With these two votes, it's official. I'll make it one of my vacation
projects.
Neil ⊥
On 06/26/2012 03:00 PM, Doug Williams wrote:
Doug is for any of it. I'd love to get some student projects that move
the science collection to TR.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
Doug is for any of it. I'd love to get some student projects that move
the science collection to TR.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> I am all for a math/ collection as I said before.
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
>
>> On 06/26/2012 08:04 AM,
I am all for a math/ collection as I said before.
On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 08:04 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>> Just in case: They are available in the Science Collection:
>
> They are - Doug's done good work. I'd convert those to TR, check TR's
> opt
On 06/26/2012 08:04 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
Just in case: They are available in the Science Collection:
They are - Doug's done good work. I'd convert those to TR, check TR's
optimizations, and harden them if they need it (especially near 0.0 and
+/-inf.0). Also, I have a few not in Doug'
On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> But if the goal is to have *much* more mathy functions, then it seems
> better to just have a new toplevel collection.
Yes. And including some from the Science collection would be a good thing,
assuming Doug is okay with it.
___
Three hours ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:07 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
>
> > It would, and I'd be happy to do it while I'm on vacation next
> > month. Can you submit a change request?
> >
> > More generally, what would the Powers That Be think of my adding
> > various s
Just in case: They are available in the Science Collection:
http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/williams/science.plt/4/6/planet-docs/science/mathematical-functions.html#(def._((planet._math..rkt._(williams._science..plt._4._5))._acosh))
/Jens Axel
2012/6/24 Antonio Menezes Leitao :
>
> Come to think of it, racket/math is a great candidate for being
written in Typed Racket but the racket collection has to be compiled before
typed-racket. Is there a way around that?
+1 to that; I agree.
> _
> Racket Developers list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/d
On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:07 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> It would, and I'd be happy to do it while I'm on vacation next month. Can you
> submit a change request?
>
> More generally, what would the Powers That Be think of my adding various
> special functions (like probit, inverse probit, Bessel fun
On 06/24/2012 10:40 AM, Antonio Menezes Leitao wrote:
Hi,
Given that Racket implements the hyperbolic functions
sinh, cosh, and tanh, I would like to suggest that it also
provides the inverse functions asinh, acosh and atanh.
For the moment, I'm living with my own definitions but
it would be ni
Hi,
Given that Racket implements the hyperbolic functions
sinh, cosh, and tanh, I would like to suggest that it also
provides the inverse functions asinh, acosh and atanh.
For the moment, I'm living with my own definitions but
it would be nicer if these were pre-defined.
Best,
Antonio.
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
