Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #544

See Changes: [UKINANFR] Fixing bug with static function resolution -- [...truncated 137.29 KB...] [java] Loading configuration:

RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

Hi Alex, Mx:ModuleLoader is compiled successfully now I can see mx:Module on output screen. Now I will work on remote object. -Thanks, Alina Kazi -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 10:38 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org S

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-typedefs #846

See -- Started by timer Building on master in workspace > git.exe rev-parse --

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1847

See -- [...truncated 431.46 KB...] [java] [java] 4903 bytes written to C:\Program Files (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\target\

Re: Adding a Bead with visual elements (containers and controls) after all MXML components in an MXML component

There probably isn't one right way. It depends a bit on how you and the users think about it. MXML Containers have a childrenAdded method that gets called. That method should be dispatching a "childrenAdded" event, but "childrenAdded" also is dispatched when anyone calls addElement at runtime

Adding a Bead with visual elements (containers and controls) after all MXML components in an MXML component

Hi I have an MXML component with several form controls and the las set of controls are only used some times (in some instances of that MXML component). So I'm creating that part as an IBead. I want to know what's the recommend way to make this bead be added to the strand when the rest of MXML con

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1846

See Changes: [aharui] fix new compiler errors [aharui] fix how addingChild/childrenAdded work [aharui] default values [aharui] legends now sort of work --

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #543

See Changes: [aharui] catch calls to accessors [aharui] report error if we can figure out a local var was used before its [aharui] report errors detected during JS output

Re: Private API names

It would probably work, but why chase the inheritance chain at all? Go ahead and add that if you really want to, but I would rather we not use colliding private names in the framework, and only one person spoke up to say they use colliding private names in their code. Historically, folks really

Re: Private API names

Alex, I'll give this a try today and report back. Maybe we can have our cake and eat it too. :) On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:29 AM Greg Dove wrote: > > 'I'm not sure it is worth figuring out how far up the inheritance chain > the other private variable is and assigning numbers ' > > I was just mean

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #542

See Changes: [joshtynjala] compiler-jx: fixed issue where compc incorrectly created empty js/out -- [...truncated 137.36 KB...] [java] Load

Re: Private API names

'I'm not sure it is worth figuring out how far up the inheritance chain the other private variable is and assigning numbers ' I was just meaning at simple class level - so not doing anything more than that. The 'depth number' is the same for all private fields Y extends Object X extends Y in Y al

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #541

See Changes: [joshtynjala] compiler-jx: compc can generate source map files and add them to SWCs -- [...truncated 137.32 KB...] [java] Load

Re: Private API names

Hi Greg, #1 is a good idea and will help, but the value for that variable is still pushed far to the right in the debugger and pushed other code far to the right in the source window. #2 and similar ideas will help. I'm not sure it is worth figuring out how far up the inheritance chain the ot

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1845

See Changes: [carlosrovira] fix selectedItem in Jewel DropDownList -- [...truncated 431.48 KB...] [java] [java] 4903 bytes written

Re: Private API names

Hi Alex, "IMO, it makes debugging the framework really painful." I feel your pain. I didn't try switching it off yet, but I wonder if it can be on by default with a different approach: example: this.org_apache_royale_jewel_beads_models_DropDownListModel__selectedIndex 1. have the 'private' part

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1844

See Changes: [carlosrovira] fix findIndex in CollectionUtils -- [...truncated 431.47 KB...] [java] [java] 4903 bytes written to C:

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #540

See -- [...truncated 137.40 KB...] [java] Loading configuration: