I've put in my email and password, but clicking Log In does nothing.
Neither does pressing enter. Anyone else seeing this behavior, or know
what the problem is?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Thanks, that worked.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Kazuhiro HISHINUMA k...@cs.meiji.ac.jpwrote:
Me too. I think your browser maybe blocks SSL certificate of
https://pkg.racket-lang.org/.
Try to access https://pkg.racket-lang.org/ and approve its certificate.
(2014/01
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu
- Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
justified set-add and set-add! In one interface.
And if we separate them, we need one interface with just queries, then four
more for add, remove, add!, and remove!, at the very least. It's a messy
direction to go in.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Oct 2, 2013 4
Perhaps some macro hackery on the defmodule form to make it into
defmodule-if-exists and only document that the module is typed if it is
actually installed?
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2013-09-16 16:17:33 -0400, as...@racket
Does run-analysis have the form (lambda () actually-run-analysis)?
Because if not, that's the problem.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Sep 9, 2013 11:55 AM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I'm running my analysis benchmarks in the context
Argh, sorry, I read the docs for the wrong one, sorry for the misleading
response.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Sep 9, 2013 12:16 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I changed it to (call-with-limits (* 30 60) 2048 (lambda ()
run-analysis
.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
Among the bodys, besides stopping the iteration and preventing
later
body evaluations, a #:break guard-expr or #:final guard-expr clause
starts a
new internal-definition context
They have to be separate internal definition contexts in order for #:break
and #:final to be able to stop execution before the definitions themselves
get run.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Among the bodys, besides stopping
-for-body.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Sorry that I forgot to add the `let` while turning the code you sent
into a full example. Here's another try.
#lang racket/base
(require (for-syntax racket/base
syntax/parse
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
They have to be separate internal definition contexts in order for
#:break
and #:final to be able to stop execution before the definitions
Right, that's the issue with needing the (let () result) in my
define-syntax-rule version. I still didn't need split-for-body, which
doesn't guarantee there are no definitions in the post ... part. All it
guarantees to eliminate are #:final and #:break.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12
-rule (for/print/fixed clauses pre .. result)
(for clauses
pre ...
(printf ~v\n (let () result
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
#lang racket/base
(require (for-syntax racket/base
syntax/parse
), but that's still simpler than
using split-for-body.
My question is -- have I overlooked some clever subtlety here that makes
split-for-body necessary, or is it usually easier to just decompose pre ...
result rather than bothering with split-for-body?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket
,
obviously.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:58 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Weird you can't repro.
I only use hasheq when I know the keys are symbols, or the table is local
and only used for a graph traversal (where the graph is not changing during
traversal).
-Ian
You'd have to ask Ryan to be sure, but I think they're pretty stable. I've
been using them for some time.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Ah, thanks. That's exactly what I wanted.
How stable are these features? Shall I add them
representation, but they don't combine
representations.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
No, it doesn't seem to be using the fallback in this case.
ianj@sampson:~/racket/racket/bin$ ./racket -il xrepl
Welcome to Racket v5.90.0.8.
- (set
is. So currently, I just reject all of them.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.comwrote:
I find this an unsatisfying consequence of the implementation and not
necessary. For instance, you could implement set-union purely
generically as:
(define
get X.
So now you just have X bound in both clauses, and that's automatically made
an attribute of AorB, and it all works like you want.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Is there a way for a syntax-class to automatically inherit attributes
Ian, sets are now a generic datatype, like dictionaries. Association lists
are dictionaries, and lists are now sets. They're also streams and
sequences. They're not just set-like.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:56 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I just wasted about 2
name, since hash-set and hash-set! are already existing,
unrelated functions.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:08 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Okay, I can abide. However, that doesn't really get at my frustration. I'm
using the set constructor, that appears to now
/generic if it's not
working.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I'm starting to use generics, and me being myself, I wrote some macros to
make writing method definitions easier.
