This morning build failed like this:
tools.scrbl:782:65: defproc: expected a result contract, found a string
in: "\n"
So I added a void? contract for the range.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: matth...@racket-lang.org
> Subject: [plt] Push #26418: master branch updated
> Date: March 6, 2
Thanks!
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> This morning build failed like this:
>
> tools.scrbl:782:65: defproc: expected a result contract, found a string
> in: "\n"
>
> So I added a void? contract for the range.
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: matth...@r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mikel,
On 06-03-13 04:05, mikel evins wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Eli Barzilay
> wrote:
>> But looking at it more deeply I certainly lose something -- I
>> lose the ability to use source code for development,
>
> Come again? How do
CALL FOR PAPERS
14th International Symposium
Trends in Functional Programming 2013
Brigham Young University, Utah, U.S.A.
May 14-16, 2013
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/conferences/20
On Mar 6, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Marijn wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Mikel,
>
> On 06-03-13 04:05, mikel evins wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Eli Barzilay
>> wrote:
>>> But looking at it more deeply I certainly lose something -- I
>>> lose the abili
I have the minimal things that I wanted in a working state now:
* Links to the PDF versions next to the version.
* A selection box for different versions of documents.
* A google custom search.
All of this is now visible on newdocs.racket-lang.org, but the older
versions go to the right place o
Yesterday, Michael Wilber wrote:
> The Google search box seems a bit disorienting to me. Perhaps I just
> learned Racket, say yesterday, and it's unclear what it provides
> that isn't searched by the search box in the top middle. It might be
> nice to integrate that with the results page somehow, l
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> I have the minimal things that I wanted in a working state now:
>
> * Links to the PDF versions next to the version.
>
> * A selection box for different versions of documents.
>
> * A google custom search.
>
> All of this is now visible on newd
A few minutes ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
>
> The other thing that would be nice is if the prior versions of the
> docs also included these updates too, but if that can't happen
> easily, oh well.
Yes -- they all have that. It's just that the previous versions that
are generated now are inaccessible..
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:54 AM, mikel evins wrote:
> Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and more
> apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and source files are
> somehow mutually exclusive. They're not. Adding the ability to save and load
> images d
What about moving the google search to the search results page, saying
something like "didn't find what you were looking for? Try a google-based
search." instead of having two searches next to each other in a somewhat
confusing way?
(I think someone else made this suggestion; apologies if I missed
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> There's no practical way to unify the two searches since they are
> implemented in a completely different way all the way to how the end
> user interacts with them.
Neither Racket's search nor Google's one report the racket/format
module, sea
20 minutes ago, mikel evins wrote:
>
> Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and
> more apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and
> source files are somehow mutually exclusive. They're not. Adding the
> ability to save and load images does not subtract
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:54 AM, mikel evins wrote:
>
> > Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and
> more apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and source
> files are somehow mutually exclusive. T
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:54 AM, mikel evins wrote:
>
>> Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and more
>> apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and source files
>> are somehow mutually exclusive
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, mikel evins wrote:
>>
>> Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and
>> more apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and
>> source files are somehow mutually exclusive. They're not. Addi
I like it.
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> I have the minimal things that I wanted in a working state now:
>
> * Links to the PDF versions next to the version.
>
> * A selection box for different versions of documents.
>
> * A google custom search.
>
> All of this is no
Four hours ago, mikel evins wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >
> > Aha -- in that case, it seems that your image-based workflow is
> > not much different from working with just the sources *and* the
> > (byte-) compiled files that go with them, right?
>
> Imagine me
On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Um, no, I don't think that this is similar.
Okay.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Four hours ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> I like it.
It's up now, at docs.racket-lang.org .
8 hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> What about moving the google search to the search results page,
> saying something like "didn't find what you were looking for? Try a
> google-based search." inst
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> They are already indexed, but it happens to be a very popular name so
> there are tons of results before it. (Try searching for "stxparam" to
> see that it works.)
Ooops. You are right. I gave up too soon.
_
Racke
21 matches
Mail list logo
