Thanks, that worked.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Kazuhiro HISHINUMA wrote:
> Me too. I think your browser maybe blocks SSL certificate of
> https://pkg.racket-lang.org/.
> Try to access https://pkg.racket-lang.org/ and approve its certificate.
>
>
>
I've put in my email and password, but clicking "Log In" does nothing.
Neither does pressing enter. Anyone else seeing this behavior, or know
what the problem is?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Carl Eastlund
> - Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
>
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
by which I
justified set-add and set-add! In one interface.
And if we separate them, we need one interface with just queries, then four
more for add, remove, add!, and remove!, at the very least. It's a messy
direction to go in.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
O
Perhaps some macro hackery on the defmodule form to make it into
defmodule-if-exists and only document that the module is typed if it is
actually installed?
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-09-16 16:17:33 -0400, as...@racket-lang.org wr
Argh, sorry, I read the docs for the wrong one, sorry for the misleading
response.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Sep 9, 2013 12:16 PM, "J. Ian Johnson" wrote:
> I changed it to (call-with-limits (* 30 60) 2048 (lambda ()
> )) for a sanit
Does have the form (lambda () )?
Because if not, that's the problem.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Sep 9, 2013 11:55 AM, "J. Ian Johnson" wrote:
> I'm running my analysis benchmarks in the context of (with-limits (* 30
> 60)
te them. I don't think calling them
#:when or #:unless makes sense outside the for clauses.
> >> > Carl Eastlund
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Stephen Chang
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> &g
yntax-rule (for/print/fixed clauses pre .. result)
(for clauses
pre ...
(printf "~v\n" (let () result
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> #lang racket/base
> (require (for-syntax racket/base
>
ase result is (begin defn expr), but that's still simpler than
using split-for-body.
My question is -- have I overlooked some clever subtlety here that makes
split-for-body necessary, or is it usually easier to just decompose pre ...
result rather than bothering
Right, that's the issue with needing the (let () result) in my
define-syntax-rule version. I still didn't need split-for-body, which
doesn't guarantee there are no definitions in the post ... part. All it
guarantees to eliminate are #:final and #:break.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Se
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > They have to be separate internal definition contexts in order for
> #:break
> > and #:final to be able to stop execution before the definitions
> themselves
>
ns
over for loops need to use split-for-body.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Sorry that I forgot to add the `let` while turning the code you sent
> into a full example. Here's another try.
>
> #lang racket/base
> (require (for
They have to be separate internal definition contexts in order for #:break
and #:final to be able to stop execution before the definitions themselves
get run.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> > "Among the bodys, besides stopping the iteration and
,
obviously.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:58 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> Weird you can't repro.
> I only use hasheq when I know the keys are symbols, or the table is local
> and only used for a graph traversal (where the graph is not changing during
> traversal).
> -
You'd have to ask Ryan to be sure, but I think they're pretty stable. I've
been using them for some time.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Ah, thanks. That's exactly what I wanted.
>
> How stable are these features? Shall I
identifier, you just get X.
So now you just have X bound in both clauses, and that's automatically made
an attribute of AorB, and it all works like you want.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Is there a way for a syntax-class to automatically
eaningful
results. But that restriction is documented and predates my changes, so
I'm leaving it in unless someone wants to propose a better way. That means
rejecting all other kinds of sets beyond hash sets and lists for union,
intersection, etc.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:27
e
notion of equality is. So currently, I just reject all of them.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I find this an unsatisfying consequence of the implementation and not
> necessary. For instance, you could implement set-union purely
> generically a
way, right now, generic sets are designed
so you can use any one representation, but they don't combine
representations.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> No, it doesn't seem to be using the fallback in this case.
>
> ianj@sampson:~/racke
perhaps I should. It's
a weird name, since "hash-set" and "hash-set!" are already existing,
unrelated functions.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:08 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> Okay, I can abide. However, that doesn't really get at my frustration. I'm
&
Ian, sets are now a generic datatype, like dictionaries. Association lists
are dictionaries, and lists are now sets. They're also streams and
sequences. They're not just "set-like".
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:56 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> I just wasted
Mind you, I don't think this example -- using a method in a #:fast-defaults
predicate -- can work. The implementation of free-box will have to check
the predicate in order to perform generic dispatch, and the predicate has
to call free-box, so it will diverge.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, A
ree.
