Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc

2011-06-08 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Me too. I like `take-until' as well. 2011/6/8 Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com: I'd really like #:unless as well iPhoneから送信 On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: Anyone seconds this? And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I know that

[racket-dev] `take-until' etc

2011-06-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!

Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc

2011-06-07 Thread Jay McCarthy
I've used them before and I find they read better than using negate. 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org: Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? --          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli