I've pushed a fix for the mac os x problem using materialize-user-docs
because it seems to me to reduce rather than enlarge the number of
different configurations are users are in. It may not actually turn
out to be the conservative change and we can always revisit it when we
have more concrete dat
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:16:32 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>> Oh, *that*'s the other solution? That sounds pretty bad not only
>> because it complicates file installation which is already very
>> complex, but also because it's a significant
At Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:16:32 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
> > The two candidates are the trampoline approach and the "just move the
> > documentation files over into the user space as if a package had been
> > installed".
>
> Oh, *that*'s th
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
>
> Oh, absolutely.
OK, I'll do that later today.
> The two candidates are the trampoline approach and the "just move the
> documentation files over into the user space as if a package had been
> installed".
Oh, *that*'s the other solution?
Would bringing a browser view into DrRacket be a third way, or would that
be no different?
(That said the native win OS and apple OS 'help' browser viewers aren't
exactly inspiring - are they a fourth option?)
S.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 at 21:26 Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:13 PM
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, my apologies. I thought you meant something different.
>>
>> Yes, this works.
>
> Ah, in this case, the patch that I sent earlier should work fine.
> (I could do a pull request
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
>
> Oh, my apologies. I thought you meant something different.
>
> Yes, this works.
Ah, in this case, the patch that I sent earlier should work fine.
(I could do a pull request, but it should really be tested...)
> I don't have a good idea wh
No that doesn't work. You can see why if you follow the technical details
in the thread (and get a Mac maybe).
Matthew is adding something to the setup collection and drr will use it and
we will be all set I expect.
Sam doing some testing after that point will be useful tho.
Robby
On Friday, No
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>
> We have labs of macs here at IU.
[*sigh* at that kind of spending...]
>> And this is why I said that it's not really relevant -- AFAICT, the fact
>> that things are setup in a way that prevents passing queries and
>> fragments mean
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>> Not that it matters, but did you try to see if it's the file
>>> permissions?
>>
>> Oh, they are!
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> And that
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> Not that it matters, but did you try to see if it's the file
>> permissions?
>
> Oh, they are!
>
> [...]
>
> And that was it!!
>
> If I run:
>
> $ xattr -d com.apple.quarantine /Appl
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> No, the browser isn't hiding the query part.
>>
>> Here are the content of two script files:
>>
>> $ cat a.scrpt
>> open location "file:///Applications/r/doc/search/index.html?q=xy
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> No, the browser isn't hiding the query part.
>
> Here are the content of two script files:
>
> $ cat a.scrpt
> open location "file:///Applications/r/doc/search/index.html?q=xyz"
> $ cat b.scrpt
> open location
> "file:///Users/robby/Libra
No, the browser isn't hiding the query part.
Here are the content of two script files:
$ cat a.scrpt
open location "file:///Applications/r/doc/search/index.html?q=xyz"
$ cat b.scrpt
open location
"file:///Users/robby/Library/Racket/development/doc/search/index.html?q=xyz"
Running "osascript a
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
> in DrRacket:
>
>> (send-url "file:///Users/spdegabrielle/hello.html?q=aaaba")
>
> works
>
>> (send-url "file:///Applications/hello.html?q=xyz")
>
> works
In that case I think that it's a different problem than what I
described.
>>
in DrRacket:
> (send-url "file:///Users/spdegabrielle/hello.html?q=aaaba")
works
> (send-url "file:///Applications/hello.html?q=xyz")
works
> (send-url
"file:///Applications/Racket%20v6.1.1.5/doc/search/index.html?q=xyz")
fails
in bash:
Miriams-MacBook-Pro-2:~ spdegabrielle$ open
"fil
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Ah, thanks! I see that if it is trying to load the docs that are in
> /Applications then it runs the code below, which somehow magically
> drops the query argument by the time safari gets it. It's not because
> of the space, either; when I re
Ah, thanks! I see that if it is trying to load the docs that are in
/Applications then it runs the code below, which somehow magically
drops the query argument by the time safari gets it. It's not because
of the space, either; when I rename "Racket v6.1.1.5" to just "r", it
also doesn't work. But i
Is it significant that on the non-working machine running 6.1.1.5
(perform-search "xyz") returns
file:///Applications/Racket%20v6.1.1.5/doc/search/index.html
But my working instance running 6.1.1.5 (it is a day later build)
running (perform-search "XYX") returns
file:///Users/spdegabrielle/Library
This: file:///Applications/Racket%20v6.1.1.5/doc/search/index.html
it just shows the search screen as usual - just without the
search text.
s.
