Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0

+1 votes from > - Arpit Agarwal (binding) > - Uma Maheshwara Rao G (binding) > - Jitendra Pandey (binding) > - Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (non-binding) > - Lokesh Jain (non-binding) > > Regards > Lokesh > > > > On 19-Jul-2020, at 8:40 AM, Jitendra Pandey > wro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0

+1 (binding) -Verified checksums -Built from source successfully -Verified a few unit tests jitendra On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 11:55 AM Tsz Sze wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Verified all checksums and signatures. > - Checked DISCLAIMER LICENSE and NOTICE. > - Built from source successfully.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.6.0 release

+1 for the GA release. On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:33 AM Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > Thanks for starting the discussion thread. > > How about the next release of Ratis be a GA release? > > Thanks, > > Mukul > > On 03/06/20 12:35 pm, Lokesh Jain wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It has been a while since our

Re: Podling Ratis Report Reminder - May 2020

Dear mentors, The podling report for Ratis is available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2020#ratis Please review and approve. Thanks jitendra On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:06 AM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

Hi Justin, A vote was held on the dev list. Here is the archive link. https://s.apache.org/pxcjj Thanks for pointing out, it is good to have a reference to that on this thread. regards On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 9:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Generally a VOTE is held on the dev list

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

+1 (binding) On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > Hi IPMC, > > Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.4.0-rc1 vote [1] is just passed on the PPMC > vote [2]. > Apache Ratis is an embaddable Raft implementation but this release > artifact is only the packaging of some of the 3rd party

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.5.0 rc0

+1 Downloaded source tarball Signatures valid Builds from source Arithmetic example works Works with servers restarted. On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:13 PM Xiaoyu Yao wrote: > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, > > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.5.0 rc0. The git > tag to be voted

Re: Podling Ratis Report Reminder - February 2020

Report has been updated on the Wiki. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/February2020 Mentors, please review and sign off. Thanks On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:03 PM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.5.0 release

o > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> +1. Thanks for fixing those critical issues after 0.4.0. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -Xiaoyu > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 a

Re: Podling Ratis Report Reminder - November 2019

Report has been updated on the Wiki. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/November2019 Mentors, please review and sign off. Thanks On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 12:53 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Just a friendly reminder that this is due in a couple of days and I don't > see

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

+1 (binding) Looks good to me. Validated signatures. On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 2:38 PM Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > The RC looks good to me. Great work, Mukul! > > On 10/30/19 11:00 PM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, > > > > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.3.0 Ratis Thirdparty release

+1 let's put out an RC for voting. On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:22 PM Dinesh Chitlangia wrote: > +1 > > -Dinesh > > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:51 AM Lokesh Jain > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > On 31-Oct-2019, at 5:41 AM, Uma gangumalla > wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Regards, > > > Uma

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.5.0 release

+1, we have made several fixes and improvements as well. On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > Hi Ratis Dev, > > As reported by Henrik Hegardt and Andy Wu, Ratis 0.4.0 release has a > NoClassDefFoundError: > org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/lib/DefaultMetricsSystem problem. > Therefore,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4

+1 (binding) Signatures - OK Built from source - OK Ran filestore loadgen - OK On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:41 PM Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, > > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4. > This is with respect to the discuss mailthread < >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3

+1 (binding) Validates signature, Downloaded and built the source. Ran filestore loadgen example. On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:13 AM Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, > > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3. > This vote is after fixing

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc2

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-658 blocks this. A new RC needed. On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:28 PM Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, > > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc2. > This vote is after fixing issues RATIS-653 & RATIS-654 in the

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2019

Report has been updated on the Wiki. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2019 Mentors, please sign off. Thanks jitendra On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:22 PM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2

+1 Verified checksums Built from source Ran filestore loadgen. On 4/9/19, 12:33 AM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2. The git tag to be voted upon:

Re: Ratis Features

Hi Karim, Thanks for your interest in Apache Ratis. I have added you to Slack channel. These functionalities have been implemented, but configuration management and snapshots are not fully tested. It is expected that there would be more work in these areas as they get tested and stabilized.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

be able to update all the changes. Thanks. > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh > > wrote: > > > > > > +1, > > > > > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote: > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

ill merge everything in master to > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks. > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> There have been many fixes in trunk latel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

+1 There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk. On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: Hi Marton, For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in trunk to 0.3?

Re: Ratis Log Verifier?

Hi Clay, By Log verification you mean correctly formatted, or a tool that can compare the logs of two replicas to verify they are same? On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:17 PM Clay B. wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone have a Ratis log verification tool or can think of a class I > can repurpose for

Re: Ratis Podling report for Feb-2019

ot; wrote: Would it help to break down the last committers/PMC added rather than a single date? I'm guessing we don't have quick access to that information like a TLP does (e.g. via reporter.a.o) On 2/5/19 5:22 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > Here is the draft report for

Ratis Podling report for Feb-2019

Here is the draft report for Apache Ratis for Feb-2019. Please review and provide feedback. Mentors please signoff if it looks ok. Link: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2019 Pasted below: Ratis Ratis is a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol Ratis

Re: Incubator Podling Report (Due 6th February)

Hi Justin, We are working on the report. We will have it ready by 6th. Thanks jitendra On 2/2/19, 9:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi, Can someone please confirm the the PPMC is working on the report for this month as I don't see any activity on list about it. It's due in a

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

+1 (binding) verified checksums, can build from source. On 12/3/18, 9:46 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: Thanks for voting, Marton! PPMC, any chance to throw some quick votes on here for a very small change over the previous release? :) On 12/3/18 11:19 AM, Elek, Marton

Re: [DISCUSS] Next thirdparty release?

