RE: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-03-07 Thread Steve Huston
-Original Message- From: Andrew Stitcher [mailto:astitc...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 2:45 PM To: dev@qpid.apache.org Subject: RE: 0.10 release update - feature integration week On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 18:04 -0500, Steve Huston wrote: Hi, Steve. End

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-19 Thread Ken Giusti
Fyi - attached a short doc describing the user interface for this feature. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2935 Feedback enthusiastically welcomed. -K - Original Message - I've just merged the QPID-2935 branch into trunk. I'll update the JIRA shortly, and attach some

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-18 Thread Gordon Sim
On 02/14/2011 05:19 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 02/14/2011 03:08 PM, Justin Ross wrote: Hi, folks. Our schedule (appended below) calls for all major features to be functionally complete and on trunk by the 16th, this Wednesday. This means we are rapidly approaching the point where we make

RE: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-17 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 18:04 -0500, Steve Huston wrote: Hi, Steve. End of the week is certainly okay. Ok, thanks. I see that change introduces some (warning, speaking from some naivete here) big changes to broker config. If that's the case, I'd like it to get a shot at some

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-17 Thread Ken Giusti
10^6 apologies for not weighing in sooner... Regarding qpid-2935: Currently, standalone broker flow control is 'code complete' - it is passing a set of new unit tests I've added. I've run into some problems replicating state when using flow control in a clustered broker. Alan's is helping

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-17 Thread Justin Ross
Hi, Ken. I think the compromise you've struck with clustering is sensible for the 0.10 release. If the work to make flow control work with clustering is minor, we may be able to include it as a bug fix in 0.10. If, otoh, the work required is more extensive, we can address it in 0.12.

RE: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-17 Thread Steve Huston
update - feature integration week On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 18:04 -0500, Steve Huston wrote: Hi, Steve. End of the week is certainly okay. Ok, thanks. I see that change introduces some (warning, speaking from some naivete here) big changes to broker config. If that's the case

RE: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-17 Thread Steve Huston
-Original Message- From: Andrew Stitcher [mailto:astitc...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 2:45 PM To: dev@qpid.apache.org Subject: RE: 0.10 release update - feature integration week On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 18:04 -0500, Steve Huston wrote: Hi, Steve. End of the week

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-16 Thread Paul Colby
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, folks.  Our schedule (appended below) calls for all major features to be functionally complete and on trunk by the 16th, this Wednesday. I'd love to be able to get my PHP binding into the next release... but its not quite

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-16 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 02/16/2011 04:10 PM, Paul Colby wrote: As it is, I expect it to be complete sometime next week (though I'm not sure how much is involved in implementing automake support (?). go for it, let's try get it in. BTW, what happened to a 0.9 release? Are odd point releases being used for

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-16 Thread Justin Ross
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Paul Colby wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, folks.  Our schedule (appended below) calls for all major features to be functionally complete and on trunk by the 16th, this Wednesday. I'd love to be able to get my PHP binding

RE: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-16 Thread Justin Ross
Hi, Steve. End of the week is certainly okay. I see that change introduces some (warning, speaking from some naivete here) big changes to broker config. If that's the case, I'd like it to get a shot at some extra review. Justin On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Steve Huston wrote: Hi Justin, I'm

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-14 Thread Gordon Sim
On 02/14/2011 03:08 PM, Justin Ross wrote: Hi, folks. Our schedule (appended below) calls for all major features to be functionally complete and on trunk by the 16th, this Wednesday. This means we are rapidly approaching the point where we make choices. If something won't be ready in time, we

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-14 Thread Justin Ross
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Gordon Sim wrote: On 02/14/2011 03:08 PM, Justin Ross wrote: Hi, folks. Our schedule (appended below) calls for all major features to be functionally complete and on trunk by the 16th, this Wednesday. This means we are rapidly approaching the point where we make choices.

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-14 Thread Andrew Kennedy
On 14 Feb 2011, at 17:19, Gordon Sim wrote: On 02/14/2011 03:08 PM, Justin Ross wrote: Hi, folks. Our schedule (appended below) calls for all major features to be functionally complete and on trunk by the 16th, this Wednesday. This means we are rapidly approaching the point where we make

Re: 0.10 release update - feature integration week

2011-02-14 Thread Justin Ross
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Andrew Kennedy wrote: On 14 Feb 2011, at 17:19, Gordon Sim wrote: On 02/14/2011 03:08 PM, Justin Ross wrote: Hi, folks. Our schedule (appended below) calls for all major features to be functionally complete and on trunk by the 16th, this Wednesday. This means we are