Re: Review Request 72557: RANGER-2841: Refactor userstore enricher in order to support userstore download without service information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72557/#review220918 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhay Kulkarni On May 29, 2020, 9:24

Review Request 72557: RANGER-2841: Refactor userstore enricher in order to support userstore download without service information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72557/ --- Review request for ranger, Abhay Kulkarni, Ramesh Mani, and Velmurugan

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-2841) Refactor userstore enricher in order to support userstore download without service information

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Polavarapu updated RANGER-2841: --- Attachment: 0001-RANGER-2841-Moved-RangerUserStoreRefresher-out-of-Ra.patch >

[jira] [Commented] (RANGER-2789) GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are more than 1000 users

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119672#comment-17119672 ] RickyMa commented on RANGER-2789: - [~pradeep] : Sorry. It's done. > GET API service/xusers/users turns

[jira] [Created] (RANGER-2841) Refactor userstore enricher in order to support userstore download without service information

Sailaja Polavarapu created RANGER-2841: -- Summary: Refactor userstore enricher in order to support userstore download without service information Key: RANGER-2841 URL:

Re: Review Request 72555: RANGER-2840 : Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

> On May 29, 2020, 9:41 a.m., Pradeep Agrawal wrote: > > security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/PolicyRefUpdater.java > > Line 180 (original), 197 (patched) > > > > > > It seems patch does not cover code

Re: Review Request 72555: RANGER-2840 : Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72555/ --- (Updated May 29, 2020, 11:13 a.m.) Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha,

[jira] [Commented] (RANGER-2789) GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are more than 1000 users

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119493#comment-17119493 ] Pradeep Agrawal commented on RANGER-2789: - [~RickyMa] : please upload the new patch in  the

Re: Review Request 72555: RANGER-2840 : Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72555/#review220915 ---

Re: Review Request 72555: RANGER-2840 : Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72555/#review220914 ---

Re: Review Request 72555: RANGER-2840 : Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72555/#review220912 ---

Re: Review Request 72555: RANGER-2840 : Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72555/ --- (Updated May 29, 2020, 9:18 a.m.) Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha,

Review Request 72555: RANGER-2805 : Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72555/ --- Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Mehul

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-2840) Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dineshkumar Yadav updated RANGER-2840: -- Description: When we try to create multiple policy using API having same non existing

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-2840) Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads creating same group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dineshkumar Yadav updated RANGER-2840: -- Summary: Create policy with non existing group is failing due to to multiple threads

[jira] [Commented] (RANGER-2789) GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are more than 1000 users

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119386#comment-17119386 ] RickyMa commented on RANGER-2789: - [~pradeep] : new patch uploaded~ > GET API service/xusers/users

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-2789) GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are more than 1000 users

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] RickyMa updated RANGER-2789: Attachment: RANGER-2789.patch > GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are more than

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-2789) GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are more than 1000 users

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] RickyMa updated RANGER-2789: Attachment: (was: RANGER-2789.patch) > GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are

[jira] [Commented] (RANGER-2789) GET API service/xusers/users turns very slow when there are more than 1000 users

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119348#comment-17119348 ] RickyMa commented on RANGER-2789: - [~pradeep] : It's all done. I've retested it. Please have a look. >