Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this?
Robby
On Friday, July 18, 2014, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering what people think about a potential API addition to the
> `syntax/flatten-begin` library.
>
> Something like `flatten-begin*` (or a less terrible name) that would
> rec
Hi all,
I was wondering what people think about a potential API addition to the
`syntax/flatten-begin` library.
Something like `flatten-begin*` (or a less terrible name) that would
recursively flatten `begin` expressions like the `flatten` function does
for plain lists.
i.e.,
(flatten-begin* #
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Checklist items for the v6.1 release
> (using the v6.0.900.900 release candidate build)
>
> Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
> item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
> c
Checklist items for the v6.1 release
(using the v6.0.900.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes ar
Ah, now I know what I was doing wrong. I was using identifier-binding for
references, but not for definitions. Now that I'm using it in both places,
things seem to work.
Thanks!
Sam
On Jul 17, 2014 3:08 AM, "Matthew Flatt" wrote:
> Does `identifier-binding` not give you the symbol that you need?
Does `identifier-binding` not give you the symbol that you need?
At Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:32:46 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Ok, I thought I had figured this out, but I was wrong.
>
> Here's what I want to be able to do:
>
> - take an identifier in a fully-expanded source file
> - transla
6 matches
Mail list logo
