
If Consumer close() method is invoked while
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4922:
---
Attachment: QPID-4922.patch
If Consumer close() method is invoked while inside onMessage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4357:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21)
Future
If an exception is received
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13681283#comment-13681283
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4574:
Currently the following solution is being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4574:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21)
Future
[JMS] Deadlock involving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-4608.
Resolution: Fixed
The relevant commits are
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu closed QPID-3769.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to both trunk and 0.22 branch.
NPE in client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-4540.
Resolution: Fixed
A fix was committed at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1434492view=rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-4497.
Resolution: Fixed
[Java client] Exclusive property for the subscription queue cannot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4906:
---
Attachment: QPID-4906.patch
If close() or closed() is called while the dispatcher thread
for a
now-closed consumer?
Does any particular attention need paid to the overridden 0-10 specific
version of this method?
rajith attapattu wrote:
The message will be dropped if a consumer (or session is closed or
closing).
When a consumer is closed, any messages acquired
I'm strongly against using dependencies for the JMS client unless it's
unavoidable.
We can make exception for slf4j, but even then my preference is to use JDK
logging.
We've had several issues dealing with dependencies in the past.
Increasingly our client is being used in various containers like
Rajith Attapattu created QPID-4906:
--
Summary: If Session close() or closed() method is invoked while
inside onMessage(), they should be excuted after onMessage() has completed.
Key: QPID-4906
URL: https
Yes [X]
No [ ]
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.comwrote:
Following recent discussions regarding a more component-focused structure,
and beginning work on a Proton-based AMQP 1.0 JMS client, could everyone
please vote on the following:
Create a QPIDJMS
QPID:
Yes [x ]
No [ ]
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
As some of you will already know, a mail was sent to committers@a.oearlier
outlining some of the newer services ASF infra offer that we may not know
about. One in particular stuck
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Rob Godfrey Sort of. In general,
for release content, there's a special
generation step. That's really a per-release task, however, not
something that many developers would
+1 for a different JIRA system.
I believe that is the only way we can support an independent release cycle.
Rajith
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.comwrote:
On 23 May 2013 20:24, Justin Ross jr...@apache.org wrote:
This is great news!
On Thu, May 23,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-4873.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed the patch from Helen with modifications to accommodate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13664379#comment-13664379
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4873:
I'm happy with optimization #2 and #3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13664487#comment-13664487
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4873:
+1 Seems a good solution!
Rajith
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13664819#comment-13664819
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4873:
Hi Helen,
I will take care of it first
suite, tests from customers and QE around the deadlock situation.
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
for a
now-closed consumer?
Does any particular attention need paid to the overridden 0-10 specific
version of this method?
rajith attapattu wrote:
The message will be dropped if a consumer (or session is closed or
closing).
When a consumer is closed, any messages acquired
for a
now-closed consumer?
Does any particular attention need paid to the overridden 0-10 specific
version of this method?
rajith attapattu wrote:
The message will be dropped if a consumer (or session is closed or
closing).
When a consumer is closed, any messages acquired
Rajith Attapattu created QPID-4864:
--
Summary: The JMS client shouldn't hold a lock when creating a
messge
Key: QPID-4864
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4864
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-4864.
Resolution: Fixed
Removed the lock. Fix committed at http://svn.apache.org/r1483877
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4849:
---
Labels: JMS SSL, (was: )
Faulty parsing logic in retrieving CN from an SSL certificate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4849:
---
Labels: JMS SSL (was: JMS SSL,)
Faulty parsing logic in retrieving CN from an SSL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-4849.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed a fix at http://svn.apache.org/r1483079
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4574:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: {code}
diff --git
a/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-4574:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: The change here is that the failoverMutex is acquired before
/BasicMessageConsumer_0_10.java
1480271
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10738/diff/
Testing
---
Java test suite, tests from customers and QE around the deadlock situation.
