Re: [racket-dev] Package management

2013-06-30 Thread Jay McCarthy
And that's why I made it do that. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are

Re: [racket-dev] Package management

2013-06-27 Thread Matthew Flatt
The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages that were automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. Also, `raco pkg remove' supports an `--auto' flag for automatically removing auto packages that have no non-auto packages depending on them. So, instead of adding

Re: [racket-dev] Package management

2013-06-27 Thread Carl Eastlund
That all sounds like exactly what I had in mind, with different (pretty much better) terminology. Carl Eastlund On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages that were automatically installed to

Re: [racket-dev] Package management

2013-06-27 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages that were automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. Also, `raco pkg remove' supports an `--auto' flag for automatically removing auto packages

Re: [racket-dev] Package management

2013-06-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages that were automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. Also, `raco pkg remove' supports an