Matthew Flatt wrote:
>Thanks! The pull request is now merged.
I just tried it and it failed the same way as before.
I'll install the devel/libffi package tomorrow and see how that goes.
Philippe
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think the problem is the way that the release and development version
> numbers got out of sync for a while. Version 5.3.6 is derived fairly
> directly from v5.3.4 (and v5.3.5) by adding only a small set of bug-fix
> patches. Version 5.3.6
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > I think the problem is the way that the release and development version
> > numbers got out of sync for a while. Version 5.3.6 is derived fairly
> > directly from v5.3.4 (and v5.3
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>>
>> Also FWIW:
>>
>> WARNING: collected information for key multiple times:
>> '(exporting-libraries #f); values: '(typed/srfi/14) '(typed/rackunit)
>> WARNING: collected information for key multiple times:
>> '(exporting-libraries #f);
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:31:26 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Matthew Flatt
> wrote:
> > >
> > > In this particular case, if `raco setup` hadn't reported failure, the
> > > builds might have hobbled alo
At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:31:26 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> >
> > In this particular case, if `raco setup` hadn't reported failure, the
> > builds might have hobbled along; I'm not sure. The snapshot build
> > generally relies on depende
No problem. It was easy to tweak and re-run (and one lost day is not a big
deal either).
Robby
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-09-17 06:15:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Yes, please treat missing package dependencies the same as any other
> > build error. M
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> FWIW, for an individual file in a repo clone, you can follow history
> through the split by using `git log --follow`. But there's no way to do
> that in the GitHub web interface, as far as I know.
Also rather frustratingly, there's no way
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> In this particular case, if `raco setup` hadn't reported failure, the
> builds might have hobbled along; I'm not sure. The snapshot build
> generally relies on dependencies being accurate, and I don't think it's
> worth thinking hard about
On 2013-09-17 06:15:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Yes, please treat missing package dependencies the same as any other
> build error. Mistakes will happen, but they should be corrected as soon
> as possible, even if it requires a stop-gap solution.
Whoops, sorry for breaking the snapshots. I th
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the
>> > missing dependency declarations
I think the problem is the way that the release and development version
numbers got out of sync for a while. Version 5.3.6 is derived fairly
directly from v5.3.4 (and v5.3.5) by adding only a small set of bug-fix
patches. Version 5.3.6 has almost nothing that was added in the
v5.3.4.x development s
At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:03:30 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the
> > missing dependency declarations
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the
> missing dependency declarations so I can restart the northwestern snapshots.
>
> Is this a situation where
On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
wrote:
>
> FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the missing
dependency declarations so I can restart the northwestern snapshots.
Is this a situation where we can make the builds more robust? Presumably
this issue wouldn't have prev
FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the missing
dependency declarations so I can restart the northwestern snapshots.
Also FWIW:
WARNING: collected information for key multiple times:
'(exporting-libraries #f); values: '(typed/srfi/14) '(typed/rackunit)
WARNING: collected
16 matches
Mail list logo
