All in one answer
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:30:11 +0200, Neil Toronto
wrote:
On 10/01/2013 09:20 AM, Tobias Hammer wrote:
* monolithic math
currently math is one big package and installing it pulls in nearly
everything through the docs. Is it planned to split it into -lib and
-doc?
We were
I have a long-running random simulation that spits out debug messages. I
extrapolated that it would take 20 hours to get 5,000,000 samples, and
let it run for a day. Here's what I saw when I returned:
Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.90.0.9--2013-10-04(876995d5/d) [3m].
Language: typed/racket [c
Was it black on yellow or red?
Robby
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> I have a long-running random simulation that spits out debug messages. I
> extrapolated that it would take 20 hours to get 5,000,000 samples, and let
> it run for a day. Here's what I saw when I returned
Black on yellow.
On 10/07/2013 09:50 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Was it black on yellow or red?
Robby
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Neil Toronto mailto:neil.toro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have a long-running random simulation that spits out debug
messages. I extrapolated that it would
Then I think that that means that the message came from
rep.rkt's no-user-evaluation-message function and that you either should
have gotten a dialog with an explanation for why it terminated, or you have
the preference 'drracket:show-killed-dialog set to #f. I think that the
only two explanations
This is fantastic! Thank you! I learned a good deal reading it just
now. Comments below:
On 10/06/2013 04:30 PM, David T. Pierson wrote:
1) Should it be broken into separate pages?
I'd leave it as a single page for now. Easier to update.
2) It starts out with the basics of threads. Is th
If you need examples, take a look at:
The Little Book of Semaphores
http://www.greenteapress.com/semaphores/downey05semaphores.pdf
/Jens Axel
2013/10/6 David T. Pierson :
>
> Hi all,
>
> At the hackathon Asumu helped me work on a Guide chapter on concurrency.
>
> Thanks Asumu!
>
> Since th
On Oct 6, 2013, at 1:30 PM, David T. Pierson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> At the hackathon Asumu helped me work on a Guide chapter on concurrency.
>
> Thanks Asumu!
>
> Since then I've fleshed it out some more and pushed a commit to github.
>
> https://github.com/davidtpierson/racket/commit/d2fb85
I have that preference set to #f, if this is what it looks like in the
preferences file:
(plt:framework-pref:drracket:show-killed-dialog #f)
Apparently, it got set to #f when I unchecked "Show this dialog next
time" once after I hit Ctrl-K and DrRacket warned me that I couldn't use
the RE
Probably the check box should make finer distinctions, yes (altho the
plumbing inside is the same, as it turns out).
And, FWIW setting it to #t will probably only say "you ran out of memory".
And at the command line, you don't have drracket hogging all that memory so
probably that's the best thing
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:21:26PM -0700, John Clements wrote:
> Isn't this early example:
>
> +@racketblock[
> +(define worker (thread (lambda ()
> + (let loop ()
> + (displayln "Working...")
> + (loop)
> +(sle
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:08:27PM -0400, David Vanderson wrote:
> This is fantastic! Thank you! I learned a good deal reading it
> just now. Comments below:
Great! Thanks for checking it out and commenting.
> make-arithmetic-thread is missing a "(let loop ()" line. Later in
> the same examp
12 matches
Mail list logo
