Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #21341: master branch updated
Does anyone have a preference or an objection to use this change in the release? * The important bit here is the sh installers for unix -- they're currently using `plt' and `mz'. (There were some complaints about this.) * It's easy to verify -- just run the generated installers. (And look inside the source tgz/zip files.) Even if there are problems, fixing them is just repackaging the installers, keeping the same contents. (Clarification: I don't have an opinion.) A few seconds ago, e...@racket-lang.org wrote: 2cda694 Eli Barzilay e...@racket-lang.org 2010-10-26 07:10 : | Fix the names used by the `sh', `tgz', and `zip' installers to use | `racket', `racket-textual' and `racket-full' instead of `plt', `mz', and | `full'. | | (Also use uniform argument names in packaging functions.) : M collects/meta/build/build | 108 +- -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #21341: master branch updated
I like the change, but I object to late changes in releases. The build script may be an okay exception. My net opinion is no opinion. Jay On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: Does anyone have a preference or an objection to use this change in the release? * The important bit here is the sh installers for unix -- they're currently using `plt' and `mz'. (There were some complaints about this.) * It's easy to verify -- just run the generated installers. (And look inside the source tgz/zip files.) Even if there are problems, fixing them is just repackaging the installers, keeping the same contents. (Clarification: I don't have an opinion.) A few seconds ago, e...@racket-lang.org wrote: 2cda694 Eli Barzilay e...@racket-lang.org 2010-10-26 07:10 : | Fix the names used by the `sh', `tgz', and `zip' installers to use | `racket', `racket-textual' and `racket-full' instead of `plt', `mz', and | `full'. | | (Also use uniform argument names in packaging functions.) : M collects/meta/build/build | 108 +- -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev -- Jay McCarthy j...@cs.byu.edu Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://teammccarthy.org/jay The glory of God is Intelligence - DC 93 _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #21341: master branch updated
10 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote: I like the change, but I object to late changes in releases. The build script may be an okay exception. My net opinion is no opinion. (OK, so I have two weak votes on the two sides now.) The main point that makes this an exception is: * [...] Even if there are problems, fixing them is just repackaging the installers, keeping the same contents. In other words, a bug in code almost always requires a new release, but a bug in packaging requires just re-packaging and that can be done any time (and this has been done in the past when there were packaging issues). -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
