Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
>
>> Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes wrote:
>>> Running sparql queries is actually much easier:
>> I agree that I really should update my archaic sparql queries.
>>
>> What really bothers me is that these radical changes happened
On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes wrote:
>> Running sparql queries is actually much easier:
>
> I agree that I really should update my archaic sparql queries.
>
> What really bothers me is that these radical changes happened in a
> minor
> version i
Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes wrote:
> Running sparql queries is actually much easier:
I agree that I really should update my archaic sparql queries.
What really bothers me is that these radical changes happened in a minor
version increase, which have totall changed the API
> from rdflib.Graph imp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Running sparql queries is actually much easier:
from rdflib.Graph import Graph
g=Graph()
# add some data. ...
res=g.query("SELECT ?x WHERE { ?x ?y ?z. }")
res is now iterable over a tuple of variable bindings, and res also has methods
for doing jso
Hi all,
Today I tried to update some old code I had lying around that was built
using an older version of rdflib, and used rdflib.sparql.SPARQLGraph().
I have not yet managed to update all my code, but looking at examples
and bare documentation so far has led me to one conclusion:
Could you plea