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
., rajith attapattu wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10738/
---
(Updated May 8, 2013, 2:02 p.m.)
Review request
exceptions, or eat the interrupted
status.
rajith attapattu wrote:
For starters I will narrow it down to interrupted exception and then log
it.
I meant catch the interrupted exception only and ignore.
Even if the thread was woken up prematurely, it will go back to waiting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13652992#comment-13652992
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-3838:
I have committed the fix described
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-3317:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.20
JMS client doesn't distinguish between node and link bindings
If we use the following address with the java client you get an error with
exchange bind.
myEx_headers;{create: always,node:{type: topic,x-declare:{type:headers}}}
However the exchange (or queue) is created, all though the bind fails.
When this happens,
1. Should we reverse the queue or
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/09/2013 04:40 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
If we use the following address with the java client you get an error with
exchange bind.
myEx_headers;{create: always,node:{type: topic,x-declare:{type:headers
and QE around the deadlock situation.
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13645788#comment-13645788
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4714:
Applied patch to the 0.22 branch.
See http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-4714.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Future)
0.22
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13641879#comment-13641879
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4714:
I have checked in a fix at http
I would like to include r1475810 http://svn.apache.org/r1475810 in 0.22
The corresponding JIRA (patch attached) is QPID-4714
Rajith
.
The bottom line is this issue needs to be resolved, or else people will
loose confidence in our client.
rajith attapattu wrote:
It seems you have already noticed that there would be issues with the
consumer close, since it would no longer stop deliveries occurring while
closing was in progress
/ClientProperties.java
1471133
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10738/diff/
Testing
---
Java test suite, tests from customers and QE around the deadlock situation.
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10738/#review19626
---
On April 24, 2013, 12:19 p.m., rajith attapattu wrote
:19 p.m., rajith attapattu wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10738/
---
(Updated April 24, 2013, 12:19 p.m
to
the
client was 3 weeks ago:
http://svn.apache.org/r1463158
It isn't actually running at all on the Java broker profiles:
java/test-profiles/JavaExcludes:org.apache.qpid.client.SessionCreateTest#*
Robbie
On 22 April 2013 20:30, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10738/diff/
Testing
---
Java test suite, tests from customers and QE around the deadlock situation.
Thanks,
rajith attapattu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13639735#comment-13639735
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4714:
If we move the close connection method
Hi Folks,
org.apache.qpid.client.SessionCreateTest hangs when I run its under the cpp
profile.
It works well under the java broker profile.
It seems the last successful run on Jenkins was 2 days ago
https://builds.apache.org/job/Qpid-Java-Cpp-Test/
Anybody else seeing this ?
Regards,
Rajith
/JavaExcludes:org.apache.qpid.client.SessionCreateTest#*
Robbie
On 22 April 2013 20:30, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
org.apache.qpid.client.SessionCreateTest hangs when I run its under the
cpp
profile.
It works well under the java broker profile.
It seems
+1 on this.
Having the flexibility to have individual release cycles for each component
will be huge advantage for us.
However as Justin mentioned, we shouldn't rule out a Qpid wide release
perhaps once a year or so.
From a users perspective this is a great thing to have, bcos all the
components
Rajith Attapattu created QPID-4714:
--
Summary: AMQConnection close is leaking socket connections
Key: QPID-4714
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4714
Project: Qpid
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13618814#comment-13618814
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-3769:
Adjusted the hashcode and equals impl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-3769:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.22
NPE in client AMQDestination.equals
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13618955#comment-13618955
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-3769:
Ported the relevant changes to 0.22 branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13615424#comment-13615424
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-3769:
I was going to request a port, but I
Hey Justin,
I want to include the following commits into the 0.22 branch.
http://svn.apache.org/r1461324
http://svn.apache.org/r1461329
Once I make some adjustments to the tests, I would need to port that as well.
I will send a follow up email when I've got that sorted out.
Regards,
Rajith
1 - 100 of 1348 matches
Mail list logo
