On 04/25/2011 10:32 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Anyone recognize this? (git up is git pull --ff-only --stat --all)
C:\Users\Administrator\git\exp\plt>git up
Fetching origin
error: unable to resolve reference refs/remotes/origin/master: No error
From git:plt
! [new branch] master -> ori
On 04/21/2011 01:07 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
-B- When it comes to raw computational performance (ignore loading Racket, start from
REPL and run a single game -- 10 seconds), my implementation is faster than Python
(but barely) and one of the Java implementations. But one Java implementatio
On 04/29/2011 12:10 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
"Scheme" is usually a liability when someone used it in school years ago
(other than with HtDP).
Sad.
but true. Exacerbated by lecturers who refused to keep up with the
world around t
On 05/04/2011 03:57 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
A simple experiment I just performed suggests that a monomorphic
inline cache hit can reduce the time needed for a send in Racket from
350ns to around 60ns, which is a massive win. I've attached the
program I used to measure this, FWIW. (Run it us
On 07/01/2011 04:33 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Does anyone know how to deal with updating a wikipedia image?
Does uploading a new file to the same name work?
- Daniel
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/
On 07/10/2011 01:51 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Ok, `4racket' and a beer for anyone who knows why.
A pun on forehand? Racketlon?
If you're looking for odd names,
rash: racket shell
riti: racket interactive text/terminal interface
and Scribble needs to loose its Scheming name and become Rabble.
O
On 07/01/2012 09:27 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
There rare cases where it is useful to have a value that means that no
argument was passed to a function. In many of these cases there is a
plain value that is used as that mark, with the most idiomatic one
being #f, but sometimes others are used. IMO
In the Racket Guide, the documentation for WHEN and UNLESS says "The
result is # in any case."
http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/begin.html#%28part._when+unless%29
I think that is incorrect. The Racket Reference says # is the
result only when the body is not evaluated.
- Daniel
__
On 07/25/2012 04:50 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Doug Williams wrote:
Racket now includes nan? and infinite? in the core language, which
were already defined and provided by the science collection in PLaneT.
I think you're best off to release a new version of th
On 07/25/2012 12:29 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
What if TR had a notion of const-ness, like in C? Suppose (Vectorof A)
is a subtype of (Const-Vectorof B) when A is a subtype of B, and
(Const-Vectorof A) is never a subtype of (Vectorof B).
In C, "const" is a contract on the function type, not on th
10 matches
Mail list logo
