On Jan 15, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Casey Klein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Stevie Strickland
sstri...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I think that we are just throwing up stumbling blocks. It is really a
design choice (does a reprovide carry over
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Casey Klein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Stevie Strickland
sstri...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I think that we are just
But Casey says the _client_ broke the contract. It's irrelevant where things
come from when the client breaks the contracts.
On Jan 16, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 5:05 PM,
This sentence makes no sense to me. Contracts are all about where
things come from. How can it be irrelevant?
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
But Casey says the _client_ broke the contract. It's irrelevant where things
come from when the
4 matches
Mail list logo
