The search command got changed a little while ago, I think. :)
But I think you should got from 1/n to n/n. (The text search is a
little more complex because you can be before or after the first /
last hit.)
Robby
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:34 PM, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:56 AM, mlsm...@cs.vassar.edu wrote:
A new problem report is waiting at
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=viewpr=11166
Reported by Marc Smith for release: 5.0.1
*** Description:
When stepping through a program in BSL, the stepper shows current progress,
e.g.,
0/3, 1/3, 2/3
But since the step numbers start at 0, the progress only goes to (n-1)/n,
and not n/n when the user has stepped through the entire program.
I didn't notice this situation, but my students did during class, which
became their first lesson in 0-based indexing (for better or worse).
Thanks! Marc
That was a deliberate choice, though I could be convinced that it was the
wrong one; I think I was trying to mirror the behavior of the current
search command.
Any other opinions?
John
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