But, I'm seeing that #:methods seems to rebind method identifiers
The method names are always going to be in the context of the generic
interface name. There's nowhere else they can come from.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:39 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
WRT the struct abstraction, using syntax-local-introduce on
#'gen:binds
the error free-box: undefined because the
#:fast-defaults predicate is lifted to a definition that comes before the
definition of the free-box method. I'll fix that by reordering the
definitions; meanwhile you can fix that by just eta-expanding your use of
compose.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013
Mind you, I don't think this example -- using a method in a #:fast-defaults
predicate -- can work. The implementation of free-box will have to check
the predicate in order to perform generic dispatch, and the predicate has
to call free-box, so it will diverge.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 16
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
With that in mind, I think it would make sense to move `set-first' and
`set-empty?' to the primitive set (making it clear that they are
optional, and can be derived from `set-stream' if need be). With those
two in
on things that need to
be implemented methods, without having to restate them all.
For the implementation, what we have would fit the docs, and it might also
be possible to slightly improve the error messages with some refactoring.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Stephen Chang stch
, or if I just forgot to think that whole thing
through.
Do you have examples of which ones don't come for free with the primitive
methods?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Just played a bit with gen:set. It looks great and in particular
to primitive methods (in some sense) if all else failed.
Would it be better to just remove the primitve / derived distinction,
since it's somewhat artificial, and leave it up to the individual method
descriptions? Is there some better way I should be describing things?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 1
be derivable.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Would it be better to just remove the primitve / derived distinction,
since it's somewhat artificial, and leave it up to the individual method
descriptions? Is there some better way I should
only
need to do it once. Hopefully I misunderstood git-subtree, but if I
didn't, I found its interface disappointing.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2013-07-27 07:10:54 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
I'm still unsure that submodules
Yes, instead you want to run 'make' at the top of the repository.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Jul 29, 2013 12:23 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I've done a complete nuke of my local racket install, and many things have
just broken. The two
. It still wants to use the search page from the other, now
nonexistent, tree. Anyone know what might be going wrong? I'm going
insane here trying to figure out what lingering reference there might be to
the now-removed tree.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http
That fixed it, thanks Matthew!
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
When you visit the main user-specific documentation page, then a cookie
is installed to remember that page as your user-specific page (which
would include user-scoped
After some fixes, mostly to contracts and documentation, I've pushed the
new generics and set features to the master branch.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
My work on adding gen:set, and related changes to define-generics and
gen:dict
I currently use PLTADDONDIR to make each repo's packages install to a
different place, within the repo tree, so that they're both separate, and
get cleaned up if and when I remove the repo. Will that still work with
these changes?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Matthew Flatt
Thanks for those pointers, Tobias, I'll get those fixed.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Tobias Hammer tobias.ham...@dlr.de wrote:
I really like the new set features, especially mutable sets and lists as
sets.
Two things i have notices:
* The docs for set-intersect seem
My work on adding gen:set, and related changes to define-generics and
gen:dict, is ready for review and (hopefully) to push to the master
branch. The branch moved in the process of cleaning things up, it's now at:
https://github.com/carl-eastlund/racket/tree/generics-from-scratch
(The from
for every use of #%declare in the code base, and tracking down
every macro that can possibly expand into it.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
When compiling a fresh git head clone, I still get some cross-phase
persistence errors (see below
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu
- Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
; it allows define/generic and
unsupported (absent) methods
- there is now a #:fallbacks option for define-generics
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
level? Or is there a smarter way to
use them that I'm missing?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
, what does?
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
/git/racket/generics/racket/lib/collects/compiler/cm.rkt:622:2:
do-check
raco setup:
/Users/cce/git/racket/generics/racket/lib/collects/compiler/cm.rkt:703:4
raco setup:
/Users/cce/git/racket/generics/racket/lib/collects/setup/parallel-do.rkt:420:20:
loop
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:15:46 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 07/10/2013 09:04 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently trying to fix the Typed Racket unit tests. I think I've
narrowed
a dissertation to try to solve it. I hope we're not repeating
their mistake, but it seems like we have yet another flat namespace with no
resolution mechanism.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
the default distribution, and (b) re-enable compilation for
them. That way the dependencies will be computed properly. It also
suggests that if they aren't already included, perhaps we should add planet
packages to the list of things we consider among dependencies?
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013
Could you simply forge the source location on the syntax object to make it
look like it's from a collection?
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.eduwrote:
I looked into this too and didn't come up with a good solution.
