And that's why I made it do that.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are
The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages
that were automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. Also, `raco
pkg remove' supports an `--auto' flag for automatically removing auto
packages that have no non-auto packages depending on them.
So, instead of adding
That all sounds like exactly what I had in mind, with different (pretty
much better) terminology.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages
that were automatically installed to
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages
that were automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. Also, `raco
pkg remove' supports an `--auto' flag for automatically removing auto
packages
An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are
packages that were automatically installed to satisfy
dependencies. Also, `raco pkg remove' supports an
5 matches
Mail list logo