5 hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [*] As an example, rackunit might become dependent on drr i
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>>
>>> [*] As an example, rackunit might become dependent on drr in the
>>> future, if it becomes a drr plugin. The cos
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>> [*] As an example, rackunit might become dependent on drr in the
>> future, if it becomes a drr plugin. The cost of that is obvious: you
>> need drr to use rackunit. A possib
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> [*] As an example, rackunit might become dependent on drr in the
> future, if it becomes a drr plugin. The cost of that is obvious: you
> need drr to use rackunit. A possible solution to that, if it becomes
> necessary, is to have another
Four minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> I think Eli is saying that it would create a "bad" dependency where
Yes, the "redundant" was a bad translation of something like "a
dependency we don't really need".
> "badness" isn't something that is easy to say precisely what it is,
> but the rough ide
I think Eli is saying that it would create a "bad" dependency where
"badness" isn't something that is easy to say precisely what it is,
but the rough idea is that there is a hierarchy of modules (ie a
grouping of modules into levels of a tree) and dependencies should go
one direction. Making drrack
On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Yes, please do separate the stepper tests out into another file.
Got it, done.
John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://l
Yes, please do separate the stepper tests out into another file.
Robby
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour and a half ago, John Clements wrote:
>> In certain places, I know that we're trying to be careful to
>> minimize 'require's that occur as part of DrRacket startup
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour and a half ago, John Clements wrote:
>> In certain places, I know that we're trying to be careful to
>> minimize 'require's that occur as part of DrRacket startup. Is
>> 'rackunit' something we're trying to avoid? Specifically, I have o
An hour and a half ago, John Clements wrote:
> In certain places, I know that we're trying to be careful to
> minimize 'require's that occur as part of DrRacket startup. Is
> 'rackunit' something we're trying to avoid? Specifically, I have old
> unit tests in collects/stepper/private/shared.rkt th
In certain places, I know that we're trying to be careful to minimize
'require's that occur as part of DrRacket startup. Is 'rackunit' something
we're trying to avoid? Specifically, I have old unit tests in
collects/stepper/private/shared.rkt that I'd like to revive as rackunit tests.
John
11 matches
Mail list logo
