Re: [racket-dev] Native graphics libraries upgraded for Windows and Mac OS X (was Re: Windows GTK version conflicts with GObjectIntrospection)

2014-04-11 Thread Neil Toronto
No need to apologize! Anyway, the previously missing polygon is there in Northwestern's snapshot's docs now. Neil ⊥ On 04/10/2014 11:09 AM, Robby Findler wrote: The Northwestern snapshot broke, sorry about that. (The script's call to git submodule update doesn't work for some reason; I've run

Re: [racket-dev] ECDHE patch for Racket's OpenSSL bindings.

2014-04-11 Thread Edward Lee
Thanks for catching the typo. I don't have a good answer to your second question; I really don't know if they should. --Edward On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:54:36PM -0400, Stephen Chang wrote: Ok thanks. Sorry, I think one more is missing from curve/c (sect283r1)? Another question: Should

Re: [racket-dev] ECDHE patch for Racket's OpenSSL bindings.

2014-04-11 Thread Ryan Culpepper
IIRC, most of the code in openssl/mzssl.rkt predates ffi/unsafe/alloc. So yes, BIO_new etc should use (allocator _) etc, and that would simplify some of the code that currently uses the local with-failure macro to do deallocation. But no need to fix that in this patch. Some comments on the

Re: [racket-dev] ECDHE patch for Racket's OpenSSL bindings.

2014-04-11 Thread Edward Lee
Thanks. I will not have time until Monday; if you can wait until then, I will have an updated patch then. --Edward On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:44:17PM -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote: IIRC, most of the code in openssl/mzssl.rkt predates ffi/unsafe/alloc. So yes, BIO_new etc should use (allocator