It would be nice
That all sounds like exactly what I had in mind, with different (pretty
much better) terminology.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The package system has a notion of auto packages, which are packages
that were automatically installed
What does being so fundamental have to do with being in the core vs being
in a package? We should not confuse putting things in packages with making
them second-class concepts. We can put racket/sandbox in a package without
necessarily making it any less fundamental to Racket.
Carl Eastlund
module path:
#path:/Users/cce/git/racket/plt/build/native-pkgs/gui-x86_64-macosx/racket/string.rkt
path:
/Users/cce/git/racket/plt/build/native-pkgs/gui-x86_64-macosx/racket/string.rkt
system error: No such file or directory; errno=2
Anyone know what's up?
Carl Eastlund
like any other change./rant
Anyway, if any of you out there are having trouble rebasing onto Matthew's
packages branch, try the commands above.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Here's the latest (in a pkg2 branch):
https://github.com
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
20 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
[...]
git rebase -s recursive -X rename-threshold=50% mflatt/pkg2
From a brief reading, I think that you're much better off with
-X subtree=/some/path. There's also a subtree
I ran 'make', after rebasing, and eventually got this error:
pkg: missing dependencies
for package: pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib
missing packages:
gui-x86_64-macosx
Anyone know what might have gone wrong?
--Carl
_
Racket Developers list:
. This is still a work in progress, it will be a while before it's
ready for final review and push.
https://github.com/carl-eastlund/racket/tree/generic-sets
For sets, the main purpose has been to add gen:set and allow the set
datatype to be extended. Along with that, I've added mutable sets
names based on PLTCOMPILEDROOTS and similar settings. Thanks to Matthew
for reviewing the diff.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
It looks like get-module-code from syntax/modcode does what I want
internally. I've submitted a pull request
I vote for this change. I'll happily update my package in order to make it
easier for others to contribute new ones.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I think more people need to speak up on this question --- particularly
authors
if it weren't
a great system; we've come a long way from distributing source code via
.plt files, to having something worth using to bundle up our core
software.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.comwrote:
I'll try to respond to these four messages
It does run 'raco setup', it just doesn't have much to do in response to a
failure, at least right now.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote:
Also, Jay: can you explain more why 'raco setup' isn't something that we
should think about
instead of
SOURCE_rkt.zo I want to create SOURCE_rkt.lisp or some such. Is _this_
functionality available somewhere?
I think that's all I would need to get started. Any help would be
appreciated, thanks.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket
into define and so forth. That makes this a fairly big change,
line-by-line; sorry about that, I know it makes reading the diff tougher,
but it made it easier to figure out what I was working with in the file.
Carl Eastlund
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote
Also if you're going to memoize things, why are you using assoc rather than
a hash table? Or if at all possible, a weak hash table?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.eduwrote:
Can't we do better than a memo table?
On Thursday, June 6, 2013
Good point. Might be an argument for a
procedure-closure-contents-hash-code function. Of course, never mind that
if you can forego memoization entirely.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:39:57 -0400,
Carl Eastlund
fresh.rkt original.rkt identical.rkt different.rkt)
(begin-for-syntax
(unless (free-identifier=? original identical)
(error 'fresh ~v != ~v\n original identical))
(when (free-identifier=? original different)
(error 'fresh ~v == ~v\n original different)))
--
Carl Eastlund
I want a non-probabilistic guarantee of uniqueness, partly because I'd
rather not rely on something nondeterministic, and partly because in an
ideal solution, I'd like to have control over the printed names of these
identifiers.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Eric Dobson
. So unless someone has a
breakthrough and can solve this problem purely using identifiers, I'll look
to other kinds of solutions for now.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I'm having trouble creating identifiers that are unique with respect
module and have them be immediately unique via free-identifier=?, as
the binding would not have taken effect yet, so to speak. This is one of
those cases where my life would be so much easier if I could relax any one
of the constraints I'm working under.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:58
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naive use of git
filter-branch might not retain the history, it should be entirely
possible to do something a little more intelligent
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naive use
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Just now, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
It doesn't seem wrong to me. It's an accurate
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
On May 23, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
2. Is it possible that we could solve the problem via a
bootstrapping-only violation of our policy that you can add types to Racket
w/o
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 05/23/2013 01:57 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
Some modules have macros which expand into identifiers that are not
exported, as they want to protect those bindings. TR currently has the
following code which allows it to
?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
On 05/23/2013 01:57 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
Some modules have macros which expand into identifiers that are not
exported, as they want to protect
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:41 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
That's true, but the downside of changing the structure and having
files and directories move post structure change will completely
destroy the relevant edit
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
On 05/20/13 23:24, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
On 2013-05-20 14:42:15 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Eventually, when the dust settles
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2013-05-20 14:42:15 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Eventually, when the dust settles, I think we'll want to convert every
directory to its own git repo, and then we can incorporate the
individual repos as git
the rename comes from.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I'm confused about an aspect of set! and rename transformers. I'll
explain with this example:
#lang racket
;; a macro that uses `syntax-local-value/immediate`
(define
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote
* Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu
- Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
Done.
