Re: [racket-dev] checking package dependencies
Yesterday, Matthew Flatt wrote: > [...] (Sidenote: it would be nice if `--fix-pkg-deps' or something similar could also report redundant dependencies.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Things we could move out of the core
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > wrote: >> >>> So, I think option 2 is right for now, and we should eventually spend >>> cycles on really getting `mzscheme' out of the core. >> >> Ok, I'll focus on that. > > I'm mostly done with this now. Progress in this pull request: > https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/377 This is now done and tested, and I'd appreciate review. There were two test failures: one in `sandbox.rktl`, and one in `cm.rktl`, but neither seems to be related to my changes. Sam _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Things we could move out of the core
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > >> So, I think option 2 is right for now, and we should eventually spend >> cycles on really getting `mzscheme' out of the core. > > Ok, I'll focus on that. I'm mostly done with this now. Progress in this pull request: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/377 The most important commit is the one entitled "Remove most uses of `mzscheme` in the core" (I'm changing the sha1 on rebases). Sam _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] sgl collection
I do not believe anyone maintains it. I use OpenGL a lot and I use the opengl package. It is automatically generated from the spec files and awesome. The only "downside" is that it doesn't have a Racket-y interface (it's a pure FFI), but I actually like this because it's easier to read documentation and other people's code. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Bloch Stephen wrote: > Is anybody maintaining the sgl (OpenGL) collection? I notice from the doc > that it supports OpenGL 1.5; the current version appears to be 4.3 (although > popular textbooks seem to use 3.x). > > Stephen Bloch > sbl...@adelphi.edu > > > > > _ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > -- Jay McCarthy Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Package management
And that's why I made it do that. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> > The package system has a notion of "auto" packages, which are >> > packages that were automatically installed to satisfy >> > dependencies. Also, `raco pkg remove' supports an `--auto' flag >> > for automatically removing auto packages that have no non-auto >> > packages depending on them. >> >> Note that this is also how the deb package manager (on >> Debian/Ubuntu/etc) works, so we have good precedent here. > > I think that all distros do that for a number of years now. > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev -- Jay McCarthy Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
