On 24 Apr 2011, at 2:04:47, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Kathy Gray kathryn.g...@cl.cam.ac.uk
- Test Engine Tests
Done
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
On 04/25/2011 01:48 AM, Noel Welsh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Ryan Culpepperry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Noel Welshnoelwe...@gmail.com
- Rackunit Tests
- SRFI Tests
- Ensure that all claimed srfi's are in the installer and they all
load into racket or drracket (as
Ok, thanks. That's 90% of the work done.
N.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I just ran the test scripts for Rackunit and the SRFIs without problems, so
I'm marking your items as done.
Ryan
_
For
Can you please post what you usually do and I'm sure someone (me, if
no one else) will do it.
Thanks,
Robby
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com
-
Sorry for the stupid question, but I can't seem to retrieve the tests.
Am I using the wrong command?
$ git archive --remote=git://git.racket-lang.org/plt.git release --
collects/tests | tar x
tar: collects/tests/net/websocket/script.js: Cannot open: Permission denied
tar: Exiting with failure
On 04/24/2011 02:39 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
Sorry for the stupid question, but I can't seem to retrieve the tests.
Am I using the wrong command?
$ git archive --remote=git://git.racket-lang.org/plt.git release --
collects/tests | tar x
tar: collects/tests/net/websocket/script.js: Cannot open:
That's the right command. I tried just now and it worked for me. Did it fail
the same way multiple times? If not, perhaps it was a temporary network
failure or something like that. If the failure is repeatable, what platform
are you running?
I figured it out. I was extracting into the wrong
Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
* Mike Sperber sper...@deinprogramm.de
- DMdA Tests
- Stepper Tests
- Signature Tests
Pending the merge of 7f9bd528573ddbe5c3b4607e0b9d842e93662427 into the
release branch, done. (Thanks, Robby!)
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede,
* Greg Cooper g...@cs.brown.edu
- FrTime Tests
Done.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Two days ago, Jon Rafkind wrote:
* Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu
Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
- Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases
compile fine
- Test that the binary installers for both work, try each one in
both normal and
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Michael Sperber
sper...@deinprogramm.de wrote:
Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
* Mike Sperber sper...@deinprogramm.de
- DMdA Tests
- Stepper Tests
- Signature Tests
Pending the merge of 7f9bd528573ddbe5c3b4607e0b9d842e93662427 into the
On Apr 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Also: anyone else who has the energy to fiddle with the teaching
languages a bit, doing some fiddling now would be helpful
I will be fiddling when I do my checks. I tend to wait these days to go as one
of the last ones.
Checklist items for the v5.1.1 release
(using the v5.1.0.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes
On Apr 20, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org
- Stepper Tests
Done.
Updates:
- Stepper Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v5.1.1 as the most current version; email me
to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there
* Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu
Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
- Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases
compile fine
- Test that the binary installers for both work, try each one in
both normal and unix-style installation modes. (just
Source distributions compiled ok. The racket distribution no longer
produces a 'drscheme' executable even though it does produce 'mzscheme'.
Is that a mistake?
On 04/21/2011 11:50 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
* Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu
Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
-
Not a mistake. 'mzscheme' is kept for script-compatibility but
'drscheme' is dropped as part of the name change transition.
Jay
2011/4/21 Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu:
Source distributions compiled ok. The racket distribution no longer
produces a 'drscheme' executable even though it does
All of the plot tests and plot extensions in the science collection work as
expected.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Checklist items for the v5.1.1 release
(using the v5.1.0.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
- DrRacket Tests
all passed except tests/drracket/test-engine-test.rkt and I'll be
looking into that one.
- Framework Tests
- Contracts Tests
- Games Tests
-
Checklist items for the v5.1.1 release
(using the v5.1.0.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes
20 matches
Mail list logo