After that, you get the error "free-box: undefined" because the
#:fast-defaults predicate is lifted to a definition that comes before the
definition of the free-box method. I'll fix that by reordering the
definitions; meanwhile you can fix that by just eta-expanding your use of
The method names are always going to be in the context of the generic
interface name. There's nowhere else they can come from.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:39 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> WRT the struct abstraction, using syntax-local-introduce on
> #'gen:binds-var
Okay, let me dig into this. The expansion of define/generic is an odd
thing in the way it treats the method names; I'm not at all sure I've
gotten it right, or that it's clear what "right" should even be. I'll get
back to you shortly.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, A
efine/generic if it's not
working.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> I'm starting to use generics, and me being myself, I wrote some macros to
> make writing method definitions easier.
> But, I'm seeing that #:methods seems to rebin
pported method, allows the documentation
to imply all the direct dependencies of set->stream on things that need to
be implemented methods, without having to restate them all.
For the implementation, what we have would fit the docs, and it might also
be possible to slightly improve the error m
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> > With that in mind, I think it would make sense to move `set-first' and
> > `set-empty?' to the primitive set (making it clear that they are
> > optional, and can be derived from `set->stream' if need be). With those
> > two in the primitive
-rest, it should be derivable.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> > Would it be better to just remove the "primitve" / "derived" distinction,
> > since it's somewhat artificial, and leave it up to the individual method
&g
down to primitive methods (in some sense) if all else failed.
Would it be better to just remove the "primitve" / "derived" distinction,
since it's somewhat artificial, and leave it up to the individual method
descriptions? Is there some better way I should be describin
others
you needed to implement, or if I just forgot to think that whole thing
through.
Do you have examples of which ones don't come "for free" with the primitive
methods?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Just played a bit with gen:set.
d you only
need to do it once. Hopefully I misunderstood git-subtree, but if I
didn't, I found its interface disappointing.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-07-27 07:10:54 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > I'm still unsure that su
Yes, instead you want to run 'make' at the top of the repository.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Jul 29, 2013 12:23 PM, "J. Ian Johnson" wrote:
> I've done a complete nuke of my local racket install, and many things have
>
I currently use PLTADDONDIR to make each repo's packages install to a
different place, within the repo tree, so that they're both separate, and
get cleaned up if and when I remove the repo. Will that still work with
these changes?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mat
After some fixes, mostly to contracts and documentation, I've pushed the
new generics and set features to the master branch.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> My work on adding gen:set, and related changes to define-generics and
> gen:dict, i
That fixed it, thanks Matthew!
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> When you visit the main user-specific documentation page, then a cookie
> is installed to remember that page as your user-specific page (which
> would include user-scoped packa
still wants to use the search page from the other, now
nonexistent, tree. Anyone know what might be going wrong? I'm going
insane here trying to figure out what lingering reference there might be to
the now-removed tree.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
Thanks for those pointers, Tobias, I'll get those fixed.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> I really like the new set features, especially mutable sets and lists as
> sets.
>
> Two things i have notices:
> * The docs for set-intersect seem
My work on adding gen:set, and related changes to define-generics and
gen:dict, is ready for review and (hopefully) to push to the master
branch. The branch moved in the process of cleaning things up, it's now at:
https://github.com/carl-eastlund/racket/tree/generics-from-scratch
(The
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Carl Eastlund
> - Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
>
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
every use of #%declare in the code base, and tracking down
every macro that can possibly expand into it.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> When compiling a fresh git head clone, I still get some cross-phase
> persistence errors (see below). Is this my fau
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:15:46 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> > On 07/10/2013 09:04 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm currently trying to fix the Typed Racket uni
nerics/racket/lib/collects/compiler/cm.rkt:510:0:
maybe-compile-zo
raco setup:
/Users/cce/git/racket/generics/racket/lib/collects/compiler/cm.rkt:622:2:
do-check
raco setup:
/Users/cce/git/racket/generics/racket/lib/collects/compiler/cm.rkt:703:4
raco setup:
/Users/cce/git/racket/generics/racket/lib
o setup" don't re-compile dependencies, what does?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
at the top level? Or is there a smarter way to
use them that I'm missing?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
allows define/generic and
unsupported (absent) methods
- there is now a #:fallbacks option for define-generics
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
t;books",
and I wrote a dissertation to try to solve it. I hope we're not repeating
their mistake, but it seems like we have yet another flat namespace with no
resolution mechanism.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Could you simply forge the source location on the syntax object to make it
look like it's from a collection?
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I looked into this too and didn't come up with a good solution.
