Re: Duplicated TextNode in HTML module

Flash Builder does not seem to be showing duplicates. At minimum, it can just sort all of the classes it finds and toss out duplicates. The way the compiler deals with duplicates is by using the compile time stamp in the catalog.xml and always let source-path entries win over library-path

Re: Duplicated TextNode in HTML module

Alex, Flash Builder has such tolerance ? Do you have any knowledge how that IDE handles such thing ? I will spend some time to setup Intellij and see how am I seeing this thing there. I completely agree with you that we have big fish to fry - This is exactly one of them. It affects two IDEs

Re: [Royale] Collection work

Hi Peter, It looks pretty exciting! This new stuff may help with some sorting. Push the branch and maybe I will look if not I will definitely do this in the new year. Thank you and wish you all the best! Piotr 2017-12-18 23:24 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent : > Piotr (and anyone

[Royale] Collection work

Piotr (and anyone else interested): Adobe has its winter break next week but I am leaving earlier (tomorrow) and will be back working on the project in January. I have created a temporary branch, CollectionData, with my work in-progress. While this branch is incomplete, you might be interested

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > Can you give an > example of what the POST payload should look like? I've tested it by using this example [1]. (It contains some unnecessary /t/r, but it works for me) Just copy and paste it to e.g. Postman. Hope this helps, thanks for testing! If I'll found enough

Re: Testing npm deployment

Royale (JSOnly) has no extra downloads. Royale-swf needs the non-open stuff (AIR, Flash, Flat). On 12/18/17, 12:20 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Alex Harui

Re: Duplicated TextNode in HTML module

Hi Guys, It look like those duplication that is something on the Royale. Josh took a look into the problem [1]. Should we change compile-js-config.xml or it is something which we need to look deeper somewhere ? [1] https://github.com/prominic/Moonshine-IDE/issues/87#issuecomment-352525906

Re: Testing npm deployment

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Om, > > I have not tested the royale-swf package and I wouldn't be surprised if > that package needs help since it does have a script that downloads other > stuff, so it would be a great help if you could make

Re: internal types in subclasses

I can’t think of a way. Hence my question… ;-) > On Dec 18, 2017, at 8:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Not sure. Is this sort of thing legal in pure AS3? > > -Alex > > On 12/18/17, 7:55 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> I have a class which has an

Re: Testing npm deployment

Hi Om, I have not tested the royale-swf package and I wouldn't be surprised if that package needs help since it does have a script that downloads other stuff, so it would be a great help if you could make sure that package is working and that npm installs of the nightly builds works in general.

Re: Testing npm deployment

Okay, this is one way to do it which I am not too opposed to. So, at this point, I assume there is nothing else to do to as far as npm goes? How can I help? I will leave my branch as is in case we decide to go that route at a later point of time. Thanks, Om On Dec 18, 2017 10:04 AM, "Alex

Re: internal types in subclasses

Not sure. Is this sort of thing legal in pure AS3? -Alex On 12/18/17, 7:55 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I have a class which has an internal class for an Object definition: > >class DrawRecord{ > public var rect:Rectangle; > public var color:uint; > public var

Re: Testing npm deployment

That is the question I've been asking for several posts now. AIUI, when you publish a package in NPM, the package is copied to NPM's servers. This post [3] implies that we should not use "npm publish" on anything that isn't released. So my conclusion, and what I checked in, was two NPM packages

Re: Testing npm deployment

We need multiple versions of package json: release jsonly, nightly jsonly, rc jsonly, release jsandswf, nightly jsandswf, rc jsandswf. Nightly and rc builds need to be loaded from static urls, wheras releases need to be loaded from a mirror. Where will mirror url resolution take place? How are

Re: Testing npm deployment

Hi Om, My logic is that package.json goes into a binary artifact for NPM, so at some point, we are supposed to vote on package.json being correct. If you modify package.json after the vote, or don't put in in a source artifact, we are technically releasing an unapproved file. If we find

internal types in subclasses

I have a class which has an internal class for an Object definition: class DrawRecord{ public var rect:Rectangle; public var color:uint; public var alpha:Number; public var columnRect:Rectangle; } This class has a subclass which sets one of the properties in this

Re: Duplicated TextNode in HTML module

Hi Alex, Thanks for the information. I'm still not sure where the bug is. It is for sure not in the Moonshine code - I have checked it and Harbs confirmed that he is seeing the same in VSCode. I don't have such problems with Flex SDK. Thanks, Piotr 2017-12-18 6:39 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui

Re: Testing npm deployment

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Om, > > I'm not sure what your definition of "direct dependency" is, but we > already have Maven stuff in the source package so we can directly publish > Maven artifacts to Maven central. What is wrong with

Re: Hackathon

My schedule changed. I’ll be in NY from January 1 through January 11. It does not look like I’ll be able to fly anywhere else. If it’s possible to arrange something in NY during that time period, I’m still interested, but otherwise, I’m pretty limited. Thanks, Harbs > On Dec 8, 2017, at

Re: Testing npm deployment

Hi Om, I'm not sure what your definition of "direct dependency" is, but we already have Maven stuff in the source package so we can directly publish Maven artifacts to Maven central. What is wrong with having NPM stuff in the source package as well? The plan is currently to run the Maven