The release process for v5.1 will begin in about two weeks. If
you have any new features that you want in and are relatively close to
being done, now is a good time to do that.
--
Ryan Culpepper
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://li
I caught up on bug assignment from the holidays on Monday, so they were
probably assigned then. I think there were two bugs assigned to the new
contract category, so maybe the problem is in the category's configuration.
If that doesn't sound right, can you send me the PR numbers?
Ryan
On 01/
Thanks to everyone whose efforts and patience helped us switch from
Subversion to Git. There was a steep learning curve, but now that I'm
familiar with git, its flexibility has been quite handy. It has been
invaluable for collaborating with the rest of you on the PLT git
repository, with a few re
Me too! Git is great now.
Jay
2011/1/5 Carl Eastlund :
> Thanks to everyone whose efforts and patience helped us switch from
> Subversion to Git. There was a steep learning curve, but now that I'm
> familiar with git, its flexibility has been quite handy. It has been
> invaluable for collaborat
FWIW, the configuration of that category looks fine.
Three hours ago, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> I caught up on bug assignment from the holidays on Monday, so they were
> probably assigned then. I think there were two bugs assigned to the new
> contract category, so maybe the problem is in the cat
In answer to Ryan, I don't think that I've gotten any such messages in
a while and I think that these two PRs are ones where I was surprised
that I didn't get a message, because my name was already on them.
11587
11548
Robby
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> FWIW, the conf
+1
The learning curve isn't great, but the more I learn about git the
more I like it.
N.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Me too! Git is great now.
>
> Jay
>
> 2011/1/5 Carl Eastlund :
>> Thanks to everyone whose efforts and patience helped us switch from
>> Subversion to G
Do you normally get email notifications when I assign PRs to you?
My current understanding is this: If a PR's category is changed, the
responsibility is set based on the category, but no email notification
is sent. If the PR's responsibility is changed explicitly, I think a
notification is sen
Would a kind soul find some spare time to derive a bag implementation from the
set library? Thanks -- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Single and double precision floating-point numbers have different read
syntax but print the same way.
Welcome to Racket v5.0.99.6.
> 1.0e0
1.0
> (flonum? 1.0e0)
#t
> 1.0f0
1.0
> (flonum? 1.0f0)
#f
Is this a bug?
Also, it seems there's no read syntax for single-precision specials
(nan and infinit
I've been on-and-off working on a disassembler for jitted x86
functions in Racket, and it now seems to work well enough to show
other people.
You can find it at http://github.com/samth/disassemble . You'll need
`ndisasm' in your path.
To use it, try something like this:
[sa...@punge:~/sw/disasse
Oh. That probably explains it.
I do prefer to get email when I'm assigned a bug so I can respond to
it. Silently making me responsible for a bug seems like a good way for
that bug to be ignored.
Robby
On Wednesday, January 5, 2011, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Do you normally get email notifications
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 01/05/2011 05:28 PM:
I've been on-and-off working on a disassembler for jitted x86 functions in Racket,
This is great, Sam. Thank you.
Your problem now is that, while some CL-type people will like to see
assembly dumps, they will grumble about any missed optim
I didn't know that it doesn't send out emails to the responsible if it
was set by changing the category... It does sound like a problem if
it doesn't do that. I'll try to play with it.
9 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> Oh. That probably explains it.
>
> I do prefer to get email when I'm as
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 01/05/2011 05:28 PM:
>>
>> I've been on-and-off working on a disassembler for jitted x86 functions in
>> Racket,
>
> This is great, Sam. Thank you.
>
> Your problem now is that, while some CL-type people will like
Most of the time I do get email when Ryan assigns me a bug
On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> I didn't know that it doesn't send out emails to the responsible if it
> was set by changing the category... It does sound like a problem if
> it doesn't do that. I'll try to play wit
I too am quite happy we've switched. Thanks all. And Matthew, not too
long ago, showed me "git rebase -i origin" which, combined with git
commit --amend has really helped out my workflow.
So.. I have a question. I'd like to move from one machine to another
without pushing to the main repo. I know
I've just pushed a change that adds another little status indicator
thingy in the bottom of drracket. If you see a pair of parentheses
down there next to the gc icon that means that the syntax colorer's
internal state isn't up to date and it is working on bringing it back
in sync. Generally speakin
On Jan 5, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I'd like to move from one machine to another without pushing to the main
> repo. I know one way to do that is to use my own copy but it also seems like
> I should be able to just pick up
> those changes and scp 'em over to some other machine
19 matches
Mail list logo
