On Aug 2, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> We should try to make sure that only commit messages from commits in
> the release branch are considered for the release notes process. Do
> we a script that does it or does someone pick through them manually?
The basic set of log messages is retrieved properly, an
The repl bug is a general bug that requires a
systematic change to things. It also hurts
Typed Racket and other things.
On Aug 3, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
> Matthias Felleisen writes:
>
>> I found two things so far:
>>
>> 1. the basic signatures are lowercase in t
Also, the DMdA "list" signature is called "list-of" for HtDP.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Matthias Felleisen writes:
> I found two things so far:
>
> 1. the basic signatures are lowercase in the docs, but are uppercase
>for real.
They are lowercase in the docs because they're lower-case in the DMdA
languages. They're only uppercase in the HtDP languages. (You may
remember tha
On Aug 3, 2010, at 3:08 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
> Matthias Felleisen writes:
>
>> works in Beginner. It turns out however that even the German docs are
>> broken. I should have explored more when Mike merged this in. Then
>> again, I doubt we will have many Americans reading these docs.
>
Matthias Felleisen writes:
> works in Beginner. It turns out however that even the German docs are
> broken. I should have explored more when Mike merged this in. Then
> again, I doubt we will have many Americans reading these docs.
What's broken?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigu
We should try to make sure that only commit messages from commits in
the release branch are considered for the release notes process. Do we
a script that does it or does someone pick through them manually?
Jay
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Eli: are you saying that those
Eli: are you saying that those commits were not included in the
testing bundles? If so, why do we need to re-run the release tests?
(Or is there something else?)
Robby
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Aug 2, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Eli Barz
On Aug 2, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > On Aug 2, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> >> On Aug 2, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >>
> >> > And for the (near) future -- figure out what's happenning in the
> >> > teaching languages. I get the imp
Just to make sure:
Signatures are included because they were merged into the trunk before the
branch was done.
For example,
(define int (signature Real))
(: x int)
(define x 3)
works in Beginner. It turns out however that even the German docs are broken. I
should have explored more when
That's fine with me. I wrote the release note addendum because the
original email contained the blurb, not because I'm stressing about
putting it in.
Jay
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:42:41 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> These are the commits:
>
> Th
At Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:42:41 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> These are the commits:
Those are from July 22, one week after the branch for 5.0.1, so they
would not normally be considered candidates for the 5.0.1 release.
_
For list-related administrati
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Aug 2, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>> > And for the (near) future -- figure out what's happenning in the
>> > teaching languages. I get the impression that things are moving
>> > there
On Aug 2, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > And for the (near) future -- figure out what's happenning in the
> > teaching languages. I get the impression that things are moving
> > there almost randomly.
>
> No, this isn't random; it is unsynchr
On Aug 2, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> And for the (near) future -- figure out what's happenning in the
> teaching languages. I get the impression that things are moving
> there almost randomly.
No, this isn't random; it is unsynchronized:
-- Shriram asked Jay to add define-dat
Signatures are documented but in German. It is on my list to
'translate' this for the next release. -- Matthias
On Aug 2, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I don't know anything about signatures, since they're not documented
> or advertised.
>
> I don't know why it isn't included... I
On Aug 2, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I don't know anything about signatures, since they're not documented
> or advertised.
>
> I don't know why it isn't included... I thought the patch was cherry
> picked. I didn't test it in the release because I added the tests
> for the feature to tests/racket/adva
I don't know anything about signatures, since they're not documented
or advertised.
I don't know why it isn't included... I thought the patch was cherry
picked. I didn't test it in the release because I added the tests for
the feature to tests/racket/advanced.rktl
Jay
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:49
Eli Barzilay writes:
> I don't know of any plan for signatures, but if it would be bad to
> advertise it if it's not included... Jay/Ryan--??
Signatures are already in there (look in the log in collects/lang) -
they're just not documented yet. They already give you this, for
example:
(define
On Aug 2, Michael Sperber wrote:
> Sorry, I'm just seeing this now:
>
> Eli Barzilay writes:
>
> > Final version, after some edits and reorganization.
> > * The Advanced Student Language now supports hash-table
> > primitives, `define-datatype' for defining sets of related
> > structs, and
Sorry, I'm just seeing this now:
Eli Barzilay writes:
> Final version, after some edits and reorganization.
> * The Advanced Student Language now supports hash-table primitives,
> `define-datatype' for defining sets of related structs, and
> `match' for pattern matching.
Is it a good idea
Eli Barzilay wrote:
The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please
send edits or (changes in order) if you see anything.
Still needed:
Ryan:
* Any public (and documented) syntax/parse & macro debugger
additions?
* macro-debugger/emit?
* GUI for rackunit
On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:26 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
>>
>> * The core type system of Typed Racket has been substantially
>> revised. In particular, Typed Racket can now follow significantly
>> more sophisticated reasoning about the relationships between
>> predicates. Additionally, Typed
At Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:17:59 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> * By default `make install' and `raco setup' compile collections in
> parallel on all available processors. (Use `reaco setup -j 1' to
> disable if necessary.)
"reaco" -> "raco"
_
For
On 7/27/10 11:17 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please
send edits or (changes in order) if you see anything.
* Changes (as part of 5.0) in the `racket' language compared to the
`scheme' language include constructor-style printing, a `st
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
>> On Jul 27, Kevin Tew wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Parallel-build is somewhat behind the scenes. I would delay talking
>>> about it until the next release which will include -j documentation
>>> and parallel rendering of docs.
Shouldn't the docs be merge
How is this:
By default make install and raco setup build collects in parallel on all
available processors.
Use env PLT_SETUP_OPTIONS="-j 1" make install or raco setup -j 1 to
build using only one processor.
Kevin
On 07/27/2010 10:06 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
On Jul 27, Kevin Tew wrote:
Kevin & Ryan -- ?
> Kevin:
>
> * Parallel build
>
> Ryan:
>
> * Any public (and documented) syntax/parse & macro debugger
> additions?
>
> * macro-debugger/emit?
>
> * GUI for rackunit?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> Casey:
>
> * Redex news?
>
Nothing noteworthy.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
I'm not sure that any of my items make sense for a release
announcement, but if we need to give a sense that something interesting
happened toward the release, here's an attempt to collect the most
interesting changes into a couple of bullets:
* Changes (as part of 5.0) in the `racket' language
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Some suggested items below, if you have items, please mail me text
> that describes those that you think should be mentioned, and verify
> that the rest should not.
> --
> Mat
On Jul 23, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Some suggested items below, if you have items, please mail me text
> > that describes those that you think should be mentioned, and verify
> > that the rest should not.
>
> I feel like we should menti
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Some suggested items below, if you have items, please mail me text
> that describes those that you think should be mentioned, and verify
> that the rest should not.
I feel like we should mention items that were released in v5.0, since
none of
Chaperones are not yet, I'd say.
Flipping was the frequently requested 2htdp/image thing that's new in
this release (I think it is new anyways). Not just bitmaps, but all
2htdp/images.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Some suggested items below, if you have items, please ma
34 matches
Mail list logo
