Hi all.
This time I use the github pull requesting tool, which is more
comfortable for annotation, I think.
The following merge request https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/245 contains:
* small fixes for extflonum arithmetic: two functions were not jitted.
* experimental extflonum unboxing
Thanks for the patch. I've changed more AC_TRY_RUN()s to
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE()s and AC_LINK_IFELSE()s to work better for
cross-compilation, and I'll push that soon.
Great! They all look good except one.
The test "for GNU preprocessor" never fails because whether the macro
exists or not does not
> context...:
>/Users/matthias/plt/collects/unstable/2d/private/lexer.rkt:31:2:
> 2dcond-lexer
>/Users/matthias/plt/collects/syntax-color/module-lexer.rkt:25:0:
> module-lexer
>/Users/matthias/plt/collects/scribble/private/manual-code.rkt:68:12: loop
>/Users/matthias/plt/collec
I have a scribble document that is built from two distinct locations,
which makes using the Scribble image form nearly impossible since it
takes a path relative to the build location. (My work around is
symbolic links in the file system.)
What would solve my problem is the ability to pass a m
Does define-runtime-path work? Should it?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:42 AM, David Van Horn wrote:
> I have a scribble document that is built from two distinct locations, which
> makes using the Scribble image form nearly impossible since it takes a path
> relative to the build location. (My work
I've just pushed a fix for the runtime error at the beginning there, but
I'll note that this part:
> raco setup: WARNING: undefined tag in teachpack/teachpack.scrbl:
> raco setup: (tech "worldstate")
> raco setup: (tech "s expression")
> raco setup: (tech "package")
has been on your list for m
Merged - thanks!
I'm not certain why the example below didn't work for you, but I think
it had to do with shuffling unboxed arguments to `loop'. Please check
whether the current version works; it now works for me.
There was a mismatch in the order that unboxed arguments are gathered
for the call
On 2/15/13 10:47 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Does define-runtime-path work?
Yes, for some value of "yes".
This works (specific to my context, but easy to generalize):
#lang scribble/base
@(require racket/runtime-path)
@(require (for-syntax racket/base))
@(define-runtime-module-path-index id 'boo
Does `collection-file-path' work?
Here's a small example:
#lang scribble/base
@image[(collection-file-path "heart.png" "icons")]
I think this is closer to your example (but untested):
#lang scribble/base
@(define (fig name)
(collection-file-path name "book" "figures"))
@image[#:suf
On 2/15/13 3:34 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
#lang scribble/base
@(define (fig name)
(collection-file-path name "book" "figures"))
@image[#:suffixes '(".png" ".pdf") (fig "quick-lists1")]
Excellent! Thank you, this works (I figured I was making things worse
than they had to be, but man
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
> On 2/15/13 3:34 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>>
>> #lang scribble/base
>>
>> @(define (fig name)
>> (collection-file-path name "book" "figures"))
>>
>> @image[#:suffixes '(".png" ".pdf") (fig "quick-lists1")]
>
>
> Excellent! Thank you
Hi all,
A few days ago, PR 13305 was fixed in commit
29031f0972ead0d3cd26d61f163b5e5b59e9ffce. Unfortunately, the fix makes
some identifiers in the docs display oddly in Opera. I've attached some
screenshots that demonstrate the issue.
Cheers,
Asumu
<><>_
Racket Develope
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few days ago, PR 13305 was fixed in commit
> 29031f0972ead0d3cd26d61f163b5e5b59e9ffce. Unfortunately, the fix makes
> some identifiers in the docs display oddly in Opera. I've attached some
> screenshots that demonstrate the is
13 matches
Mail list logo
