Re: [racket-dev] Release for v6.0 is about to begin

2013-11-05 Thread WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju
Okay, I've extended the readtable. At-exp is preferable, and I do use at-exps in other circumstances. Thank you, Greg. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote: > Well, I think Ryan is talking about people who are coding a new > feature that's nearly ready. Not soliciting ideas for

Re: [racket-dev] how to test rackunit

2013-11-05 Thread David T. Pierson
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:48:39PM -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote: > http://drdr.racket-lang.org/27688/pkgs/rackunit-pkgs/rackunit-test/tests/rackunit/run-tests.rkt > > One thing that you will see is that as part of testing there are some > failing tests to see what happens, but the tests deliberately

Re: [racket-dev] Slideshow package needs more splitting

2013-11-05 Thread Robby Findler
Okay, I've pushed that change. Thanks, Robby On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:29 AM, J. Ian Johnson wrote: > Indeed it would. > -Ian > - Original Message - > From: Robby Findler > To: J. Ian Johnson > Cc: dev > Sent: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:58:28 -0500 (EST) > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Slideshow

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v6.0 is about to begin

2013-11-05 Thread Greg Hendershott
Well, I think Ryan is talking about people who are coding a new feature that's nearly ready. Not soliciting ideas for last-minute ideas to try to rush into v6. Nice try, though. :) Having said that, have you tried using at-exps for this? I've only thought about this for a few minutes, and there a

Re: [racket-dev] Slideshow package needs more splitting

2013-11-05 Thread J. Ian Johnson
Indeed it would. -Ian - Original Message - From: Robby Findler To: J. Ian Johnson Cc: dev Sent: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:58:28 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Slideshow package needs more splitting I guess probably everything except play, play-n, and animate-slide could be split out. Wo