--Carl
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
see any reason to close this stuff off, when it's the one useful,
non-opaque aspect of procedure values.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Is there a real need to make this whole thing a public interface? I'd
think that a general direction
the two arity-includes? functions, I wasn't sure whether
the extra overloading would make things clearer or more confused. I can
see doing it either way.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
OK, that's a valid use case -- but isn't it better
than it has been previously.
Thanks to anyone [especially if your name is Matthew Flatt] who can give
this all a look!
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
, and that doesn't make a lot of sense. Presumably
these should be restricted to cross-expr as well.
Carl Eastlund
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
These seem great. I'd like to build a macro that defines cross-phase
persistent structures, so that I can make
the situation.
Second, for a name, how about some variation of phase-global or
cross-phase?
An amusing but probably not too informative name: one-phase-fits-all. ;)
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
Greetings.
On 2013 Feb 27, at 01:14, Matthew
should make the http:// version
automatically redirect to the https:// version. The current behavior is
very confusing.
Sorry for any redundancy if this is already on a todo list for the release
somewhere.
Carl Eastlund
P.S. Sorry for any redundancy if this is already on a todo list
I maintain that I went to the right website, you just didn't know it yet.
;-)
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, someone else reported that when they go to a different website
than the PNR they don't get to the PNR. I have it on my
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu
- Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
that Planet2 simplifies the require lines, and makes user packages on a
peer level with built-in collections, is a useful thing to put early on in
the Planet2 docs.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
The documentation already says A package
It doesn't need to be phrased as a comparison to Planet1, but it can be
given as a reassurance that this package system thingy does not add any
baggage to require lines.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree in that context
,
if it doesn't already exist.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Throw cons? in with empty?, please.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2012-12-13 12:44:38 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Does this sound reasonable?
+1. While we're at it, might as well also put at least `empty` and
`empty
If they do the wrong thing, we should fix them, not deprecate them. We're
not LISP, let's not promote car/cdr as the primary names for list
operations.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
-1, since they are different from what some people
operations. I use them all the time, and it makes me write
different code in racket/base than in racket when I can't get them. I
would like to either always have them, or be convinced of why I should
never have them.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar
-lang.org for
plt-etc.byu.edu:9003 and legacy.planet2.racket-lang.org for ...:9004, or
something like that? That would be more intuitive for anyone looking at
the URLs, and flexible in case we decide to move the hosting at a later
date.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list
too much mucking about with
experimental versioning systems. But I think an initial period of
crowd-sourcing the design of that system will do us some good.
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm trying to understand how things are supposed
of other paired names that aren't already taken for
conditional special forms.
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:16 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I just made a pull request for making and/or expand to functions that
perform and/or following a discussion with stamourv and asumu
terribly plainly to begin with.
--Carl
Carl Eastlund
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:41:37 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I think two additions/refinements would be good here:
1. The section on identifier macros in the Guide
leave both cases in, we at least need to make sure
programs that run on Windows and Unix don't break on Mac due to package
names conflicting on the filesystem.
Carl Eastlund
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Yay!
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a typo in the docs. Numbers are allowed.
Jay
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Currently (the latest nightly build), the names of Planet 2 packages
)
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
When doing quick experiments, I've often wanted the ability to define
a new language and then use it in the same file. I thought submodules
might allow me to do this, but I've realized that I still can't
supported this pattern. I would, however, entirely support
renaming this pattern to something more obscure, like
match:pattern-variable or something, so that unintentional uses stop
being a problem.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.comwrote
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
