Re: Looking for contributors for sub-project RocketMQ-JMS

Hi, When are you planning to move JMS code to apache repo? On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Rick Zhang wrote: > Good! Look forward you to returning back to this project in the near > future. > We will try our best to release a early version as soon as possible.

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101991874 --- Diff: client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/impl/MQClientAPIImpl.java --- @@ -278,14 +280,14 @@ public void createTopic(final

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101995717 --- Diff: store/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/AppendMessageResult.java --- @@ -119,6 +129,7 @@ public String toString() {

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101989915 --- Diff: broker/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/processor/SendMessageProcessor.java --- @@ -442,6 +449,202 @@ private

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101994094 --- Diff: common/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/common/message/MessageBatch.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101992848 --- Diff: client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/impl/producer/DefaultMQProducerImpl.java --- @@ -595,8 +596,11 @@ private

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101993057 --- Diff: client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/impl/producer/DefaultMQProducerImpl.java --- @@ -737,6 +742,10 @@ public

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101990343 --- Diff: broker/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/processor/SendMessageProcessor.java --- @@ -442,6 +449,202 @@ private

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r101965587 --- Diff: broker/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/processor/SendMessageProcessor.java --- @@ -72,7 +73,13 @@ public RemotingCommand

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299) Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.677% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299) Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.677% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299) Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.677% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899) Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 31.571% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899) Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 31.571% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899) Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 31.571% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246847) Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.673% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate strateg...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246847) Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.673% when pulling

Re: Looking for contributors for sub-project RocketMQ-JMS

Good! Look forward you to returning back to this project in the near future. We will try our best to release a early version as soon as possible. Sorry for not considering that aspect before. 2017-02-21 11:12 GMT+08:00 dongeforever <1018815...@qq.com>: > Cool. Sorry for a time not involved in

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #64: [ROCKETMQ-102] When shutdown(), the per...

Github user zhouxinyu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/64#discussion_r102128193 --- Diff: client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/consumer/DefaultMQPushConsumer.java --- @@ -461,7 +461,11 @@ public void start()

Re: Looking for contributors for sub-project RocketMQ-JMS

Cool. Sorry for a time not involved in it. Now I am working on the batch feature. After finishing it , more time will spent on this project. Maybe we can release a early version based on the previous work, and get more users involved in. -- Original -- From:

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq pull request #67: [ROCKETMQ-67] Consistent Hash allocate ...

Github user zhouxinyu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67#discussion_r102124935 --- Diff: common/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/common/consistenthash/Node.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

Yes, first three months, then quarterly. Since RocketMQ is group 1, your first quarterly report would be April. As a result, you end up reporting 4 months straight (which is normal, even for TLPs) John On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:31 PM Von Gosling wrote: > Hi John, > >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

Hi John, Why not march, due to reporting group 1, could you describe in detail ? AFAIK, the incubator project and tlp project need to report at the first 3 months :-) > 在 2017年2月21日，10:26，John D. Ament 写道： > > Justin filed the report for February. RocketMQ will need

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

Justin filed the report for February. RocketMQ will need to report through April (due to reporting group 1) John On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:58 PM Bruce Snyder wrote: > So far we have only filed one board report because I did not realize that > Incubator podlings were

Re: Looking for contributors for sub-project RocketMQ-JMS

Yep. we have not announced the latest release. we will move our latest Hackathon project once finish to publish it .:-) > 在 2017年2月21日，10:05，Justin Mclean 写道： > > Hi, > >> Now RocketMQ-JMS project has accumulated about 20 features, and we are >> looking for new

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating)

Hi all, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded here:

Re: Looking for contributors for sub-project RocketMQ-JMS

Hi, > Now RocketMQ-JMS project has accumulated about 20 features, and we are > looking for new contributors to promote this project more quick. If you > hope to contribute something for RMQ, it's also a good place to do it. Is there any intention to move this project off github and into the

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

So far we have only filed one board report because I did not realize that Incubator podlings were required to file reports for the first several months. I have created the wiki page to collaborate on the next podling report here:

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

Apologies for response until i read the latest board report. Next month, i will file a report for rocketmq podling process. BTW, Do we need every mentors to sign off? I found only justin mentor have done it.:-) Thanks mentors help for the last 2 board reports. Best regards, Von Gosling >

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #64: [ROCKETMQ-102] When shutdown(), the persisted ...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/64 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10234328) Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 31.919% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #64: [ROCKETMQ-102] When shutdown(), the persisted ...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/64 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/10234328) Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 31.919% when pulling

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53 @dongeforever we can continue to polish this PR, IMO. if you have any problem. please let me know. BTW, can you post your performance test result for us --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] incubator-rocketmq issue #53: [ROCKETMQ-80] Add batch feature

Github user vongosling commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53 Yep agreed @lizhanhui . I will make some comment as much detail as possible. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as