+1, always good to release frequently. Since the jira is already marked for fixed version "thirdparty-0.2.0", 0.2.0 looks is fine. On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM Josh Elser wrote: > I've just committed some good work by Xiaoyu to re-add the > netty-tcnative stuff into the thirdparty repo (this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

+1, verified signatures, LICENSE and NOTICE files are present. NOTICE, and LICENSE files, however, do not include copyrights of dependencies. We should plan to address that, if required, in next release. On 11/5/18, 9:54 AM, "Ted Yu" wrote: +1 On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM

Re: Publishing Ratis snapshot (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0)

RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone blocker. On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: (pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion) No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis. On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer

Ratis Podling report for August.

Dear all, I have updated the podling report for Ratis for the month of August at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2018 The text is pasted below BEGIN= Ratis Ratis is a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol Ratis has been incubating

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log "LogService" proposal

+1 On 7/13/18, 1:22 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: Hi all, I'd like to share a document that I've been working on for many months with Jitendra about building a distributed-log "recipe" on top of Ratis.

Re: Guideline to contribute to Ratis

The open issues are at following link. You can take up any issue that is not assigned, or if not being actively worked upon. Just state your interest on the jira that you would want to take that up.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc2)​

+1 Verified the signatures Downloaded the source and built Ran the arithmetic example. On 6/28/18, 9:13 AM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0. Both the licensing problem and the naming problem are fixed

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc1)​

Moving my vote to the right thread. +1 Downloaded the source, verified signatures and ran some unit tests. On 5/21/18, 3:09 PM, "Venkat" wrote: +1 Checked sigatures/hashes.The archive name does not have apache prefix - already raised in this vote

Re: RC1: Call for vote

+1 Downloaded the source, verified signatures and ran some unit tests. On 5/21/18, 11:14 AM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: +1 I have verified all checksums and signatures and run some manual tests with the examples. Everything looks good. Thanks, Marton! Tsz-Wo

Re: 0.2.0 release?

+1 On 5/4/18, 8:15 AM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Sounds great, Thank you very much the work Tsz-Wo, Kit Hui, Lokesh. There is no more blocker in the jira. If no objections I will create the release candidate at the weekend and start the release vote.

Re: Contributor/Committer guidelines?

Jakob, You are already an admin, so you should be able to add contributors. The guidelines are mostly inherited from Hadoop, but we need to spell them out explicitly. jitendra On 3/8/18, 5:38 PM, "Jakob Homan" wrote: I can't find anywhere on the site for guides for

Re: [RESULT][VOTE#2] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

Woohoo! It is beautiful. Thanks, Marton, for making it happen. On 1/22/18, 1:25 AM, "Marton, Elek" wrote: And finally: https://ratis.incubator.apache.org/ is up and running. The source code is at the asf-site-source branch and the html files are commited to

Re: [VOTE] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

+1, Great work. Let’s merge the awesome website. On 12/22/17, 7:06 AM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Hi, RATIS-5 feature branch contains the proposed site for ratis.incubator.apache.org. The final patch is uploaded to the RATIS-5 issue [1] This is the

Re: ratis web page

Lets start a merge vote that will run for 3 days, so that this gets committed later this week. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > The web site looks really good. Thanks a lot for all the hard and > beautiful works! > Nicholas > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Logo

It is ok to vote in this mail thread as well. From: Jitendra Pandey <jiten...@hortonworks.com> Reply-To: "dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org" <dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org> Date: Monday, November 20, 2017 at 11:07 PM To: "dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org" <dev@

Created jenkins job ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86

I have created a nightly ratis build job https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86. Currently, the pre-commit build as well as the nightly are configured to run on RATIS-4 branch for testing. Once testing completes, we will switch the jobs to run on the master.

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2017

I have posted the status at the status page. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2017 Please let me know or feel free to edit the status. I am posting it here as well. Mentors, please sign off on the status. = Ratis Ratis is a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol

Re: contribution

Hi Marton, Do you have a patch for RATIS-95, I don’t see one attached. Thanks jitendra On 7/27/17, 5:36 AM, "Marton, Elek" wrote: Hi, thx the answer. I created multiple issues (RATIS-94/95). I uploaded a patch to RATIS-95. Two questions:

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2-alpha release

+1 On 10/10/17, 8:26 PM, "Anu Engineer" wrote: +1, Ozone would love to get the latest Ratis bits. Thanks Anu On 10/10/17, 8:15 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: It has been more than 4 months after the 0.1-alpha

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2017

The report has been updated on the wiki. On 4/5/17, 5:42 PM, "johndam...@apache.org" wrote: >Dear podling, > >This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache >Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to >prepare your

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.1-alpha release

eems better. > >Tsz-Wo > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <jnpan...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>> Sounds good. But we have to get th