On Wed Nov 19 2014 at 11:58:01 PM Robby Findler
wrote:
> If you navigate to the file in the file: url, is it empty?
>
> Robby
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014
If you navigate to the file in the file: url, is it empty?
Robby
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
> I'm such a doofus I forgot to put it on the bug report
>
> Safari, Version 8.0 (10600.1.25.1)
> file:///Applications/Racket%20v6.1.1.5/doc/search/index.html
>
> OS X 10
I'm such a doofus I forgot to put it on the bug report
Safari, Version 8.0 (10600.1.25.1)
file:///Applications/Racket%20v6.1.1.5/doc/search/index.html
OS X 10.10.1 (14B25)
all updates up-to-date
Welcome to DrRacket, version 6.1.1.5--2014-11-19(6c9172f/a) [3m].
Language: racket/gui; memory limit:
You won't be surprised to learn that my machine is one of the ones
where it works. :(
If I understand correctly, you're getting to the browser, but not
seeing the right thing in the browser? Is that right? If so, what is
the url in the url bar? And which browser? Does it work if you switch
to safa
I just tried it on the latest osx 64 bit full build.
Logged as
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=default&pr=14844&return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fbugs.racket-lang.org%2Fquery%2F%3Fdatabase%3Ddefault%3Bdebug%3D%3BState%3Dany%3Bignoreclosed%3DIgnore%2520Closed%3BSynopsis%3Df1
Hmm. I typed cond, highlighted cond, pressed F1, help on cond came up in
browser. But I built my own Racket from git sources, on 2014-11-06.
> On Nov 19, 2014, at 15:55 , Stephen De Gabrielle
> wrote:
>
> It's the search for selected term.
> S.
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 at 20:54 Geoffrey S. Knau
> On Nov 19, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Geoffrey S. Knauth wrote:
>
> I tried F1 on my Racket 6.1.1 on OSX 10.10.1 and the browser came up with
> Racket help. Is that the same thing? --Geoff
Yes. Interesting. Looks like we’re running the same OS. F5 runs the program for
me, F1 does nothing. Are you
I tried this which worked:
typed the word: cond
highlighted it
right-clicked it
browser came up with:
file:///${HOME}/test/plt/git/plt/racket/doc/search/index.html?q=cond
> On Nov 19, 2014, at 15:53 , Geoffrey S. Knauth wrote:
>
> I tried F1 on my Racket 6.1.1 on OSX 10.10.1 and the browser cam
It's the search for selected term.
S.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 at 20:54 Geoffrey S. Knauth wrote:
> I tried F1 on my Racket 6.1.1 on OSX 10.10.1 and the browser came up with
> Racket help. Is that the same thing? --Geoff
>
> > On Nov 19, 2014, at 15:46 , Kevin Forchione wrote:
> >
> > I’m not sure
I tried F1 on my Racket 6.1.1 on OSX 10.10.1 and the browser came up with
Racket help. Is that the same thing? --Geoff
> On Nov 19, 2014, at 15:46 , Kevin Forchione wrote:
>
> I’m not sure if this has been reported yet, but it seems the PF1 “search in
> help desk for …” feature no longer fun
I've noticed that too.
You can search the bug db at
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/
Kind regards,
S.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 at 20:48 Kevin Forchione wrote:
> I’m not sure if this has been reported yet, but it seems the PF1 “search
> in help desk for …” feature no longer functions with 6.1.1 for
I’m not sure if this has been reported yet, but it seems the PF1 “search in
help desk for …” feature no longer functions with 6.1.1 for Mac OS X 64 bit.
(I’ve not tried other platforms). Is this a setting in preferences that is no
longer on?
-Kevin
_
Racket Developers
31 matches
Mail list logo