>
> It would be nice if there were
m the default distribution, and (b) re-enable compilation for
them. That way the dependencies will be computed properly. It also
suggests that if they aren't already included, perhaps we should add planet
packages to the list of things we consider among dependencies?
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul
That all sounds like exactly what I had in mind, with different (pretty
much better) terminology.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> The package system has a notion of "auto" packages, which are packages
> that were automatically inst
be to implement this, but I think it would
make the package system much more usable to present 90% of the interactions
solely in terms of the top-level packages the user cares about, and do all
the cleanup of dependency packages silently in the background when possible.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
What does being "so fundamental" have to do with being in the core vs being
in a package? We should not confuse putting things in packages with making
them second-class concepts. We can put racket/sandbox in a package without
necessarily making it any less fundamental to Racket.
Car
module path:
#
path:
/Users/cce/git/racket/plt/build/native-pkgs/gui-x86_64-macosx/racket/string.rkt
system error: No such file or directory; errno=2
Anyone know what's up?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I ran 'make', after rebasing, and eventually got this error:
pkg: missing dependencies
for package: pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib
missing packages:
gui-x86_64-macosx
Anyone know what might have gone wrong?
--Carl
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > git rebase -s recursive -X rename-threshold=50% mflatt/pkg2
>
> From a brief reading, I think that you're much better off with
> "-X subt
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote:
> According to the docs, hash->list returns a list in an unspecified order.
> Can anyone tell me a little about how hash->list might return two
> different orders give the same hash table? Possibly across different
> invocations of Racket?
>
>
t
cycle and should be recorded like any other change.
Anyway, if any of you out there are having trouble rebasing onto Matthew's
packages branch, try the commands above.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Here's the latest (in a "pkg2"
work. This is still a work in progress, it will be a while before it's
ready for final review and push.
https://github.com/carl-eastlund/racket/tree/generic-sets
For sets, the main purpose has been to add gen:set and allow the set
datatype to be extended. Along with that, I've added m
e system! It wouldn't be worth all this nitpicking if it weren't
a great system; we've come a long way from distributing source code via
".plt" files, to having something worth using to bundle up our core
software.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Jay McCarthy wrot
I vote for this change. I'll happily update my package in order to make it
easier for others to contribute new ones.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think more people need to speak up on this question --- particularly
> authors of existi
path
names based on PLTCOMPILEDROOTS and similar settings. Thanks to Matthew
for reviewing the diff.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> It looks like get-module-code from syntax/modcode does what I want
> internally. I've submitted a pull requ
It does run 'raco setup', it just doesn't have much to do in response to a
failure, at least right now.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Also, Jay: can you explain more why 'raco setup' isn't something that we
> should
anges --
turning let into define and so forth. That makes this a fairly big change,
line-by-line; sorry about that, I know it makes reading the diff tougher,
but it made it easier to figure out what I was working with in the file.
Carl Eastlund
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Carl Eastlund wro
le name the same way as compilation does, except instead of
_rkt.zo I want to create _rkt.lisp or some such. Is _this_
functionality available somewhere?
I think that's all I would need to get started. Any help would be
appreciated, thanks.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Good point. Might be an argument for a
procedure-closure-contents-hash-code function. Of course, never mind that
if you can forego memoization entirely.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:39:57 -0400,
> Carl Eastlund wrote:
&g
Also if you're going to memoize things, why are you using assoc rather than
a hash table? Or if at all possible, a weak hash table?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Can't we do better than a memo table?
>
>
> On Thursday, June 6, 2013
ted name in the
same module and have them be immediately unique via free-identifier=?, as
the binding would not have taken effect yet, so to speak. This is one of
those cases where my life would be so much easier if I could relax any one
of the constraints I'm working under.
Carl Eastlund
On
n identifiers for this purpose. So unless someone has a
breakthrough and can solve this problem purely using identifiers, I'll look
to other kinds of solutions for now.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> I'm having trouble creating identif
I want a non-probabilistic guarantee of uniqueness, partly because I'd
rather not rely on something nondeterministic, and partly because in an
ideal solution, I'd like to have control over the printed names of these
identifiers.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Eric Do
7;fresh "~v != ~v\n" original identical))
(when (free-identifier=? original different)
(error 'fresh "~v == ~v\n" original different)))
--
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/23/2013 01:57 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Some modules have macros which expand into identifiers that
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 01:57 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
>
>> Some modules have macros which expand into identifiers that are not
>> exported, as they want to protect those bindings. TR currently has the
>> following code which allows it to generate an i
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>
> >> 2. Is it possible that we could solve the problem via a
> bootstrapping-only violation of our policy that you can add types to Racket
> w/o modifying existing modules?
