I have multiple PLT trees on my machine, and right now the one in
/Users/cce/git/racket/generics seems to want to use the Scribble search
page from the one in /Users/cce/git/racket/plt. Except, once this problem
came up, I deleted both of them, and rebuilt the one in generics from
scratch. It sti
Thanks, Ryan. And thanks for the earlier reminder for me to test the
pre-release; I was distracted with other work, and probably would've
missed this pre-release.
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
It's not there, but it should be. I'll add it.
Ryan
On 07/24/2013 09:26 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Did a PostgreSQL SSL performance fix get into 5.3.6 pre-release in some
form?
In the pre-release I just downloaded, I don't see Ryan's original fix to
"collects/db/private/postgresql/connection.rk
Those 3 commits (the fixes for TR tests) are already in the release
branch and will be in the next release candidate build.
Ryan
On 07/24/2013 10:55 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
If we just take the latter 3 commits that Vincent mentioned, it should
fix the (serial) tests. Those are just TR
Ok, great!
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I think those are already planned to be taken. So lets see if the tests pass
> in the next build.
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>>
>> If we just take the latter 3 commits that Vinc
I think those are already planned to be taken. So lets see if the tests
pass in the next build.
Robby
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> If we just take the latter 3 commits that Vincent mentioned, it should
> fix the (serial) tests. Those are just TR test fixes, and
If we just take the latter 3 commits that Vincent mentioned, it should
fix the (serial) tests. Those are just TR test fixes, and can't break
anything else.
Sam
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I don't think we should take that commit. Is it possible to get a version of
>
I don't think we should take that commit. Is it possible to get a version
of the TR tests that either don't run in parallel or run without passing
keywords across place channels?
Robby
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> I will say that I'm not 100% happy with just as
I will say that I'm not 100% happy with just assuming that TR works in
the absence of a clean test run. Is there a reason not to include
these fixes?
Sam
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Vincent St-Amour
> wrote:
>
Did a PostgreSQL SSL performance fix get into 5.3.6 pre-release in some
form?
In the pre-release I just downloaded, I don't see Ryan's original fix to
"collects/db/private/postgresql/connection.rkt".
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
> * Greg Cooper
> - FrTime Tests
>
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Thanks.
Robby
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> The problems I've observed were only with the tests.
>
> The first problem I reported was caused by a bug/limitation in places,
> which was fixed by 733907474190da499a1782b230086170c5b87643. It was
> preventing the TR test
The problems I've observed were only with the tests.
The first problem I reported was caused by a bug/limitation in places,
which was fixed by 733907474190da499a1782b230086170c5b87643. It was
preventing the TR test suite from running properly.
The others were bugs in the TR tests, not in TR itsel
Vincent: can you clarify what the status of TR & the release is, please?
Are there problems only with tests, or were there problems elsewhere too?
Thanks,
Robby
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> The TR tests still fail when using a single place.
>
> The following commit
Thanks for those pointers, Tobias, I'll get those fixed.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> I really like the new set features, especially mutable sets and lists as
> sets.
>
> Two things i have notices:
> * The docs for set-intersect seem a bit mixed up with
I really like the new set features, especially mutable sets and lists as
sets.
Two things i have notices:
* The docs for set-intersect seem a bit mixed up with set-union stuff
* I could not get set-intersect on lists working, what i've tried
-> (set-intersect '(1 2 3) '(2 3 4))
; set-add: cont
*** Action Item: sign up for RacketCon http://bit.ly/racketconsignup2013 ***
RacketCon 2013 will be taking place at Northeastern University on
September 29. Please sign up at the link above if you plan on attending.
If you are interested in giving a 10 minute talk on something you've
built in
17 matches
Mail list logo
