I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just put the whole tests collection there.)
I'm not sure about compiling tests for the purposes of dependency
checking. It sounds ok, but I have a feeling that I'm forgetting some
reason that we disabled compilation
I believe the reason we disabled compilation was that tests weren't
constrained to depend only on the core. Some tests may use planet
packages, etc. Originally, this was mostly for rackunit, which was a
planet package. This suggests to me that we should (a) remove the test
packages from the
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just put the whole tests collection there.)
Sorry, I should have been more specific; 'tests/racket/stx.rktl' depends on
htdp. I expect that the tests
At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just put the whole tests collection there.)
Sorry, I should have been more
Here's a rough cut at a snapshot build with the new package
organization:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/20130702-c90365e/
While there are plenty of rough edges, enough is in place to show how I
see distributions and packages working with the new organization.
The snapshot page has
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm
Since ICFP early reg has opened, I wanted to reconfirm these dates.
Plus, since there are some Saturday sessions, it might be good to know
more if possible about the Hacketathon on Saturday, in case anyone
isn't sure what to choose?
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Doug Williams
Are there other parameters that can mess this up? case-sensitivity,
numbers, etc.?
Robby
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:26 PM, sa...@racket-lang.org wrote:
samth has updated `master' from 4dcfe9b8b9 to 45c276b5db.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/4dcfe9b8b9..45c276b5db
=[ One Commit
I checked again and there's a page for this:
https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki/RacketCon-Hackathon-2013
So I suppose I'm suggesting fleshing it out more if possible,
including for example the suggested projects.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Greg Hendershott
greghendersh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure there are lots of others. Furthermore, there are a bunch of
other calls to `read` just in the core, let alone the rest of the
distribution, that call `read` without setting parameters. Roughly all
of them are bugs, and maybe security bugs. This one bit me because
it's causing a test
I think various `read's should probably be wrapped with
`with-module-reading-parameterization', but I haven't yet looked
closely.
At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:42:57 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
I'm sure there are lots of others. Furthermore, there are a bunch of
other calls to `read` just in the
Currently, there's one test in 'contract-test.rktl' that fails. The
problem is that the test expects 'contract-test.rktl' to be in the
main collects directory, but it isn't -- it's in the `racket-test`
package. What we want is to have it detect that it's in a package,
but doing that has two
I've just committed support for building Racket automatically on the
Travis continuous integration service. See
https://travis-ci.org/samth/racket/ for the current build state. This
doesn't track the actual `plt/racket` repository yet [1], but once it
does, it will do the following:
- Build
I looked into this too and didn't come up with a good solution.
It would be nice if there were a way to write the here's a path, please
tell me which part to replace with pkg/something without too many
dependencies, but I didn't try to see if that would be feasible.
Meanwhile, I agree that just
Could you simply forge the source location on the syntax object to make it
look like it's from a collection?
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.eduwrote:
I looked into this too and didn't come up with a good solution.
It would be nice if there
Oh, that's a good idea! I'll do that (later). Stupid me for not seeing that.
It would be great to get pkg/x into error messages at some point, but I
shouldn't have confused these two.
Thanks,
Robby
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Could you simply forge
17 matches
Mail list logo