>
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Just now, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >
> > A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > >
> > > It doesn't seem wrong to me. It&#
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >
> > 9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > > I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naiv
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naive use of "git
> > filter-branch" might not retain the history, it should be entirely
> > possible to do something a l
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:41 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > That's true, but the downside of changing the structure and having
> > files and directories move post structure change will completely
> > destroy the relevant edit history of the
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <
i...@juanfra.info> wrote:
> On 05/20/13 23:24, Carl Eastlund wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-05-20 14:42:15 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-05-20 14:42:15 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Eventually, when the dust settles, I think we'll want to convert every
> > directory to its own git repo, and then we can incorporate the
> > individual repos as git submodules.
>
> One
where the rename comes from.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm confused about an aspect of set! and rename transformers. I'll
> explain with this example:
>
> #lang racket
>
> ;; a macro that uses `synt
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote
> * Carl Eastlund
> - Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
>
Done.
--Carl
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
bining the two arity-includes? functions, I wasn't sure whether
the extra overloading would make things clearer or more confused. I can
see doing it either way.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> OK, that's a valid use case -- but isn't
x27;t see any reason to close this stuff off, when it's the one useful,
non-opaque aspect of procedure values.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Is there a real need to make this whole thing a public interface? I'd
> think that a general dire
, and that doesn't make a lot of sense. Presumably
these should be restricted to cross-expr as well.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> These seem great. I'd like to build a macro that defines cross-phase
> persistent structures, so that I can mak
se
persistent modules, but their existence makes this feature more desirable
than it has been previously.
Thanks to anyone [especially if your name is Matthew Flatt] who can give
this all a look!
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
roving the situation.
Second, for a name, how about some variation of "phase-global" or
"cross-phase"?
An amusing but probably not too informative name: "one-phase-fits-all". ;)
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Norman Gray wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
I maintain that I went to the right website, you just didn't know it yet.
;-)
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Yes, someone else reported that when they go to a different website
> than the PNR they don't get to the PNR. I have it on
kages. We should make the http:// version
automatically redirect to the https:// version. The current behavior is
very confusing.
Sorry for any redundancy if this is already on a todo list for the release
somewhere.
Carl Eastlund
P.S. Sorry for any redundancy if this is already on a todo li
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Carl Eastlund
> - Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
>
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
.
For reference, I always have the following environment variables set:
PLTHOME = root of whichever PLT tree I am using
PLTADDONDIR = $PLTHOME/add-on
PLTPLANETDIR=$PLTHOME/add-on/planet
PLTCOMPILEDROOTS=$PLTHOME/zos/v@(version):
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
It doesn't need to be phrased as a comparison to Planet1, but it can be
given as a reassurance that this "package system" thingy does not add any
baggage to require lines.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I agree in that context that it i
et. Clarifying
that Planet2 simplifies the require lines, and makes user packages on a
peer level with built-in collections, is a useful thing to put early on in
the Planet2 docs.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The documentation already says "A pac
o files for its arguments,
if it doesn't already exist.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
. They're very simple names for very, very
common operations. I use them all the time, and it makes me write
different code in racket/base than in racket when I can't get them. I
would like to either always have them, or be convinced of why I should
never have them.
Carl Eastlund
On
If they do the wrong thing, we should fix them, not deprecate them. We're
not LISP, let's not promote car/cdr as the primary names for list
operations.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> -1, since they are different from what some people woul
Throw cons? in with empty?, please.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2012-12-13 12:44:38 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> > Does this sound reasonable?
>
> +1. While we're at it, might as well also put at least `empty` and
>
e do eventually want a default system that
package developers can use without too much mucking about with
"experimental" versioning systems. But I think an initial period of
"crowd-sourcing" the design of that system will do us some good.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 a
acket-lang.org for
plt-etc.byu.edu:9003 and legacy.planet2.racket-lang.org for ...:9004, or
something like that? That would be more intuitive for anyone looking at
the URLs, and flexible in case we decide to move the hosting at a later
date.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers
ction/disjunction are
useful. We could call these things andf / orf, and/proc / or/proc, conj /
disj, or any number of other paired names that aren't already taken for
conditional special forms.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:16 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> I just made a pull r
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
