On Nov 14, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> Currently, DrRacket uses cmd-[ and cmd-] and it seems unfortunate to
>> have to change that by adding another modifier. I see that terminal
>> uses that for cycling windows, and safari and firef
> /Users/matthias/plt/collects/mred/private/wx/common/freeze.rkt:9:0
> internal-error
> /Users/matthias/plt/collects/mred/private/wx/common/freeze.rkt:36:0
> constrained-reply
> /Users/matthias/plt/collects/mred/private/wx/cocoa/window.rkt:151:2
> /Users/matthias/plt/collects/mred/private/wx/coc
Original Message
Subject:Re: [plt-scheme] Recommended style for ncurses ffi?
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:47:59 -0600
From: Michael Forster
To: Kevin Tew
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
How far along did you get with your ncurses impl?
W
6 hours ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I may be parsing your responses wrong Eli, but I don't think we
> should let our use of libffi be a barrier to a good ffi. I see
> (require ffi) to mean "get a good Racket FFI", not "get a Racket
> encoding of libffi".
Of course. I even detailed a number of time
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>> Python's 'ctypes' library, which also uses libffi under the hood, has arrays:
>> http://docs.python.org/library/ctypes.html#arrays
>> and also unions, which we don't have:
>> http://docs.pyth
Someone should write to Danvy and ask him what the heck HE was doing
sleeping on the job. How could a paper on a topic like this not get a
proper Schemer as a reviewer and, if so, why didn't they, uh, read the
paper?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:41 AM, John Clements
wrote:
> Well, he's generous ab
IMO, this is what one should expect from someone when an error is
pointed out in their paper.
It is a bit surprising to me that something like that got thru at
HOSC, of all places, tho.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:41 PM, John Clements
wrote:
> Well, he's generous about it; here's what he h
I may be parsing your responses wrong Eli, but I don't think we should
let our use of libffi be a barrier to a good ffi. I see (require ffi)
to mean "get a good Racket FFI", not "get a Racket encoding of
libffi".
Jay
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two hours ago, Sam Tobi
8 matches
Mail list logo
