Okay, I've extended the readtable.
At-exp is preferable, and I do use at-exps in other circumstances.
Thank you, Greg.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
> Well, I think Ryan is talking about people who are coding a new
> feature that's nearly ready. Not soliciting ideas for
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:48:39PM -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> http://drdr.racket-lang.org/27688/pkgs/rackunit-pkgs/rackunit-test/tests/rackunit/run-tests.rkt
>
> One thing that you will see is that as part of testing there are some
> failing tests to see what happens, but the tests deliberately
Okay, I've pushed that change.
Thanks,
Robby
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:29 AM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> Indeed it would.
> -Ian
> - Original Message -
> From: Robby Findler
> To: J. Ian Johnson
> Cc: dev
> Sent: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:58:28 -0500 (EST)
> Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Slideshow
Well, I think Ryan is talking about people who are coding a new
feature that's nearly ready. Not soliciting ideas for last-minute
ideas to try to rush into v6. Nice try, though. :)
Having said that, have you tried using at-exps for this?
I've only thought about this for a few minutes, and there a
Indeed it would.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: Robby Findler
To: J. Ian Johnson
Cc: dev
Sent: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:58:28 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Slideshow package needs more splitting
I guess probably everything except play, play-n, and animate-slide could be
split out. Wo
5 matches
Mail list logo