Thanks, Matthew! It seems to build OK now.
Will
On Sep 11, 2011, at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:44 -0500, "Will M. Farr" wrote:
>> The only wart in the process is the following: when compiling with clang or
>> llvm-gcc with the -O4 o
Hello Racket Developers,
I thought I would write a quick note about building Racket on Mac OS X 10.6.8
with the new clang compiler (the new front-end to the LLVM compiler backend
that is becoming the standard compiler on Mac OS X for XCode 4 and later).
Overall, it's been a good experience. A
Hello all,
The attached patch against the current git master adds an flvector-copy
procedure (along with docs and tests); it's simple, but nice to have in the
flvector library. Let me know if there are any issues with including this in
racket.
Thanks,
Will
0004-Added-flvector-copy-with-tes
FYI, I've submitted a bug to the bug tracker detailing this problem.
Will
On Sep 11, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Will M. Farr wrote:
> I've finished the testing of configure options. It seems to be the places
> library. Running with or without optimization options, the --enable-p
at 4:39 PM, Will M. Farr wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> My laptop has a version of the tree
>> from about 10 days ago and I'm not seeing any errors there. Is there
>> something more that would help me reproduce this behavior?
>>
On Sep 11, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> My laptop has a version of the tree
> from about 10 days ago and I'm not seeing any errors there. Is there
> something more that would help me reproduce this behavior?
>
> Thanks,
> Robby
Huh. Or maybe it's option 4: system/OS dependent. I'm
Hello developers,
I've been compiling Racket from git a lot lately (working on some iteration
forms that now appear in the repository---thanks Sam!), and each time I do, I
run the test suite. For the past few weeks (month?) I've been getting a lot of
errors related to the contract system. I t
r checking so you
>> might want to look at it. I also have for/fold/vector and some
>> sequence abstractions. The code is all parameterised at expansion time
>> by the vector representation.
>>
>> http://github.com/noelwelsh/numeric
>>
>> N.
>>
>&
On Aug 24, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> (I don't quite understand why there's no extra cost for the second access,
> but I'll think about it and figure it out.)
If I understand things correctly, the short answer is "fancy hardware." The
page is marked as read-only in the MMU,
On Aug 23, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> Maybe you want to thread the vector index through using `for/fold'
> instead of drawing the index from a sequence. The expansion could
> insert enough `#:when' clauses to compare the index to the length
> before each nested iteration.
>
This
2, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Noel Welsh wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Will M. Farr wrote:
>> Matthew & co,
> ...
>> I'll make sure to throw a syntax error if I see a #:when in the for-clauses,
>> and I think I should give up on the for*/vector #:length variant
Matthew & co,
On Aug 21, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I didn't think of this before, but probably you should add a check that
> the length expression proceduces a nonnegative exact integer:
>
> (syntax/loc stx
> (let ((len length-expr))
> (unless (exact-
Matthew,
Thanks very much for the comments. I'll get to work preparing an updated
version using #:size soon, and send it to Sam for pushing. As for the issue of
a #:size that doesn't match the length of the iteration, I have been thinking
about adding a check inside the loop (for sizes that a
Sam,
On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>> The for/... forms have the option of having a first expression that gives
>> the length of the resulting object (similar to srfi-42's vector-of-length-ec
>> form) to allow generating more efficient code:
>>
>> (for/vector ((x
Hello all,
I've been thinking for a while about putting together a PLaneT library of some
iteration/comprehension forms that I often use that are not found in the racket
core. Right now, I have a small it-comp.plt local PLaneT package that contains
for/vector
for/flvector
in-flvector
The for/
15 matches
Mail list logo